The Movement, Social Fears, Economy, The Future, (IOW- concrete & WTC ), merged Options

[lunk]

Here is a paper on WTC1 written by Gregory Urich.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/...assAndPeWtc.pdf

He estimates the WTC1 mass at 317,500 [short] tons or 288,100 metric tons.

Thanks dmole,

"6.4.4 Conclusions
The calculated mass of 288,100 metric tons (317,500 short tons) is found to correspond with two other comparable structures (in terms of mass per unit floor area), data from NIST’s SAP2000 model, and the reported amount of recovered debris. The calculated mass refutes the popular notion that the building weighed 500,000 tons. Further studymay be warranted to examine other contemporaneous structures, validate the SAP2000 model values, and establish a more reliable estimation of the distribution between sources of removed debris."

I'm still trying to figure out if there was any difference in the amount of steel used in the construction of the WTC (including building 7) and the amount of steel recovered, from those sites.

[Christophera]

Thanks dmole,

"6.4.4 Conclusions
The calculated mass of 288,100 metric tons (317,500 short tons) is found to correspond with two other comparable structures (in terms of mass per unit floor area), data from NIST’s SAP2000 model, and the reported amount of recovered debris. The calculated mass refutes the popular notion that the building weighed 500,000 tons. Further studymay be warranted to examine other contemporaneous structures, validate the SAP2000 model values, and establish a more reliable estimation of the distribution between sources of removed debris."

I'm still trying to figure out if there was any difference in the amount of steel used in the construction of the WTC (including building 7) and the amount of steel recovered, from those sites.

There is a material that logically would have been used to create such weight; the worlds most common building material, that IF it was actually used as a steel reinforced mineral based tubular core structure, instead of what FEMA states, perfectly matching photographic evidence of 9-11, but it is an alternative not allowed to be discussed here, as FEMA and the Port Authority have not endorsed that it was utilized in the buildings.

This post has been edited by Christophera: Aug 23 2008, 11:59 PM

[lunk]

There is no complaints department.

9/11 was an obvious false flag.
But, there is no agency to complain to, about it.
The voting system is corrupted,
the elected representatives are mostly
in the pocket of corporate interests.
The media, most of it, is controlled.
We are brought up in a world where we are lead to believe
is ruled by experts,
...controlled too.

We are taught history from a one sided point of view, world wide.
Ridiculous rules and regulations are being set up everywhere,
for proven falsehoods,
...like, CO2 is a human caused global warming problem...

It all makes one almost want to give up, and give in.
...but that is what it is intended to do.

I guess the lucky-rabbit-foot-print,
in all of this is the fact,
that they are doing this.

Because there must be a chance, that we can,
individually and/or collectively,
completely stop this process.
And probably our compliance, must be necessary,
for them to fulfill,
their well documented,
(but obscured in trivia,)
agenda.

imo, lunk