There's No Independent Verifiable Evidence For A Missile At The Pentagon, if you disagree please post evidence here Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

The work of CIT has thoroughly debunked the missile theories.

We feel strongly that it's important for people to drop speculation and to focus on only hard evidence if we want the movement to progress.

We present only hard evidence proving the plane did not hit the building on 9/11.

Unfortunately there are people who still feel the need to discuss missile speculation which reduces the efforts of the truth movement to conspiracy theory.

I believe there is absolutely zero independent verifiable direct evidence for a missile and that this theory is extremely harmful to the movement as much as no planes at WTC if not more.

Naturally I am always open for evidence so if anybody knows of any feel free to post it here.

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: Feb 25 2009, 12:35 AM

[Craig Ranke CIT]

This is NOT a debate about DU!

I agree 100% that it is heinous, harmful, and in essence a WMD in its own right.

But if any of you are arguing that you would be able to detect heightened radiation levels from DU in the soil 33 miles away from a single missile buried deep in the Pentagon I have some land in Iraq to sell you.

The Bollyn report is not verifiable evidence for a missile. The notion is absurd.

To you GroundPounder,

I'm not trying to "dictate" anything.

I am merely trying to make crystal clear the FACT that there is ZERO independent evidence for a missile as NOBODY has provided a single piece in this thread or anywhere.

So if you choose to accept this theory based on pure speculation that is entirely your business.

Of course this is extremely harmful and completely undermines everything we have accomplished proving 9/11 was an inside job but if that's how you want to contribute obviously I can't stop you.

However if you choose to do it here I can make sure you at least keep it in the debate section where it belongs because it is not valid research.

It is speculation.

If you can't provide any independent evidence the least you could do is admit that much.

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: Feb 26 2009, 12:47 PM