9/11: Flight Recorder Analysis - Wikipedia Displays Blatant Disinformation Again

Rating 5 V
rob balsamo
post Mar 19 2009, 05:45 PM
Post #1

Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1


Wikipedia Displays Blatant Disinformation Once Again
Flight Data Recorder Analysis

03/19/09 - Wikipedia, a primary on-line resource for diverse information, allows anyone to edit their 'wiki' pages. Many are aware through articles published by Reuters and other news organizations[1] that Wiki is a haven for intelligence agencies who also use it as a means of distributing false and misleading information. Recently it has come to our attention that an edit was made to the "9/11 Conspiracies" page containing factual errors and disinformation regarding Flight Data Recorder (FDR) analysis.

The original entry is as follows:

A June 2007 video, attributed to researcher Calum Douglas of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, presents an analysis of alleged Flight 77 black box data,[141] said to have been obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) under a Freedom of Information Act petition. It states that the approach path and altitude on the Flight Path Animation differs from the mainstream account of the path of Flight 77.
The updated edit and disinformation is as follows:

However, this is likely due to the fact that the NTSB animation which has been released is a working copy, in which the post-added animation is incorrectly calibrated to end the animation at the moment the plane hits the Pentagon. Similarly, the last piece of data from the FDR for United Airlines Flight 93 ends 4 seconds before the plane crashed into the ground, when it was still at an altitude of 2,182 feet.[142] A paper written by NASA scientist Ryan Mackey on Flight 77's FDR data suggests that the last piece of data from the FDR was likely from approximately 4 seconds before the aircraft struck the Pentagon, explaining why the last piece of data on the FDR shows the plane at an altitude of 180 feet, even though the NTSB concluded that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon about 6 feet above the ground at a descent rate of about 39 feet per second.[143] In June 2007, the National Transportation Safety Board stated regarding the inconsistency between the FDR data and the reconstructed working animation that, "This working copy was never used for an official purpose; instead, the Safety Board is notifying all recipients of this animation that the record includes an erroneous annotation."[144]
The editor begins the wiki entry with pure speculation as defined by the words, "...this is likely due to...". The editor also fails to acknowledge that the NTSB has released more than an animation. The NTSB have also released CSV files of data and a NTSB Flight Path Study. Neither of which the NTSB contends are "working copies" and both show the aircraft at an altitude too high to hit the light poles and Pentagon. The Wiki editor also conveniently omits pertinent facts when quoting "an erroneous annotation". The reason the NTSB added the disclaimer of "working copy" to their animation is not due to "missing seconds" as deceptively intended by the Wiki editor, the disclaimer is due to an error in their clock annotation which was erroneously labeled as "EDT" instead of "UTC". The NTSB also states their goal is to send the "most complete, accurate information possible" when distributing data through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA). The NTSB does not account for, nor claim, any "missing seconds" from their data provided through the FOIA. Positional Data and plot as provided by the NTSB confirms the fact that there aren't any seconds missing from the NTSB plotted and provided data west of the Pentagon wall. Further inquiry with the Flight Data Recorder manufacturer as explained and recorded in Calum Douglas' presentation referenced above, is further confirmation that such FDR's cannot be missing more than 0.5 seconds. Also, in a poor attempt to set precedent, the anonymous Wiki editor references United 93 Flight Data Recorder for comparison to American 77 FDR explaining that UA93 data stops at 2,182 feet and therefore is also missing 4 seconds of data. However, according to the UA93 data provided by the NTSB, the vertical descent rate is exceeding 1,000 feet per second for the last second of data. If the data were missing 4 seconds as claimed by the anonymous Wiki editor, the data would have stopped near 6,000 feet, not 2,182. The wiki editor fails to understand that, when corrected for local barometric pressure, 2,182 is the ground elevation of the field in Shanksville where UA93 was alleged to have crashed. Anyone with Google Earth can cross check this for themselves. Although there are many other issues with UA93 events as provided by the NTSB FDR data, neither AA77 or UA93 data are "missing [any] seconds".

The editor goes on to source a third party internet forum post as a "paper" and attributes this to the NTSB by stating, "..even though the NTSB concluded that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon about 6 feet above the ground at a descent rate of about 39 feet per second...". The NTSB makes no such conclusion and is further proof the anonymous wiki editor prefers blatant disinformation over actual source. The third party forum post was written based on a hypothetical scenario in response to Pilots For 9/11 Truth Arlington Topography and Obstacles article, it is not consistent with any flight data whatsoever, and is certainly not from the NTSB as claimed by the anonymous wiki disinformation editor.

For further references on debunking the disinformation regarding FDR analysis and other topics, please visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=7163.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Flight Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html for full member list.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/join to join.

Related Articles:

Conflicting Data, Hardcore Questions and the Media Blackouthttp://pilotsfor911truth.org/media_blackout022908.html

Can the Govt Get Their Story Straight? - Location Of Flight Data Recorder

[1] OhMyNews
NZ herald
Wired WikidGame
Wired on coverups
Huffington Post
Think Progress
Related Diebold WikiEdits
NASA leads .GOV edits, how Wikiscanner works
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- rob balsamo   9/11: Flight Recorder Analysis - Wikipedia Displays Blatant Disinformation Again   Mar 19 2009, 05:45 PM
- - Aldo Marquis CIT   WOW. F------ sickening. It is that skank Aude. She...   Mar 19 2009, 06:52 PM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (Aldo Marquis CIT @ Mar 19 2009, 04...   Mar 20 2009, 12:58 PM
- - rob balsamo   Digg it... http://digg.com/politics/9_11_Flight_R...   Mar 19 2009, 07:33 PM
- - rob balsamo   Article hits RawStory.. http://www.rawstory.com/ ...   Mar 19 2009, 11:46 PM
- - rob balsamo   The above article also sent to ALPA, NTSB and L3 C...   Mar 20 2009, 12:28 AM
- - rob balsamo   http://www.prisonplanet.com/wikipedia-disp...once-...   Mar 20 2009, 10:59 AM
- - GroundPounder   wiki has been doing that kind of thing for years.....   Mar 20 2009, 12:36 PM
- - Sanders   Excellent work and great news on this info getting...   Mar 20 2009, 12:45 PM
- - rob balsamo   Not sure who "Aude" is, but i think it w...   Mar 21 2009, 11:20 AM
- - Craig Ranke CIT   Great article! I don't think RKOwens is A...   Mar 21 2009, 01:10 PM
- - paranoia   this is the edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index....   Mar 22 2009, 12:12 AM
- - paranoia   Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/September 11 co...   Mar 22 2009, 02:44 AM
- - rob balsamo   ok.. thanks Paranoia... I got my source from dMol...   Mar 22 2009, 02:56 AM
- - dMole   http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid...   Mar 22 2009, 02:23 PM
- - rob balsamo   http://www.opednews.com/articles/9-11-Flig...09031...   Mar 23 2009, 12:33 PM
- - paranoia   thanks dmole, i stand corrected. i searched/compar...   Mar 23 2009, 06:33 PM
- - paranoia   rob i dont know if you clicked the link aldo/craig...   Mar 23 2009, 06:57 PM
|- - rob balsamo   Thanks for hashing this out guys. Its good to make...   Mar 23 2009, 08:50 PM
- - paranoia   thanks for that info rob. im a little surprised th...   Mar 23 2009, 10:51 PM
- - Cary   QUOTE rkowens YT channel states he is a 23 yr old ...   Mar 24 2009, 12:15 PM
- - dMole   It looks like the paragraph about the AA77 SSFDR d...   Apr 13 2009, 11:27 AM
- - rob balsamo   Added the below to our original article... QUOTE ...   Apr 13 2009, 01:25 PM
- - rob balsamo   hehe... gotta love it... http://www.prisonplanet...   Apr 13 2009, 05:32 PM
- - rob balsamo   I should also add a special thank you to dMole for...   Apr 13 2009, 05:43 PM
- - IRIQUOIS227   I don't see what difference this makes. Since...   Apr 13 2009, 06:38 PM

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2018 - 01:59 AM