United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To Atc/radar, PilotsFor911Truth.org

post Apr 25 2009, 04:48 PM
Post #1

Woody Box

Group: Respected Member
Posts: 266
Joined: 28-August 06
Member No.: 20

Admin Edit: Article merged with original posts from United 93 Forum section. Article is posted below.

I'm still in the process of gathering evidence that the radar blip beyond Shanksville which was believed to be Flight 93 by every controller, supervisor, and official, was a real plane and not just an artefact on the Traffic Situation Display. (This TSD theory is promoted by the govt loyalist site, Cheap Shot aka Colin Scoggins, Lynn Spencer etc.). And there is plenty of evidence.

But what I found now is so far-reaching, and in the light of Domenick's findings and the shootdown discussion I think it's helpful to make it public right now. It's a transcript within the FAA Command Center, between the National Traffic Management Officer, East Position ("ntmo-e") and Doug Davis of the Operations Center ("doug"). I've highlighted the relevant parts.

1405 (10:05 a.m.)

ntmo-e: ok united ninety three we're now receiving a transponder on and he is at eighty two hundred feet

doug: now transponder and he's eighty two-hundred

ntmo-e: southeastbound still

doug: eighty two hundred feet and now getting a transponder on him

ntmo-e: correct

doug: ok buddy


ntmo-e: ok we've lost radar contact with united ninety three
doug: all right


ntmo-e: sixteen south of Johnstown where they lost united ninety three and it was heading turning one four zero heading

doug: which will put him to what do you think

ntmo-e: uh I guess that put him down coming right just west of Dulles

doug: ok

ntmo-e: if he stays on that heading of course

doug: how we doing John with getting stuff on the ground

ntmo-e: uuhh we're the're not the're still going to their original destinations if you look at TSD you'll see that the eastern part of the unites states is thinning out

doug: ok

ntmo-e: uh you know airports like dulles uh new york there we have no aircraft going into there

doug: ok


ntmo-e: ok uh there is now on the on united ninety three

doug: yes

ntmo-e: there is now a report of black smoke in the last position I gave you fifteen miles of Johnstown

doug: from the airplane or from the ground

ntmo-e: uhh they're speculating it's from the aircraft

doug: ok bud

ntmo-e: uhh who hit the ground that's what they're speculation it's speculation only

doug: ok


doug: hey john

ntmo-e: yes

doug: do we have anything on delta nineteen eighty nine is she still heading to cleveland?

ntmo-e: delta nineteen eighty nine was returning to Cleveland and they were no longer treating it like a hijacked aircraft

doug: ok

ntmo-e: I don't know if he's landed ok; the last position of united I'm going to give some coordinates united ninety three

doug: yes

ntmo-e: three nine five one north zero seven eight four six west

doug: zero seven eight four six

ntmo-e: west

doug: west

doug: all right

ntmo-e: you got the thirty nine fifty one north

doug: ya thirty nine fifty one north zereo seven eighty four six west

ntmo-e: that's the last known position of united ninety three



United 93 switched on the transponder at 10:05 (two minutes after its alleged crash), and the transponder indicated an altitude of 8200 ft. It is heading southeast.

One minute later, at 10:06, radar contact with United 93 is lost, at the position 39,51 north, 78,46 west. This point is about 13 miles southeast of the crash site.

This is the death of the TSD theory. An extrapolated radar blip (without an underlying plane) is hardly capable of switching the transponder on, is it?

There can be no doubt that United 93 did not crash at Shanksville.

This post has been edited by rob balsamo: Apr 28 2009, 11:40 AM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
rob balsamo
post Jul 8 2010, 08:13 PM
Post #2

Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,744
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1

Hi LaBTop,

Yes, we bolded the sentence "16 miles south of JST" in our original article, copy/pasted from the ATC Transcript. But the last known position given in lat/long is used by ATC to give a more accurate position.

Please review this particular statement made in our original article...

"It is impossible for ATC to have observed United 93 transponder and altitude after the reported impact time and southeast of the crash site, if United 93 did in fact crash in Shanksville as the 9/11 Commission would have you believe. "

In other words, if ATC observed the last transponder return at 16 south of JST, where did they get the lat/long coordinates far past the impact crater?

This is one of the many reasons why we call for a new independent investigation. A real one this time. Some others prefer to make excuses.

And yes, thanks for the heads up on the broken link in the article regarding forum discussion. I merged the original forum discussion with this thread originally started by woody, and as noted in the first post of this thread. I forgot to update the original article on the website. If it is not done within a week or two (my plate is pretty full), please give me a reminder.

Hope this helps and thanks again...

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- woody   United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To Atc/radar   Apr 25 2009, 04:48 PM
- - rob balsamo   Good work Woody. From my understanding, a coast m...   Apr 25 2009, 05:10 PM
|- - woody   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Apr 25 2009, 09:10 P...   Apr 25 2009, 05:59 PM
- - rob balsamo   If it were in coast mode, ATC wouldnt have been ab...   Apr 25 2009, 06:35 PM
- - rob balsamo   United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - Acc...   Apr 28 2009, 11:37 AM
|- - woody   I have another argument against the "coastal ...   Apr 28 2009, 03:53 PM
|- - Cheap Shot   QUOTE (woody @ Apr 26 2009, 06:53 PM) Is ...   May 4 2009, 10:59 PM
|- - FreshKills   QUOTE (Cheap Shot @ May 4 2009, 10:59 PM)...   Aug 6 2010, 06:58 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (FreshKills @ Aug 6 2010, 06:58 PM)...   Aug 6 2010, 08:30 PM
- - Domenick DiMaggio CIT   RE: United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To Atc/radar   Apr 29 2009, 02:00 AM
|- - brian78046   QUOTE (Domenick DiMaggio CIT @ Apr 29 2009, 0...   May 6 2009, 10:07 PM
|- - Kesha   QUOTE (brian78046 @ May 7 2009, 02:07 AM)...   Jun 1 2009, 04:13 PM
- - Enver   In my book "9/11 Unveiled" I concluded t...   May 4 2009, 11:01 AM
- - datars   Nice!   May 4 2009, 01:55 PM
- - peaches   The following website may prove to be a tremendous...   May 5 2009, 02:36 AM
- - dMole   Thank you peaches. There are several threads abou...   May 5 2009, 02:44 AM
- - IRIQUOIS227   The impact site of alleged impact site of United 9...   May 5 2009, 12:23 PM
- - aerohead   The 93 story is such a joke for anyone with a brai...   Aug 1 2009, 07:59 AM
- - LaBTop   Woody, and Rob and others, In this thread there a...   Jul 8 2010, 11:46 AM
- - LaBTop   In your Board Message article regarding : United 9...   Jul 8 2010, 07:36 PM
- - rob balsamo   Hi LaBTop, Yes, we bolded the sentence "16 m...   Jul 8 2010, 08:13 PM

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2018 - 05:02 PM