9/11: World Trade Center Attack - Official Release! Options

[rob balsamo]

"9/11: WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK" analyzes the events which took place in New York City on the morning of the 11th of September 2001. Analysis includes Black Box Recovery, Radar and Speed data analysis, Aircraft Control, and "Hijacker" Pilot Skill. Interviews with 757/767 Captains from United and American Airlines.



Order today in our DVD Section.

[Leslie Landry]

I tried to rate it but its not showing that i did for some reason.

Im going to get you the audio later tonight ok..just going to watch a movie with the little one then finish it off.

Looks great rob! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[rob balsamo]

ty

[p.w.rapp]

Just rated it 5* -
(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[Guest_Turbofan_*]

Looks great, I can't wait to get my copy!

[Shallel]

Just pre-ordered!

Can't wait to see this!

Thanks for your great work.
You Rock!

Blessings, Shallel

[politicstahl]

Looks Great!

Will order as soon as I can afford it.

[Sanders]

I'm really looking forward to this Rob ...

The teaser looks GREAT, and I can't wait to see how you dealt with some of the issues such as speed.

Rock on !
(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[BlatantNews]

This looks excellent, really intrigued to see what is presented in the film!

are you guys gonna put out the full film on YouTube or Google Video?
if so, this could be excellent to get up in our documentary section

George :)

[Westgate]

Pre-ordered Rob - looking great - thanks again for what you are doing.

[cam]

very stunning, even the average idiot can grasp the concept.

[hturt]

I ordered 2 just incase I don't get it the first time I watch it.

Sincerely,
Average Idiot

[Guest_Turbofan_*]

Sweet Job Bro!

The pilot interviews really hit home, along with the emphasis on exceeding aero limits and uncontrolled flight.

When I saw "Rusty" was an actual captain of the alleged hi-jacked 767, my skin crawled. Having his account
should bring credibility to the facts in your video; let alone the parallel of a fighter jet landing on the carrier vs.
the WTC strike in a commercial airliner - at LANDING speeds!

What is left to say? Real pilots, with time in type stating the impossibilty of the government story. Would you
believe the anonymous internet fools, or an actual pilot?

I'll fly this over to local news as usual; maybe with all the recent hype these stations will finally clue in!

Thanks for the plug at the end of the video. I feel honoured to be associated with this research.

[Rickysa]

I can't say enough good things about it (I had the good fortune to see a sneak preview today.)... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/handsdown.gif)

very professional, excellent handling of the technical aspects for the layman

you couldn't have painted a clearer picture

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)

over the top!

I can't wait to get a hard copy for home to show folks

Kudos Rob

I really believe that the work you (collectively) are doing will be the thing that breaks 9/11 open

Rick

This post has been edited by Rickysa: Sep 22 2009, 12:41 PM

[JimMac]

BRAVO! Job well done!

A lot of questions about the aviation industry community popped into mind while watching this. Its so obvious that the offical story is a crock, and it should be obvious to anyone paying attention in the industry that this is so. Where are the voices? Sheesh.. I have a number of relatives and long time friends in the aviation industry; an air force pilot (with missions), commercial pilot, and a handful of private pilots, mechanics and so on...they are all going to receive one of these videos in the mail from me.

People are just too passive about this knowledge and recognition of it. They have their heads buried like ostridges I guess. I'll do my part to wake up those in my circle.

[Omega892R09]

A lot of questions about the aviation industry community popped into mind while watching this. Its so obvious that the offical story is a crock, and it should be obvious to anyone paying attention in the industry that this is so. Where are the voices?

That is a question I have been pondering since the attacks when I appreciated that things did not look or sound right. My aviation and engineering experience and knowledge told me so.

So why were so many, much more highly qualified than myself silent?

Maybe. Just maybe the work of Rob et. al. Will encourage some of the many who could assist further with hard data, i.e. buffet and structural limits for airframes and engines to break cover. Or at least make approaches.

[Omega892R09]

Well done Rob this keeps it clear and simple and sticks to what is known. There can be no room for wriggle by the deniers, but of course they will try to muddy the IAS/TAS/EAS and Mach number waters to obfuscate over it. As they do they will reveal their ignorance.

I have not yet reached the end (at last I have fixed the last broadband wrinkle which now makes it possible to consider watching such video material - I have been hamstrung for so long and this has impacted my ability to contribute) but I am considering crunching some numbers now that I have something to go on.

The remarks of Ross 'Rusty' Aimer, at 27:03, re Concorde at sea level are most important and to amplify this I have a copy of Christopher Olbar's 'The Concorde Story' here which includes a flight envelope diagram (Are there none such available for 767-200s?). I have photographed this using my Macro kit and will be creating a vector diagram based on this. I shall ftp the diagram as a PNG or GIF up to my web site and link from here. I hope it will help shed light.

I have noted a problem with the source URL from which the EAS definition came, 09:24. You have it displayed as aerospaceweb.com which took me to a page of links. I think that it should be aerospaceweb.org.

[lunk]

Another excellent video!

I think the ridiculous picture of the 767 breaking the speed of sound, would make a great avatar.
...or cover picture on the final DVD, as most of the video was about impossible speed.

The analogy of driving through a mini lube at 150 miles an hour, really hits home.

I am wondering what was the maximum to minimum possible speeds,
that the planes could have been going, when they hit the towers,
did they both fly in at the same speed, by any chance?

...just some thoughts.

[JimMac]

Another excellent video!

did they both fly in at the same speed, by any chance?

good question... did they?

[rob balsamo]

UA175 reported speed 510 knots.

AA11 Reported speed 430.

We cover both in the film....

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)