United Airliners Tracked A Different Flight 93 Than The Faa, according to ACARS messages |

![]() ![]() |
Sep 24 2009, 04:13 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Woody Box Group: Valued Member Posts: 230 Joined: 28-August 06 Member No.: 20 |
The ACARS messages between United and Flight 93 have been released, with astonishing insights. Here's the flight path according to ACARS:
9:22 PIT (Pittsburgh) 9:32 CAK (Canton/Akron) 9:36 CLE (Cleveland) 9:47 TOL (Toledo) 9:51 FWY (Fort Wayne, IN) 10:10 CMI (Champaign, IL) IMO, the strongest case for plane duplication until now. More here: http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2009/09/un...-different.html |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 11:05 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,772 Joined: 14-December 06 From: Fort Pierce, FL Member No.: 331 |
Interesting information, supporting what most of us already know--the OCT is a damn lie.
|
|
|
|
Oct 24 2009, 06:33 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 26 Joined: 26-September 09 From: Iowa USA Member No.: 4,630 |
http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2009/09/un...-different.html
I'm transitioning from VB 5 to VB.net. I can see you went to a lot of work. Very nice. Thanks for all the well laid out info. |
|
|
|
Feb 26 2010, 04:50 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 19 Joined: 29-September 07 From: italy Member No.: 2,272 |
From Bambooboy, "Case Study Acars Ual Ua93 Rev 3.0b En":
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27408068/Case-St...a93-Rev-3-0b-En See the discussion about on loose change forum: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums.../2319930/1/#new |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2010, 09:32 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 154 Joined: 1-March 07 From: Indiana Member No.: 711 |
Woody, do you think this comment from Marr about UAL 93 is
QUOTE Marr told Commission staff that his focus was on UAL 93, which was circling -source: 9/11 Memoover Chicago. Marr thought VAL 93 was waiting for word over what had been happening across the country to begin its attack. a. A blip insert. b. Your second "swap" plane. c. The official plane As the story goes, the official plane doesn't leave Cleveland airspace so we can rule out C. We can't confirm or deny A. Could this be the plane that flew from Chicago airspace and then s/sw through Champagne causing the ACARS to be sent to Champagne? There is no purpose for this route in the event of a swap or within the context of the official story. So I think we can scrap this scenario. Or perhaps Chicago airspace was the launch point for the swap plane? Marr is 'seeing' the swap plane before the swap as described in the memo. The official plane is lost on radar, the swap from Chicago takes place near Cleveland in the radar hole, and the official plane continues to fly s/sw resulting in the ACARS to Ft. Wayne, IN, Champagne,IL and then who knows where? |
|
|
|
Mar 1 2010, 09:11 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 43 Joined: 28-February 10 Member No.: 4,935 |
Woody, do you think this comment from Marr about UAL 93 is -source: 9/11 Memo a. A blip insert. b. Your second "swap" plane. c. The official plane As the story goes, the official plane doesn't leave Cleveland airspace so we can rule out C. We can't confirm or deny A. Could this be the plane that flew from Chicago airspace and then s/sw through Champagne causing the ACARS to be sent to Champagne? There is no purpose for this route in the event of a swap or within the context of the official story. So I think we can scrap this scenario. Or perhaps Chicago airspace was the launch point for the swap plane? Marr is 'seeing' the swap plane before the swap as described in the memo. The official plane is lost on radar, the swap from Chicago takes place near Cleveland in the radar hole, and the official plane continues to fly s/sw resulting in the ACARS to Ft. Wayne, IN, Champagne,IL and then who knows where? Hi, look, this memo is absolutely not in contrast with what the ACARS say. Marr has info on UA93 from some radar, not from RGS. but some acars messages, show that the aircraft was in contact with the RGS of TOLEDO and the with the one of FORT WAYNE. Both of them, are really near by Chicago, and their 200 miles VHF range, also cover Chicago ( this does not mean that Chicago does not have a its own RGS, but "circling over" can easily mean: near by Chicago, and this fits well with the RGS of Toledo, for example ). thx for the link to the memo. plz, read the CASE STUDY ( sorry for my poor english ) and also follow the discussion here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/22732#comment-227911 and here: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums.../2319930/1/#new all my articles are here: http://info911insidejob.blogspot.com/ Bambooboy This post has been edited by bambooboy: Mar 1 2010, 09:13 PM |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 10:27 AM |