IPB





GUESTS PLEASE REGISTER FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS (you must be logged in to post)
POSTS MADE ON THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
John Bursill And Craig Ranke Mano-a-mano
Paul Tassopulos
post Oct 12 2009, 01:36 PM
Post #1





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 41
Joined: 7-May 09
From: Hollywood
Member No.: 4,306



QUOTE
Paul contacted John Bursill and invited him to this forum to debate me one on one about a week or two ago. Bursill declined and said he was too busy. Bursill is a moderator at the Aussie 9/11 truth forum 911oz. The administrator of that forum, Hereward Fenton, started a thread there regarding Michael Wolsey's interview with Jim Hoffman attacking CIT by labeling us "disinfo".

After about 4 pages of discussion I was alerted to the thread and joined the forum for the first time in order to contribute. John Bursill showed up and reiterated what he told Paul when he was challenged a couple of weeks ago. He said, "Hello Craig I don't have time to enter into a debate at present".

But apparently he wasn't being sincere because he proceeded to debate anyway. Although I remained perfectly civil he threatened to lock the thread, "Ps - would you rather we lock the thread...suits me fine?" for no reason whatsoever other than to flex his authority and ability to stifle the discussion while once again suggesting he was done participating by saying "Good bye!".

But he continued to participate and showed up again with an off topic post regarding pictures of debris while implying this somehow refutes the north side eyewitnesses and supports a 757 impact. When I civilly pointed out that this was a logical fallacy he replied again but proceeded to level a personal attack by saying, "are you insane???" and proceeded to again wield his authority by announcing he was banishing the thread to the fighting pit. Bursill said, "Any way if you wish to accuse me of "a logical fallacy of the highest order" then I think this thread can go to the pit!".

And to "the pit" it went where Bursill continued the discussion.

So clearly.................


Craig Ranke challenges John Bursill

Original Concept for “Ultimate Combat Arena”

This post has been edited by Paul Tassopulos: Oct 12 2009, 01:41 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A. Syed
post Dec 19 2009, 03:03 PM
Post #2





Group: Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: 17-May 08
Member No.: 3,358



Looking forward... I understand it takes place quite shortly (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 02:46 AM