Roosevelt Roberts Interview, Is this turn possible? Options

[chris sarns]

It's easier to put the disjointed pieces together by reading the transcript. Leaving out all the um's and searching for the right words, it breaks down like this:

Roosevelt:
coming from the 27 side heading east towards DC . . . it looked like it went over on the mall entrance side and turned around . . . . the plane . . . was facing west, so it went. . . southwest away from the Pentagon. . . around the lane one area, and it was like banking just above the light poles like. It was heading . . .back across 27. . . and it looks like . . . that plane was heading . . . southwest.

http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread382628/pg1

The purple-ish path is what Roosevelt surmised from what he saw - the plane flying away to the south-west.
The red path combines what the north path witnesses saw and what Roosevelt saw.
The radius is about 330 feet. (?)

It's unlikely that Hani chickened out at the last second so let's assume somebody in the E4B was "flying" the 757 [or 737]. Assuming no pilot, can a 757 or 737 handle the g-forces to make that turn at a speed sufficient to stay in the air while making that turn?

(IMG:http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/8973/rrflightpaths80.jpg)

This post has been edited by chris sarns: Nov 4 2009, 10:30 AM

[albertchampion]

CIT....would you please reveal this chris sams' relationship to richard gage and architects and engineers for 911 truth.

is it you opinion that chris sams is functioning as an agent of that group to torpedo your work.

i want to know.

i have supported gage. but if he is energizing this clown, i want to ask for my money back.

all ears

[Craig Ranke CIT]

CIT....would you please reveal this chris sams' relationship to richard gage and architects and engineers for 911 truth.

I'm not quite sure. Maybe Sarns will let us know.

is it you opinion that chris sams is functioning as an agent of that group to torpedo your work.

No not at all.

Unlike Sarns, Richard Gage is a logical and reasonable person who was easily able to understand the importance of what we have accomplished which is why he endorsed National Security Alert.

Even more importantly, after being barraged with lies and distortions about the info and us personally by people who have an unreasonable agenda against CIT and all Pentagon attack research Gage was man enough to call me and meet with me in person before rushing to judgment.

The result was very positive as he stands by his endorsement to this day despite all the pseudo-controversy surrounding us fueled by unreasonable people like Sarns.

i have supported gage. but if he is energizing this clown, i want to ask for my money back.

all ears

That is a commendable offer but there is no need for that.

We support Gage and his work as he does us.