9/11: Pentagon Aircraft Hijack Impossible, FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT Rating Options

[rob balsamo]

9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE
FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR", cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, "...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers..."[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]

Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html for full member list.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/join to join.

[1] Hijacker Timeline - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=17

[2] Common Strategy Prior to 9/11/2001 - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

[3] Right click and save target as here to download csv file with "FLT DECK DOOR" parameter.

[Maha Mantra]

I imagine there will be some looking for other sensors that may indicate something other than the officail story now.
So if a previous flyby or simulator fake blackbox recording was sent out representing Flight 77, and a reall 767 flew over the Pentagon on 9-11 as per eye-witnesses, what is the take on the actual damage and the knocked-over light-poles ? Its surprising there are no witnesses to something hitting the poles unless the five-frames movie was also fabricated at some previous time, and then that leaves a rather messy scenario for laying out mangled light poles. Its a bit odd that none of the eye-witnesses who saw the plane fly to the north side of the Citgo didn't see anything fly down the path to knock over the light poles. Has anyone seen people planting mangled light-poles ?
Mangled light-poles pre-planted would be a reason to consficate nearby camera footage.
Could they be covered up ?
What about lights being on the previous night ?
Anyone monitor such things as street lighting around the Pentagon ?
Or is it that another large aircraft capable of taking out all the light poles flew in at the same time un-noticed ?
Also all the calculations regarding Flight 77 might be useful for determining what kind of aircraft could have made the manuever and at what speed. Also the five frames would indicate to some degree the speed of the object, if that was real-time and authentic. The damage to the light poles may indicate the speed of what hit them also.

Off topic (cont.), the video of the F-4 atomizing against the wall which is used as evidence that an aircraft at 500 MPH can vaporize, has to be considered when one looks at the planes hitting the trade towers and showing no vaporization against the steel tubing or floor structures. Another point is that the 767s are not capable of 500 MPH at Sea level, so at their top speed at Sea level, would they vaporize like the F-4 Phantom does hitting the wall ? (I think most of you have seen the video of the F-4 on a rocket sled hitting the 12 foot thick wall)

Not to minimize the latest data or any of the other points, I just don't get on here very often, sorry.