America’s Enemies – Not Islamists For Sure Options

[Rehmat]

Islamists have a long history of hatred towards Communism. It were the Islamist Afghan Mujahideen who destroyed the might USSR – not the US, Britain, France or Israel. On the other hand, America’s No.1 beneficiary, the Zionist entity and American Jewish groups and individual traitors who have acted against the interests of American people. It were the Rosenbergs who died on electric chairs and Jonathan Pollard serving a life sentence and not Maj. Hassan for treason against American people.

On larger canvass – The Lavon Affair (1954), JFK assassination (1963), USS Liberty attack (1967), Operation Trojan (1986), Pan Am 103 bombing (1988), 9/11 and Guantanamo Concentration camp were all Zionist False-flag operations for creating American hatred towards the Muslim world for the benefit of the Zionist regime.

The Zionist groups spend millions of dollars each year to carry-on anti-Islam propaganda in the US and around the world; targeting Muslim politicians, religious leaders, and academics, who dare to criticize Israeli policies against Palestinians or Lebanese. However, the greatest victims of these Zionazi thugs are Muslim minorities in the West – who are painted as the “homegrown terrorists”.

How the Zionists sway the US foreign policy against the Muslim world can be seen by a recent example, quoted by former Indian diplomat M.K. Bhadrakumar is – former CIA boss in Pakistan, Milton Bearden, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “The other regional players (China and Russia) are busily setting the stage for exploitation of Afghanistan’s natural resources, while the US remains bogged down with war. This should change.” Contrary to this advise, one of the leading Zionist Lobby’s mouthpieces, Robert Kaplan, wrote: “The world is not fair. A worse outcome to staying and helping the Chinese would be withdrawing and losing a great battle in the war against radical Islam.” I bet, the Islamophobe has no problem with Israel’s US$5 billion annual trade with China.

Kevin Barrett PhD in his article, titled Zionist war on Islam is also a war on America, wrote:

“Any body who has taken Geopolitics 101 knows that the prime US foreign policy objective is to prevent the rise of a nation or bloc that could dominate the Eurasian land mass. The rising nation today is China, a new superpower with a 10% growth rate. And the dangerous (to US interests) bloc is the Shengahai Cooperation Organization, which adds Russian energy resources and nuclear weapons to the mix.

If it were rationally pursuing its national interests, the US would be trying to help other powers act as counterweights to the development of potentially hostile Eurasian bloc. The only sensible way to do that would be to support “radical Islam”, not fight it.

When the Zionist and their dupes speak of “radical Islam”, what they really mean is not the crazy, isolated terrorist groups, most of them run by Mossad and other Zionist-influenced intelligence agencies that target their fellow Muslims. What the Zionists are mortally affraid of is the Islamic world becoming politically united and economically and technologically successful.

The movement to rebuilt the Islamic nation, the Ummah, is supported by a strong majority of Muslim worldwide. Two-third of world’s 1.5 billion Muslims would even like to unify all Islamic countries into a single Islamic State……

Why isn’t the US actively helping the Muslims to unite? Because this war on Islam is waged by a fanatical minority of Zionists who have usef their power in finance, media, political money, and organized crime to essentially take over the US and turn it against its own interests, as well as the interests of the world’s Muslims.

The Zionists know that if Muslims gain a tiny fraction of the power they ought to have, relative to their proportion of the world’s population – Israel as a Jewish apartheid state is finished………”

SOURCE

[lunk]

Perhaps, at one level.

But on another level,
there is very little difference between people,
on Earth, physiologically.
Yet, individually, we are all unique.
there really are only 2 groups,
and one is a subset of the other;
the individual, and people "en mass."
one is infinite,
the other is,
a lot more of the same thing.

[Rehmat]

Perhaps, at one level.

But on another level,
there is very little difference between people,
on Earth, physiologically.
Yet, individually, we are all unique.
there really are only 2 groups,
and one is a subset of the other;
the individual, and people "en mass."
one is infinite,
the other is,
a lot more of the same thing.

Is this a 'YES' or 'NO' response to my post?