Another Question For Warren Stutt, concerning altitude Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Warren Stutt,

You must be aware that people are referencing you to suggest that your findings contradict the statements by P4T that the last reported altitude in the NTSB data shows a value too high to hit the light poles and the building.

Are you willing to set the record straight here and at j.ref by publicly agreeing that your findings in the data concerning altitude CONFIRM the findings of P4T that it shows the plane too high to hit the light poles and the building?

[rob balsamo]

Hi Warren,

The limitations which are publicly available are the Federal Aviation Regulations.

This requires an altimeter to be within +/-75 of error or the airplane is grounded until repaired or a new altimeter installed.

Comparing Radar Altitude to True altitude during departure, the altimeter is within 30 feet and within one - two feet of vertical climb, PA vs RA. During departure we can be certain the Radar Altimeter is measuring from the ground. During the approach to the pentagon, we have no way to positively identify from what type of object the Radar Altimeter is measuring.

Those who make excuse for the govt story need to prove the Pressure altitude was in error in excess of 120 feet. An altimeter does not "drift" such an amount of error in one flight.

For more on airspeed calibration and measurement and how pneumatic and other errors are minimized or eliminated from a specific airframe when performing type certificate testing at high and low speeds, high and low altitudes, please see here...

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=103

Keep in mind, this whole discussion is predicated on the assumption that your decode is accurate. As you have already pointed out, you have two sets of PA data based on which conversion factor used from either the Boeing Generic Data Frame Layout or the Custom American Airlines data frame layout. I wont get into too many details now, but there is a reason the American Airlines layout has a different conversion factor.

If your decode is inaccurate, this whole discussion is moot. And is why our research remains unchanged with respect to wanting answers from the NTSB/FBI based on the data/information they have provided. Our core member list continues to grow.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

[wstutt]

Hi Rob,

<snip>

Comparing Radar Altitude to True altitude during departure, the altimeter is within 30 feet and within one - two feet of vertical climb, PA vs RA. During departure we can be certain the Radar Altimeter is measuring from the ground. During the approach to the pentagon, we have no way to positively identify from what type of object the Radar Altimeter is measuring.

If you have a look at row 606 of ReadOut2, the ALT is 74 and the ALTRad is 8186 and in row 611 of ReadOut2, the ALT is 48 and the ALTRad is 8191.
In these 5 seconds, ALT has decreased by 26, while ALTRad has increased by 5. This means the total difference between ALT and ALTRad is 31 feet and this error has occurred under normal flight conditions.

<snip>

For more on airspeed calibration and measurement and how pneumatic and other errors are minimized or eliminated from a specific airframe when performing type certificate testing at high and low speeds, high and low altitudes, please see here...

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=103

<snip>

I looked at the NASA document linked to on that page. It says "The calibrations must be performed under various flight conditions of airspeeds and altitude as well as aircraft attitudes and configurations (combinations of flaps, gear, and external stores).". Do you know whether the flight conditions that 757's are calibrated for include the combination of high speed and low altitude?

Keep in mind, this whole discussion is predicated on the assumption that your decode is accurate. As you have already pointed out, you have two sets of PA data based on which conversion factor used from either the Boeing Generic Data Frame Layout or the Custom American Airlines data frame layout. I wont get into too many details now, but there is a reason the American Airlines layout has a different conversion factor.

<snip>

I'm interested in the reason for the different conversion factor.

Warren.