My picture collection, Surrounding building damage |
  |
My picture collection, Surrounding building damage |
 Nov 17 2006, 02:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 9,271 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1  |
Some of my first work when i first started researching 9/11.
(IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/WTC5crop.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/wtc6paint2.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/WTC_Building_sitewithpaint.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/wtcsteelconctbigpaint.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/ground_zero_arial1paintWTCdamage2.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/ground_zero_arial1irregular.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/wtc6a.jpg) (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/wtc6b.jpg) |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 17 2006, 04:25 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 453 Joined: 23-October 06 From: Maryland Member No.: 139 |
JDX --They were great pictures back then, and they're great pictures now. Thanks for posting them again.
Just a passing comment: That damage seen in your photos shows gaping holes in the tops of buildings // doesn't it seem logical that random falling debris from the towers would most likely have added more so to the tops of those buildings than what we can see in the photographs -- creating gaping crevices many floors deep. It's almost like all the 'toothpaste' was squeeze from the inside-out // not the opposite of outside-in. Make sense? I'm sure you said YES. Later. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 04:36 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 7 Joined: 14-December 06 Member No.: 320 |
I've been involved in some rather strained dialogues at LC and the govt loyalist site regarding the strange absence of large concrete slabs.
My argument has been that the supporting evidence indicates the use of powerful explosives because a gravity collapse wouldn't account for the almost total pulverization of all the reinforced concrete. Most of the Ground Zero cleanup footage around the former WTC 1 & 2 seems to support this, mostly pulverization, but I'm curious if there is photo evidence of the other near-destroyed WTC buildings (3,4,5 & 6) that reveals large pieces of concrete as would be expected in non-CD destruction? I realize I'm probably wasting my time because the skeptics will counter argue that the smaller buildings will have less powerful gravitational damage. Still it would be interesting to know. MM |
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 04:46 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Ragin Cajun Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,691 Joined: 14-August 06 From: Baton Rouge, LA Member No.: 5 |
Welcome to the forum Miragememories. Actually, the pictures of WTC 4, 5 and 6 would be good evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 08:22 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 7 Joined: 14-December 06 Member No.: 320 |
Thanks waterdancer. Nice resolution.
MM |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2007, 10:31 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Newbie Posts: 12 Joined: 18-January 07 Member No.: 465 |
I found this gallery the other day:
http://www.jimmacmillan.com/911/index.html The nice thing about it is that the pictures are captioned with the approximate time they were taken. The bad thing is that thay are small. But here's one I found elsewhere that I think is interesting: (IMG:http://thesubversive.com/wtc_images/20thflcore.jpg) It is allegedly a 4" plug from a core drilled hole on the 20th floor of one of the towers, from 1975. It does give you a good idea of what the floors were made of. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 08:32 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 334 Joined: 17-February 07 Member No.: 627 |
Unbelievable, even the stone within the cement were transformed into dust clouds!
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 08:01 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Newbie Posts: 6 Joined: 20-June 07 Member No.: 1,198 |
I recently read that the concrete was four inches thick. I know the angle is deceptive but that looks like 5 or 6 inches to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 18 2010, 02:38 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 11 Joined: 23-March 10 From: Left Coast U.S.A. Member No.: 4,978 |
QUOTE (Critter183 @ Jan 23 2007, 10:31 PM)  I found this gallery the other day: http://www.jimmacmillan.com/911/index.html The nice thing about it is that the pictures are captioned with the approximate time they were taken. The bad thing is that thay are small. But here's one I found elsewhere that I think is interesting: (IMG:http://thesubversive.com/wtc_images/20thflcore.jpg) It is allegedly a 4" plug from a core drilled hole on the 20th floor of one of the towers, from 1975. It does give you a good idea of what the floors were made of. That link is dead, try this one... http://jimmacmillan.com/september-11th/ |
|
|
|
|
May 29 2010, 05:51 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 770 Joined: 1-February 09 From: FL Member No.: 4,096 |
I'm glad this got kicked up.
I've been meaning to look for these to add to my slide shows. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/handsdown.gif) This post has been edited by DoYouEverWonder: May 29 2010, 05:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
May 29 2010, 07:38 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 744 Joined: 25-April 08 From: Canada Member No.: 3,225 |
The USG themselves told you what caused those holes when they named the site "ground zero". We did not name it that, they did. Ground zero, hypo-centre of a nuclear event. Remember they said it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 08:35 AM |
