Inside The Whole Black Sparkly Universe., implications of the black hole universe theory. Options

[lunk]

What is a black hole?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

a black hole is a region of space from which nothing, including light, can escape.

Why?

The mass is greater than the volume of space can hold. It therefore, collapses in on itself, shrinking but maintaining its' original mass.

There is a new theory by Nassim Haramein, that everything has a black hole within its center, from atoms to galaxies, and the entire universe is within a giant black hole.

The big question, is if there is a huge amount of mass, in every atom, how can we even move matter?

The answer, i think, is in incredible smallness,
we know, by definition that a black hole must shrink in diameter.
We also know that massive things,
very far away, have little gravitational effect on us,
Perhaps, massive weights, if they are infinitesimally small,
have the same tiny effect as the gravitational force effecting us from gargantuan distant galaxies.

One can begin to see the entire universe down to the atom as just
a change in a logarithmic scale.
And indeed, it has been graphically shown to be such a scale, in
frequency vs diameter.
Atoms have a high frequency;
galaxies have a low frequency,
but the ratio remains the same, at all scales!

This confirms the theory of everything, having a black hole, of scale,
in the center of all things.

Even if one ignores frequency,
and just looks at mass vs diameter
a clear line can be shown for most "things" in our universe.
(IMG:http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/Images/CS04/cs04p28l.gif)
http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/Images/CS04/cs04p28l.gif

The thing about all of this,
is that we should look at black holes as mass, shrinking over time.
So there is no such thing, really, as a big or small black hole,
as they all are the same weight, in different stages of collapse, at any particular time.

So, if this avenue of thought,
has anything to it,
atoms would be older than stars,
because the diameter of the black hole inside (in the atom), has collapsed to the point where it no longer has a significant gravitational influence in our universe.

...much, much, more to come.

This post has been edited by lunk: Dec 26 2009, 01:47 PM

[lunk]

What is gravity?
(Or, why do i fall for the tighter curvatures...)

When something falls, say, toward the ground,
it accelerates, and gains kinetic energy.
Which is slowed or lost, in mechanical energy, if it hits anything,
or heat energy (if it's going really fast.)

All objects, regardless of their mass ((edit) if it is dense and close, enough), move toward the ground,
at the same accelerating rate,
if dropped into the same amount of increasing gravitational curvature,
at the same time.

Super-string theory suggests that if the speed of light is 1,
mass would equal energy.

So, as gravitational curvature increases, time is lost, by everything in it.
This lost time, is turned into kinetic energy, that gets added to the mass,
as tighter curvature is encountered.
Eventually, the curvature of gravity will be so tight, that the speed of light (there) will be only 1 m/s, compared to the speed of light, (here) of ~300,000,000 m/s.
But "there", that single meter,
would still look like 300,000,000 m "here" at lesser curvature.
It would take light a second to travel that meter,
at a greater gravitational curvature than here.

At an even greater gravitational curvature the speed of light would go,
even a shorter distance, in a second.
Eventually, from our perspective here,
the speed of light would be traveling no distance at all in a second.
And time would have stopped there, from our perspective here.
But there the distance to anything would be infinite,
and the all light and energy could not travel, and all that would be left would be the mass of the object, plus the kinetic energy, of the object, in the form now, of mass, in, what now has become for it, infinite volume.

Space is volume, and time is relative,
to the gravitational curvature toward
a central point, but before that, time becomes 0,
as the curvature of gravity becomes tighter
than the escape velocity of light.

As something moves into slower time it gains kinetic energy, as it gains kinetic energy it moves faster into more denser curvature, as long as nothing stops it, it will keep gaining kinetic energy as it looses more real time. once all real time is lost, energy can no longer be radiated and that energy is suspended from escaping out to the rest of the universe. As time has run out completely there, from our perspective, at a lesser curvature.

Now the hammer and the feather that get dropped into greater gravitational curvature, in a vacuum, would fall together at the same rate, but as they dropped the hammer would see the feather moving further away from it. as time goes slower through greater curvature distance between things, must appear to be getting farther apart.

When the hammer and feather reached maximum curvature they would seem to be infinitely distanced apart. (and unreachable to the rest of the universe, but they still have mass, and that will cause gravity,
that radiates spherically out from their centers of gravity,
expanding space by slowing time, a little more.


For the towers to accelerate at free fall speed,
there must have been no resistance at all, underneath,
or the kinetic energy extracted from their real-time, by moving through tighter gravitational curvature, toward the Earth, would be lost, and they would not have fallen, as fast as they did.

This post has been edited by lunk: Jan 19 2010, 08:56 AM