Inside The Whole Black Sparkly Universe., implications of the black hole universe theory. |

Dec 26 2009, 01:15 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
What is a black hole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole QUOTE a black hole is a region of space from which nothing, including light, can escape. Why? The mass is greater than the volume of space can hold. It therefore, collapses in on itself, shrinking but maintaining its' original mass. There is a new theory by Nassim Haramein, that everything has a black hole within its center, from atoms to galaxies, and the entire universe is within a giant black hole. The big question, is if there is a huge amount of mass, in every atom, how can we even move matter? The answer, i think, is in incredible smallness, we know, by definition that a black hole must shrink in diameter. We also know that massive things, very far away, have little gravitational effect on us, Perhaps, massive weights, if they are infinitesimally small, have the same tiny effect as the gravitational force effecting us from gargantuan distant galaxies. One can begin to see the entire universe down to the atom as just a change in a logarithmic scale. And indeed, it has been graphically shown to be such a scale, in frequency vs diameter. Atoms have a high frequency; galaxies have a low frequency, but the ratio remains the same, at all scales! This confirms the theory of everything, having a black hole, of scale, in the center of all things. Even if one ignores frequency, and just looks at mass vs diameter a clear line can be shown for most "things" in our universe. (IMG:http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/Images/CS04/cs04p28l.gif) http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/Images/CS04/cs04p28l.gif The thing about all of this, is that we should look at black holes as mass, shrinking over time. So there is no such thing, really, as a big or small black hole, as they all are the same weight, in different stages of collapse, at any particular time. So, if this avenue of thought, has anything to it, atoms would be older than stars, because the diameter of the black hole inside (in the atom), has collapsed to the point where it no longer has a significant gravitational influence in our universe. ...much, much, more to come. This post has been edited by lunk: Dec 26 2009, 01:47 PM |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 24 2010, 10:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
We live in a universe of gravitational gradients.
Time is lost to kinetic energy, in matter going through an intensifying gravitational gradient. For the speed of light to remain the same, the distance it travels in 1 second of time must always be about 300,000 km. From an observer in a less denser gradient of gravity, light seems to travel a shorter distance through a greater gradient of gravity, and a longer distance through a lessening gravity gradient. At the highest density of gravity, that we can see, light almost comes to a stop, relative to us, and energy can no longer radiate away, because it needs time to travel. Yet if we could be in that space, where the gravitational curvature seems to stop light, we would find the light measured there to still be going ~300,000 km/s. and there is an even greater density of gravity below that, where light seems to almost come to a stand still. And areas above that, where matter appears to be going the speed of light away. Welcome to the infinite scale of gravitational gradients. Where the distance to things, and their size, is dependent on the gravity gradient, light must travel through. We call intense gravitational gradient points, atoms or stars. Atoms are tiny in a greater gravitational gradient, Stars are massive and very far away, looking up, through the lesser gravitational gradient. The true variability in the universe is time. If time is short, distance is short, if time is long distance is long. Yet the passage of time should seem the same at every curvature, like being in a moving elevator, you don't know it's moving. And this is a good analogy, because if the elevator is going down, you are losing your potential energy, and energy takes time to radiate. So potential energy is potential time. This potential time is lost, to kinetic energy, as you descend into denser gravitational curvature. Energy must be applied to the elevator to lift you up into a lesser gravitational curvature. At a lesser density of gravity, light can move at a greater speed, but measured there, would still be ~300,000 km/s. Measured at the base of the elevator, light would measure the same speed, but this would appear to be going slower than the speed of light at the top of the elevator, if that, was measured from the bottom. So what is changing, is the apparent distances of things in different gradients of gravity, from the perspective of any place inside the gravity gradient. So for instance, the hydrogen electron has a very small circumference it must travel around its' nucleus. Most electrons travel around atoms at almost the speed of light. An electron is in an intense gravitational curvature, and light must travel -300,000,000 m/s at every curvature. How many times does that electron have to go around the nucleus, to go 300,000,000 meters?! So distance is a constant, at every scale, as it is the time it takes, for light to travel for 1 second, at any curvature, that varies. So if an electron is traveling around a hydrogen proton, at its' curvature, a second, of its' time would be, 300 000 km, and we know it goes around the proton (for 300,000 km) at our time in 1 second. snipped from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_radius QUOTE The lowest value of n is 1; this gives a smallest possible orbital radius of 0.0529 nm known as the bors radius the Bohr radius of hydrogen has a value of 5.2917720859(36) × 10^-11 m (i.e., approximately 53 angstroms) 2*pi*r=circumference (2x53Ax3.14) = 333.0088156A rotation around the proton 3.3x10^-13 km 300 000 km 3x10^5 in one second of time the hydrogen electron should do less than 9.1x10^17 rotations. (could someone check my math, this is looking a little too freakingly true) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmic_timeline QUOTE The present time is approximately 4.3 × 10^17 seconds after the Big Bang; the Sun and Earth formed about 2 × 10^17 seconds after the Big Bang. That would be 1 second, electron time, and that would be, nearly an eternity for us. |
|
|
|
lunk Inside The Whole Black Sparkly Universe. Dec 26 2009, 01:15 PM
lunk Nassim Haramein isn't the only one
with a bla... Dec 30 2009, 07:38 PM
lunk What is light?
Light is an electromagnetic wave... Dec 31 2009, 04:07 PM
painter speaking of light -- what interests me is the fact... Jan 1 2010, 12:17 AM
lunk QUOTE (painter @ Dec 31 2009, 08:17 PM) s... Jan 1 2010, 01:05 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (painter @ Dec 30 2009, 02:17 AM) b... Jan 11 2010, 12:52 PM
painter i wonder if it is a 'part'
suspect not Jan 1 2010, 01:31 AM
lunk QUOTE (painter @ Dec 31 2009, 09:31 PM) i... Jan 1 2010, 01:45 AM
lunk The atom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGMnC7B... Jan 1 2010, 01:56 AM
lunk I have found two, new, recent independent, theorie... Jan 1 2010, 09:29 AM
DoYouEverWonder Just to screw up all the black hole theories - now... Jan 1 2010, 10:10 AM
lunk QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Jan 1 2010, 06:1... Jan 1 2010, 03:53 PM
truthmatters Fascinating subject! Jan 1 2010, 06:00 PM
lunk Now that we have determined that we live in a blac... Jan 1 2010, 08:59 PM
lunk These ideas of this thread,
Inside The Whole Blac... Jan 2 2010, 07:09 AM
lunk QUOTE (lunk @ Jan 2 2010, 03:09 AM) (BTW.... Jan 9 2010, 12:31 AM
lunk Life inside a black-hole c-r
http://www.youtube.c... Jan 3 2010, 07:20 PM
lunk I've been thinking more on the idea of multi-u... Jan 5 2010, 07:54 PM
lunk Matter always wants to fall toward an area of spac... Jan 9 2010, 09:17 AM
lunk http://www.berkeleycitycollege.edu/faculty...in/pt... Jan 11 2010, 11:53 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (lunk @ Jan 9 2010, 01:53 PM) Light... Jan 11 2010, 12:57 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (lunk @ Dec 24 2009, 03:15 PM) The ... Jan 11 2010, 01:02 PM
lunk QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Jan 11 2010, 09:02 A... Jan 11 2010, 07:00 PM
lunk Satellites in orbit around the Earth have very acc... Jan 12 2010, 07:15 PM
lunk The speed of light is thought to be a constant, th... Jan 13 2010, 08:13 AM
lunk All this is new to me.
It's almost like the... Jan 13 2010, 11:53 PM
lunk The speed of light:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S... Jan 14 2010, 07:20 AM
lunk QUOTE (lunk @ Jan 14 2010, 03:20 AM) Perh... Jan 15 2010, 01:17 AM
lunk What appears to us as the electron going around th... Jan 15 2010, 09:19 AM
lunk If, we could change the curvature of space-time,
... Jan 15 2010, 03:44 PM
lunk Light has mass.
It is stuff.
But a magnifying gl... Jan 15 2010, 06:29 PM
lunk Here is an interesting thought:
The wing of a pl... Jan 17 2010, 04:15 PM
lunk The Moon is moving away from the Earth, at about a... Jan 19 2010, 12:47 AM
lunk What is gravity?
(Or, why do i fall for the tigh... Jan 19 2010, 08:48 AM
lunk Ever thought, that something going away from you, ... Jan 20 2010, 11:04 AM
lunk QUOTE Mass–energy equivalence
http://en.wikipedia.... Jan 20 2010, 09:53 PM
lunk ..."So lunk, what is the variable speed of li... Jan 21 2010, 12:44 PM
lunk Light, at our gravitational gradient, travels at s... Jan 22 2010, 02:37 AM
lunk As the gravitational density increases,
time beco... Jan 24 2010, 11:19 AM
lunk Why doesn't light do Doppler?
The speed of ... Jan 25 2010, 07:01 AM
lunk The electromagnetic spectrum:
mass vs diameter c... Jan 25 2010, 10:10 AM
lunk If all time based interactions are less than the s... Jan 26 2010, 08:39 AM
lunk This is a quote from a youtube poster, responding ... Jan 26 2010, 08:35 PM
lunk This concept is that all, that can happen, in this... Jan 27 2010, 03:11 AM
lunk QUOTE If the speed of light is a variable, and all... Jan 27 2010, 10:44 AM
lunk What it all boils down to is relative length.
Spa... Jan 28 2010, 12:08 AM
lunk I hope this make sense to someone other than me...... Jan 28 2010, 06:05 PM
nitatutt lunk:
I hope this make sense to someone other than... Jan 28 2010, 07:09 PM
lunk The other way of looking at this is that the insid... Jan 29 2010, 03:06 AM
lunk On the infinite and finite divisibility of vacuous... Jan 29 2010, 03:11 PM
lunk What is vacuous space?
Everyone wants to know.
E... Jan 30 2010, 10:51 PM
lunk What is lift?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_%... Jan 31 2010, 10:44 AM
lunk On the variable speed of light:
http://en.wikip... Feb 1 2010, 01:15 PM
lunk So far in this thread,
i have discovered, (or rea... Feb 2 2010, 11:57 AM
lunk Taking the view that the universe is an infinitely... Feb 2 2010, 02:17 PM
lunk This is a gem:
http://www.jemeter.com/info_Refra... Feb 3 2010, 10:00 AM
lunk QUOTE (lunk @ Feb 3 2010, 06:00 AM) Dolla... Feb 4 2010, 11:07 AM
lunk How to invert the current paradigms, of geologists... Feb 4 2010, 08:19 PM
lunk on Botany and Biology:
Life forms are made of en... Feb 5 2010, 09:39 AM
lunk Considering that the speed of light is really a so... Feb 5 2010, 08:52 PM
lunk Sound and light, light as sound,
Matter as time c... Feb 6 2010, 09:01 AM
lunk Solid, liquid, gas, plasma, vacuum,
the 5 states ... Feb 7 2010, 11:39 PM
lunk On electricity and magnetism:
We use these, thin... Feb 9 2010, 09:25 AM
lunk What were the ancient classical elements of alchem... Feb 10 2010, 07:43 AM
lunk i think this all means that we must start to look ... Feb 15 2010, 05:23 AM
lunk If it took an hour, for a second of time to pass, ... Feb 16 2010, 11:08 AM
lunk There are only,
3 forms of matter
atoms, ions, and... Feb 16 2010, 09:12 PM
BarryWilliamsmb Extremely Cool!
I'm not certain what I... Feb 16 2010, 10:19 PM

lunk QUOTE (BarryWilliamsmb @ Feb 16 2010, 06... Feb 16 2010, 11:42 PM
lunk QUOTE (lunk @ Feb 16 2010, 05:12 PM) Ther... Feb 19 2010, 02:59 AM
lunk Pi=3.14159265358...
We see the numbers, after the... Feb 19 2010, 09:35 AM
lunk QUOTE (lunk @ Feb 19 2010, 05:35 AM) Pi=3... Feb 21 2010, 09:47 PM
lunk If you think you need space,
let me tell you what ... Feb 23 2010, 08:56 PM
lunk An instant in time, is a moment, you see,
and the... Mar 2 2010, 02:58 AM
lunk Everything, is made from endless empty space,
tha... Mar 6 2010, 09:14 AM
lunk Exponential function:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... Mar 6 2010, 03:57 PM
lunk i think that this has much to do, with the whole s... Mar 8 2010, 12:11 AM
lunk Curvatures.
Sound radiating from a speaker, make... Mar 20 2010, 09:37 PM
lunk Time bubbles.
The idea here, is that within a g... Mar 21 2010, 09:56 PM
lunk Somebody asked me, the other day,
"If everyt... Mar 28 2010, 03:23 PM
lunk You see, if time is variable, then the distance th... Apr 2 2010, 04:55 PM
lunk As most of the universe is red shifted, and only o... Apr 2 2010, 05:01 PM
lunk Another thought:
If we are spinning around the su... Apr 2 2010, 05:12 PM
lunk "Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. W... Apr 11 2010, 06:54 AM
lunk (long lecture)
'A Universe From Nothing' b... Apr 21 2010, 02:26 AM
lunk i feel i should make a correction.
...yes, about ... Apr 28 2010, 08:38 AM
lunk Read clockwise from center out.
(... May 1 2010, 02:59 PM
lunk The point has no volume, but shows position.
it i... May 9 2010, 06:10 PM
lunk QUOTE (lunk @ May 9 2010, 03:10 PM) The p... May 11 2010, 09:59 PM
lunk Point, line, area, volume, time.
if the line can... May 10 2010, 06:20 PM
lunk OK...
if it takes a minimum of 2 points to make a... May 11 2010, 11:43 PM
lunk Hmmm, 5 volumes to make time...
Each volume must b... May 12 2010, 09:22 AM
lunk Here,
of course!
http://www.youtube.com/wa... May 17 2010, 09:26 AM
lunk The electro-gravitational singularity,
radiating ... May 23 2010, 02:15 AM
lunk As one approaches the speed of light,
time slows ... Jun 6 2010, 10:55 PM
lunk When i think of it, light is in the form of a wave... Jun 7 2010, 07:40 AM
elreb Lunk,
I have been on the wrong page all along.
I... Jun 8 2010, 06:20 PM
lunk Glad you found this thread,
i should have posted ... Jun 8 2010, 07:13 PM
elreb Lunk,
I understand wing lift due to pressure diff... Jun 8 2010, 07:42 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 06:38 PM |