John Bursill Called Out On His Bogus Flight Sim Conclusions, forced to watch "911: The WTC Attack" for the 1st time Options

[rob balsamo]

John Bursill has popped his head in to troll the comment section over at TruthandShadows blog. The comments are moderated there, so I will post my replies to John here as well since his account is still active here.... maybe one day he will actually get the courage to come here and get an education on the matter.


John,

Since it is clear you will need perhaps another three years to answer my questions, just answer these few....

Do you know the exact effects of Mach? In other words, the answer is not "shock wave". For clarity, what is the ultimate effect of mach on acting on the airframe? Do you know?


Do you feel traveling Mach 1 at say 22,000 feet has the same effects on the airframe as an aircraft traveling at Mach 1 near sea level?

Do you know why a manufacturer sets a Vmo and a Mmo?

Do you know why an aircraft becomes Mach limited as it climbs?

What happens to the Vmo pointer on the Airspeed Indicator as an aircraft climbs?

John, can you provide one aircraft which has exceeded it's limitations by more than 150 knots at any altitude and remained stable, controllable or held together?

Do you know how to calculate Equivalent Airspeed (EAS) yet?

Do you understand that Compressibility/Mach is taken into consideration when calculating an EAS up to nearly Mach 4?

Why have you not endorsed/signed your name to the numerous papers Legge has written and/or his numerous revisions? Why can you not find one aviation expert to endorse any of your claims?

John, you have failed to provide any evidence, data, precedent or expert opinion for your claims for over 3 years while we have provided numerous verified experts, data and precedent, and the list is growing.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

Let us know when you have any evidence for your claims other than "the govt tells me so..."

These are just some of the reasons you will never debate me nor are you ever able to find one aviation expert or aeronautical engineer to endorse your or Legge's claims. You are unable to understand basic aerodynamics and quite frankly, I question your experience in your claimed field as an avionics tech as well when you make claims such as pilots do not use a Sensitive Pressure altimeter below 2500 feet when shooting an approach to a runway.

Anytime you wish to get an education on the matter, feel free to stop by our forums at your leisure, your account is still active. I'll reply when I have the time. I will copy and paste the above to the thread titled with your name, at our forum.