Adam Syed Debunks Adam Larson At Blogger, They're once again trying to defend the "south of citgo" a |

Adam Syed Debunks Adam Larson At Blogger, They're once again trying to defend the "south of citgo" a |
Dec 27 2009, 08:13 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 108 Joined: 17-May 08 Member No.: 3,358 |
http://911blogger-bans-truth.com/node/22239
How strange that this vigorous attempt to neutralize CIT's work and defend the south path happens now, just after John Bursill conceded in debate to Craig Ranke. Fortunately it's the holidays and I had free time to take many of those supposed "south side witnesses" apart one at a time. Loose Nuke does respond to my responses, but you can tell it's desperation of someone who feels that winning = having the last word. It reminds me of "truthers" endlessly debating "debunkers" ad nauseum. First we had the Popular Mechanics disinfo. Then David Ray Griffin comes along and debunks the debunkers. But, there's always Ryan Mackey, there to debunk the debunker debunker. And that's just the big picture example. How often have we seen online debates between anti-truthers and truthers where the thread will go on for 10, 20, even 100 pages (the govt loyalist site?) and the party clearly in the wrong can't concede anything. Stefan made some great posts in the blogger entry as well. Kudos. What's really hilarious is how they try to spin Paik and Turcios as SoC witnesses, they consider Lloyde England a legit witness. What's really sad is how Larson and Larsen try to spin Roosevelt Roberts as a SoC witness. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 06:43 AM |