Video Of South Tower Being Hit Two Massive Explosions Options

[Paul]

Hi guys found this video interesting, it's a video of the south tower being struck by
flight 175 but what i found interesting is that a second or two after the tower is hit
there are two really loud explosive bangs which sound like actually explosives
going off there is really no delay between the two explosions they occur almost
simultaneously at the same time but my suspicion is the the sounds are faked
i just want to know what you guys think, is there really anyway of telling if they
are or not?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDmP3ZowyDE...feature=related

Are there any witnesses that anyone know of that heard two explosions or
multiple explosions just after the plane struck the south tower?

WTC 9/11 Rare New Impact Footage [NEW VIDEO QUALITY]

The footage is owned by the camera planet archive

Thanks cheers

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[amazed!]

Lunk

Do you remember that poster Christopher that used to be here? Maybe Christophera, within the last year or 2?

With photographic evidence, and working knowledge of construction and such (which I do not have), he made a fair case that the towers as built did not exactly comply with all of the plans.

Anyway, he theorized that in the concrete as it was poured, were placed charges, and wired together.

All I can say is that it would explain how the concrete was pulverized.

[lunk]

Lunk

Do you remember that poster Christopher that used to be here? Maybe Christophera, within the last year or 2?

With photographic evidence, and working knowledge of construction and such (which I do not have), he made a fair case that the towers as built did not exactly comply with all of the plans.

Anyway, he theorized that in the concrete as it was poured, were placed charges, and wired together.

All I can say is that it would explain how the concrete was pulverized.

i remember,
i tried to stick up for him, i wasn't exactly sure of his theory,
but he sure kept on about it,
to the point of annoying just about everyone here.
One interesting thing he said, was that all the original vcr library recordings had been updated, to an edited version of The Construction of the Twin Towers, on disk. His main claim was that the towers had a concrete core, not a steel core, as popularly believed.

ya, i know, the photo of the sun shining through the towers.
But he did have an explanation.
Reflection, i think...

Thermite is a very stable compound, it can last for years,
and they have used it since the railways.

It could have easily been rigged into the design and construction,
with few people knowing.
Remember, there are some that take a very long term view of things,
like generationally.
Everything built, in a city, will eventually come down.
So, why not design a "demolition strategy" into the commercial buildings in the first place, especially exceptionally, big, buildings, on valuable property.

...but who would ever lease an office in a tower that is pre-wired for demo, by design?

i was quite impressed by the details of his work.

This would mean that 9/11 was planned for, at least 30 years before,
it was carried out.

...and it makes me wonder, if it was planned, even before that.

Airplanes were used as the plausible explanation,
and smoke cover, for the towers' expected disintegration.