Video Of South Tower Being Hit Two Massive Explosions Options

[Paul]

Hi guys found this video interesting, it's a video of the south tower being struck by
flight 175 but what i found interesting is that a second or two after the tower is hit
there are two really loud explosive bangs which sound like actually explosives
going off there is really no delay between the two explosions they occur almost
simultaneously at the same time but my suspicion is the the sounds are faked
i just want to know what you guys think, is there really anyway of telling if they
are or not?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDmP3ZowyDE...feature=related

Are there any witnesses that anyone know of that heard two explosions or
multiple explosions just after the plane struck the south tower?

WTC 9/11 Rare New Impact Footage [NEW VIDEO QUALITY]

The footage is owned by the camera planet archive

Thanks cheers

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[7forever]

No plane was captured in two surviving live clips and that's proven conclusive by neither lady mentioning a jumbo jet approaching the towers. They are the best witnesses because it was filmed live, before, during, and after the explosion. Their initial reactions prove the footage is legit showing an unknown flying object..
(IMG:http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wb-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif)
(IMG:http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/angle-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif)

[23investigator]

[quote name='7forever' date='Sep 22 2011, 12:16 PM' post='10801394']
[/b]by neither lady mentioning a jumbo jet approaching the towers. They are the best witnesses because it was filmed live, before, during, and after the explosion. Their initial reactions prove the footage is legit showing an unknown flying object..

Dear '7forever'

Your considerations are very much worth "considering further".

Have you looked at the work carried out by some people in the UK, who modelled the footage containing the 'globe' as you are calling it.
Their work appears very valid, determining the angle of approach of the 'globe' and a velocity consideration.
The More recent consideration of this on Youtube considers from the 'model', that the 'globe', was something like 37 feet in diameter.
(Forgive me I have not gone back and checked this diameter they stated< my memory suggests that the first time I saw reference to this work the diameter was being stated more like 70 feet in diameter)

The point is, that whatever diameter you may care to consider it is not anything like the proportions of a Boeing 767.

From careful consideration of the video footage, it appears more like the 'globe' has been layered over the original object that was showing in the video footage.
Taking the consideration made in the 'model' if the extreme of the darker portion apparent under the 'globe' is considered it is much nearer to 70 to 75 feet in width.

The 75 feet could well be the wingspan of the object heading towards the South Tower.

Which certainly is not the wingspan of a Boeing 767.

Only in recent days a radar plot by the 'Tracon' at Kennedy airport has come to light.
The interesting thing about this is, that it aligns with the flight path that the people in the UK have determined.

So what aircraft has a wingspan of around 75 feet that has been disguised under the 'globe'.

That's the question.

Be assured the video footage has been edited, in this case not by placing a concocted aircraft over the top of the true --object, aircraft-- , but a bit like the case with the North tower, a smudgy mark, which if you go and have a look at that footage is so apparent, especially when you look at the left side of the footage and see the obvious masking effect near the edge of the buildings on the left.

Robert