Dr. Judy Wood, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons, She claims "thermite" is misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement. Options

[pookzta]

Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and currently serves on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.

Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including
Experimental Stress Analysis,
Engineering Mechanics,
Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
Strength of Materials Testing
Is this what Eisenhower warned us of?

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/short/shortpics/bubbler.jpg)
Figure 1. My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse. This is why I have chosen to stand up. My conscience leaves me no other choice.


From 1999 to 2006 Dr. Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina. Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech.
One of Dr. Wood's research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials. Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials and biological materials. Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moiré interferometry, a full-field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference. In recent years, Dr. Wood and her students have developed optical systems with various wavelengths and waveguides. Dr. Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports.

Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.


What destroyed World Trade Center buildings #1 & #2?
(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

See a video of the spire vaporizing into dust: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY

There is a wealth of information here: http://www.drjudywood.com

Could Dr. Steven Jones be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement with his nano-thermite hypothesis?

This video seems to think so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI

Please check it out,

-Abe

This post has been edited by pookzta: Mar 1 2010, 10:00 PM

[lunk]

(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

Interesting, the spire, is left behind, leans, and,
instead of falling over, collapses straight down,
leaving just dust.
...or vaporizes in the air.

What do we know of, that can vaporize steel?
A laser perhaps, from an orbiting satellite?
That's a guess. We do not know if we have this technology.

We do have nuclear reactors, we know that when a nuclear reaction goes super critical, iron vaporizes, like everything else,
except reflective material,
shiny things, and perhaps stacks of white paper.

The radiated heat can reflect off certain surfaces, and paper is a poor conductor of heat, and unlike a dark surface, a white surface is reflective, too.

Remember all the little pieces of paper in the dust clouds that day, the one thing that was not disintegrated to dust?

So, maybe it is more a question of what we know they have, and did use, versus, what we guess, that they could possible have, and may have used, to bring down the towers.

And how would they cover up, using what we know they do have?
By getting somebody to theorize on what they know, they don't have,
to make us think, that they are even more advanced than we think?

People would be freaked, around the world, if it was known that the suitcase nuke story, all over the media just before 9/11, was the fall back story if something went wrong, in their plane plan excuse, for the collapse (edit added: demolition) of the towers.

Cedar, has a pleasant aroma,
but some wood, just smells funny.
imo.

Perhaps some small fourth generation fission/fusion devices were used,
to take out the core, the residual heat and radiation, vaporized everything above it, for as long as it took the towers to fall, obscured by smoke and dust, and government coverup.

and they probably used thermite as well.

This post has been edited by lunk: Mar 1 2010, 11:53 PM