Dr. Judy Wood, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons, She claims "thermite" is misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement. Options

[pookzta]

Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and currently serves on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.

Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including
Experimental Stress Analysis,
Engineering Mechanics,
Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
Strength of Materials Testing
Is this what Eisenhower warned us of?

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/short/shortpics/bubbler.jpg)
Figure 1. My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse. This is why I have chosen to stand up. My conscience leaves me no other choice.


From 1999 to 2006 Dr. Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina. Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech.
One of Dr. Wood's research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials. Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials and biological materials. Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moiré interferometry, a full-field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference. In recent years, Dr. Wood and her students have developed optical systems with various wavelengths and waveguides. Dr. Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports.

Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.


What destroyed World Trade Center buildings #1 & #2?
(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

See a video of the spire vaporizing into dust: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY

There is a wealth of information here: http://www.drjudywood.com

Could Dr. Steven Jones be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement with his nano-thermite hypothesis?

This video seems to think so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI

Please check it out,

-Abe

This post has been edited by pookzta: Mar 1 2010, 10:00 PM

[KP50]

Once Dr Judy Wood tried to claim that the molten metal under the towers was not in fact molten, then I threw her into the disinformation basket. This isn't a binary operation, the people who destroyed the towers are allowed to use more than one method, she does not need to try to destroy all other theories so that hers can succeed.

But there is a dedicated band of people who support her, although it could just be the same person with many different forum personas.

[pookzta]

Once Dr Judy Wood tried to claim that the molten metal under the towers was not in fact molten, then I threw her into the disinformation basket. This isn't a binary operation, the people who destroyed the towers are allowed to use more than one method, she does not need to try to destroy all other theories so that hers can succeed.

But there is a dedicated band of people who support her, although it could just be the same person with many different forum personas.

but there is very little proof of molten metal... many of the pictures are weak or edited looking, and there are pictures of workers down in the bases of the WTC buildings shortly after the events.

i once was a huge pusher of the molten metal thing, but then I realized I was putting more into the testimonies then was necessary. for example, molten metal could have been present for a few days, but not weeks as the nano-thermite supporters suggest.

also, if nano-thermite was used, u would expect tons and tons of molten steel, and tons of fire damage. there was very little fire damage to the building, tons and tons of paper peices survived, the dust was reportedly cool, and more.

definitely keep an open mind.

i honestly believe Dr. Jones is an operative after reading more of Judy's stuff. after learning about his role in the Cold Fusion / Room Temp Fusion cover up, and after learning that he kicked Judy out of scholars for 9/11 truth because she made a post about there not being any planes...

Dr. Jones's credibility has been called into question, and now I consider Dr. Judy Wood an equally worthy scientist, if not a superior one.

Dr. Jones seems like disinfo.

just my 2 cents anyway

-Abe

[KP50]

but there is very little proof of molten metal... many of the pictures are weak or edited looking, and there are pictures of workers down in the bases of the WTC buildings shortly after the events.

i once was a huge pusher of the molten metal thing, but then I realized I was putting more into the testimonies then was necessary. for example, molten metal could have been present for a few days, but not weeks as the nano-thermite supporters suggest.

also, if nano-thermite was used, u would expect tons and tons of molten steel, and tons of fire damage. there was very little fire damage to the building, tons and tons of paper peices survived, the dust was reportedly cool, and more.

definitely keep an open mind.

i honestly believe Dr. Jones is an operative after reading more of Judy's stuff. after learning about his role in the Cold Fusion / Room Temp Fusion cover up, and after learning that he kicked Judy out of scholars for 9/11 truth because she made a post about there not being any planes...

Dr. Jones's credibility has been called into question, and now I consider Dr. Judy Wood an equally worthy scientist, if not a superior one.

Dr. Jones seems like disinfo.

just my 2 cents anyway

-Abe

Do you have to follow anyone? Just assess all the evidence on its own right but don't set up anyone as a hero who will save the day.

There were extraordinary temperatures below ground irrespective of the state of the metal. It points to a cataclysmic event in the basement levels of both towers just prior to collapse - hence the ground shaking. It wasn't any external weapon that caused that event. Once Dr Wood tries to assign every bit of evidence to her view of a beam weapon, trying to dismiss parts that don't fit in, then she is promoting disinformation.

[pookzta]

Do you have to follow anyone? Just assess all the evidence on its own right but don't set up anyone as a hero who will save the day.

There were extraordinary temperatures below ground irrespective of the state of the metal. It points to a cataclysmic event in the basement levels of both towers just prior to collapse - hence the ground shaking. It wasn't any external weapon that caused that event. Once Dr Wood tries to assign every bit of evidence to her view of a beam weapon, trying to dismiss parts that don't fit in, then she is promoting disinformation.

that's exactly what I'm doing, is thinking for myself and not following anyone. I will admit, I am using my intellect to analyze evidence that OTHERS have collected since I didnt take photos or walk through ground zero on my own, so that is all i meant by following. I should have meant supporting. The theory which I support the most is the one that Dr. Wood puts forward, as Energy Weapons seem to be the most likely cause of the dustification of the WTC buildings. You should check out her website, there are tons of weird things, such as cars being on fire but paper not catching on fire... office cabinets being mangled and warped yet the papers are unharmed within, giant steel pieces being bent and twisted in mind-bending ways (pun hehe)... very interesting webstie and photographic evidence she has. easy to analyze on your own, no faith necessary. just look at the pics for yourself and see if you draw the same conclusions!


also very important to point out that Dr. Judy Wood is one of the few people that has fired law suits against NIST for their false data and lies. She has filed 3 or so Qui Tam cases against them.

See here: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

also, she has been the subject of many disinfo attempts. Dr. Steven Jones sent a fellow "Scholar for 9/11 Truth" named Dr. Greg Jenkins to do an ambush interview of Dr. Wood.

Dr. Jenkins showed up with 2 video cameras and lighting to an event that Dr. Wood was only attending, but not speaking at. He ambushed her after the event and convinced her to do an interview. During the interview. Dr. Jenkins took a very particular role of trying to make Dr. Wood look foolish, avoiding her strong points and trying to focus on weak, and often irrelevant, points. It was very weird to see the video.

Here is a video recap of their interview: http://www.mefeedia.com/watch/27626168

(i saw the full, unedited interview, and it was rather lengthy and boring. the video above high lights the most significant moments and questions.)