Life After Death! |

![]() ![]() |
Jun 9 2010, 01:55 AM
Post
#141
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
Or perhaps passive and active! -1 is still 0. No matter what, we just cannot get away from the Thought and the Will as the primary source to absolutely everything. .....Even to the most insane! 'e', or the square root of -1 is really quite meaningless - if you think about it! (IMG:http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/4124/dsc00995v.jpg) Wish more people would come in from the cold! Cheers PS! Tried to rotate it, but apparently wouldn't do. Sorry! Tried again, so lets see! |
|
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 02:11 AM
Post
#142
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
Aha - so that's where we're getting our snowflakes from! Yes, have seen it before, and it wouldn't surprise me if it turns out to be a genuine phenomenon. Closer to Earth, we got another "phenomenon" when comparing the following to the Great Pyramid: (IMG:http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/1983/dsc01010f.jpg) Circle containing the Great Pyramid: Circumference = .................................. 308 ...... x π = ........... 968 ............. x ...... 7 = 6776 Circle area ..... = r^π ... = ............... 23716 ...... x π = ....... 74536 ............. = ..... 77 x .. 968 Sphere area .. = 4r^π .. = .............. 94864 ...... x π = ...... 298144 ............. = .... 308 x .. 968 Sphere volume = r/34r^π = ...... 4869685.33 ...... x π = .. 15304725.333 ...... = ... 77^ x 88^/3 15304725333 ................ = ........... 6776^/3 Forgot to tell, that the reciprocal number to the height of the hexagon in above circle is: 10 : 110889 = 09 018 027 036 045 054 063 072 081 090 099 108 117 126 135 144 153 162 171 180 189 198 207 216 225 234 243 252 261 270 279 288 297 306 315 324 333 342 351 360 369 378 387 396 405 414 423 432 441 450 Etc. etc. up to 900 when the decimal expansion continues thus: 909 918 927 936 945 954 963 972 981 991 00 000 09 018 027 .... repeating ad infinitum. Cheers Trying again, and so sorry for the previous mistakes! |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2010, 12:38 AM
Post
#143
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
7 11?
Let me get this right. All the dimensions of the great pyramid of Egypt, are ratios of solar system measurements? |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2010, 05:17 AM
Post
#144
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
7 11? Let me get this right. All the dimensions of the great pyramid of Egypt, are ratios of solar system measurements? No not quite, Lunk. The Great Pyramid itself is based on "the power of two". It is the circle containing the Great Pyramid and its diameter and circumference that beautifully reflect our solar system's measurements. Please check post 120 for the measurements of the Pyramid. The vertical height of the Pyramid, from the foundation base to the apex, is 154.0125 meters, but only if the circle act as the primary source to the ensuing measurements. (Ref. to the new axiom)! The mean distance to the Sun is estimated to be around 154 million kilometers, and the Sun's diameter to be 1.4 million kilometers. Cheers |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2010, 11:40 PM
Post
#145
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
No not quite, Lunk. The Great Pyramid itself is based on "the power of two". It is the circle containing the Great Pyramid and its diameter and circumference that beautifully reflect our solar system's measurements. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%C3%A8te%27s_formula (IMG:http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/c/e/0ce04afe01aec0ae61b1a8efc3da098c.png) circle food for thought |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 06:24 AM
Post
#146
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%C3%A8te%27s_formula (IMG:http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/c/e/0ce04afe01aec0ae61b1a8efc3da098c.png) circle food for thought I'm afraid not, dear Lunk. you were absolutely right in your previous post though: π/2 = 11/7. π = 22/7. 22 x 7 = 154. 154 meters being the height of The Great Pyramid, as previously mentioned. 154 million kilometers being the distance to the SUN, as ditto ditto. (You keep forgetting about the new axiom, don't you! - why is that???) OR, do you really only "believe" things if they come from 'official' 'academic' 'self-important' 'up-them-selves' sources!! Sources, who has absolutely no idea about the infinite importance of our dear sweet beautiful gorgeous vibrant perfect CIRCLE!! Please, perish the thought immediately ....... please please - i beg you! Cheers This post has been edited by Tamborine man: Jun 14 2010, 06:41 AM |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 09:04 PM
Post
#147
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
just food for thought.
if the great pyramid is based on the power of two, and creates a circle with the ratios of the planets, and all, in the solar system, it seems a, sort of proof, to find two in a solution to pi. |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2010, 07:44 AM
Post
#148
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
just food for thought. if the great pyramid is based on the power of two, and creates a circle with the ratios of the planets, and all, in the solar system, it seems a, sort of proof, to find two in a solution to pi. Again no, Lunk. It is the CIRCLE that 'created' the Great Pyramid, NOT the other way around. It is the Thought (the female principle) that creates, and the Will (the male principle) that makes the created manifest and concrete. The square root of two is solely connected to the square, and as such has no "dynamic vitality component" in its nature. All it can do is non-actively repeat itself. But of course, you're still right, though. 'Two' is certainly present in pi, nevertheless: first as 11 and then as 22, together with the ever present spiritual element 7 as the vibration that gives "Life"! I mean - how on Earth could we ever exist without the "Mother", eh?? Cheers This post has been edited by Tamborine man: Jun 15 2010, 08:00 AM |
|
|
|
Jun 16 2010, 08:24 AM
Post
#149
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 17 2010, 08:06 AM
Post
#150
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
Got it. Not sure exactly how this applies to a male and female principle, though, or what, exactly this means? Hi Lunk, as said earlier, the 'circle' is the "symbol" representing the female principle. On a physical level, the form of the female is much more 'rounded' than that of the male and her skin appears much more 'softer' and 'delicate' in comparison to the male's. (The exception being my own bum, but that's something i refuse to prove the validity of)! From post 132: "....... By Thought (that is, logos) an infinite diversity of changeable forms of energy and life are radiated. Above Thought stands the Will, as the highest concentration of the Light (the supreme, fructifying and life-giving energy), because as long as a thought of creating or of taking action remains only thought, it has but the possibility of coming to life—has the potential. However, the moment the fructifying Will acts, Thought unites with Will and changes from a state of becoming to a state of being; it becomes actual. But the Will is nothing without Thought as a constant basis for its activity. Thought thus is the primary abstract female concept: intuitive, formative and creative; and Will the primary abstract male concept: fructifying, productive and dominant. ......." "Above Thought stands the Will, ...."! Look at the Pyramid lay-out in elevation, and you'll see the King's chamber above and to the left of the Queen's chamber. It is the Queen's chamber that takes the 'center' position and not the other way around. The term 'King's and Queen's chamber" is a later human invention, and was not in the Thoughts of neither the architect nor the builder when the Great Pyramid was built. All they had in mind was "to the power of two", and humankind cannot never praise them high enough for this 'message' they send on to future generations. May it be truly understood in these perilous times - please! Cheers |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2010, 09:14 AM
Post
#151
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
Thought and will, combined,
could result in action, ...or inaction. i suppose a force, like gravity, could be thought of as will, without thought... Where as thought, with will, gave us the airplane. |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2010, 01:38 PM
Post
#152
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 54 Joined: 20-February 09 From: St-Hubert, Quebec. Member No.: 4,152 |
Hi, spirituality fans.
Here are good viewings on the subject: Life After Death! Deepak Chopra - Life after Death part1 +2 +3. . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rdYiLAz38 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r04uf2t8Uo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sUf2p2csR8 EDIT. I feel it is sad that this message has to go in the [Religion] section. I'm not a "religious" one, but a spiritual one, a little bit. . .(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) It would be fun if there was a [Spirituality] section in this site! or rename the existing? Blue skies. This post has been edited by CJEAN: Jun 18 2010, 01:52 PM |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2010, 03:55 PM
Post
#153
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
A horse can have spirit.
Spirituality is a huge subject. i think Lobsang Rampa, once wrote that the first thing one learns about spirituality, is that everything is spiritual. i tend to agree with much of what Deepak Chopra, said, and i think, Richard Dawkins tipped his hat, on his research abilities, with his comment on "rucksacks", in my mind. But how else, can all-knowing acquire all-experiences, from all-perspectives, except by independently experiencing them, from all independent perspectives, simultaneously? Everything that exists, is in the fleeting moment, where nothing can ever happen, because of its' timelessness. Yet, we constantly think of the past and the future, and take the present for granted. We only, can go on, what we have experienced, thought, and have willed, in this one life, and perhaps this is the only time when we can, know of the moment, by differentiating it, from this very real, illusion of living outside of that moment. As Tam says, the point at which thought, and will, come together. |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2010, 11:26 AM
Post
#154
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
A horse can have spirit. Spirituality is a huge subject. i think Lobsang Rampa, once wrote that the first thing one learns about spirituality, is that everything is spiritual. i tend to agree with much of what Deepak Chopra, said, and i think, Richard Dawkins tipped his hat, on his research abilities, with his comment on "rucksacks", in my mind. But how else, can all-knowing acquire all-experiences, from all-perspectives, except by independently experiencing them, from all independent perspectives, simultaneously? Everything that exists, is in the fleeting moment, where nothing can ever happen, because of its' timelessness. Yet, we constantly think of the past and the future, and take the present for granted. We only, can go on, what we have experienced, thought, and have willed, in this one life, and perhaps this is the only time when we can, know of the moment, by differentiating it, from this very real, illusion of living outside of that moment. As Tam says, the point at which thought, and will, come together. Actually Lunk, you're pretty spot on in my view, as the only reason for our existence, that i can see, is that we all eventually grow and evolve and progress to a full understanding of the absolute necessity to make the past become the future and the future the past. Only then will such an existence truly become like "living in the moment" where "time" ceases to have any 'meaning' or importance! It goes without saying that 'Darkness' could not exist in such a 'state of being', so we should get rid of this first of course! Cheers |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2010, 11:30 AM
Post
#155
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
Hi, spirituality fans. Here are good viewings on the subject: Life After Death! Deepak Chopra - Life after Death part1 +2 +3. . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rdYiLAz38 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r04uf2t8Uo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sUf2p2csR8 EDIT. I feel it is sad that this message has to go in the [Religion] section. I'm not a "religious" one, but a spiritual one, a little bit. . .(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) It would be fun if there was a [Spirituality] section in this site! or rename the existing? Blue skies. I'll definitely second that, CJEAN! Very good suggestion - thanks. Cheers |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2010, 12:49 AM
Post
#156
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
Thought and will, combined, could result in action, ...or inaction. i suppose a force, like gravity, could be thought of as will, without thought... Where as thought, with will, gave us the airplane. remember that gravity is incontestably connected to the forces of adhesion and cohesion together with the centrifugal and the centripetal forces. I often wonder why these forces and powers are never taken into consideration when the subject of gravity is talked about!! Why are they always ignored, as if they never existed? I mean, gravity cannot ever be properly explained unless these pair of mutual powers, with honesty, are taken into account!! I'm still mystified about this?? Cheers |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2010, 07:39 AM
Post
#157
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
The causes of gravity and time seem to almost be taboo subjects in science.
If a second took an hour, how would we ever know? It would still measure a second of time, to us. Gravity, cannot be shielded, only opposed, unlike light and other forms of radiant energy. People are both matter and energy, or thought controlled energy affecting matter through our biology. The fact that we are here, now, is weighed against all odds, so astronomical, that we should all be overwhelmed by this, alone, in absolute wonderment, our entire lives. ...most aren't. |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2010, 09:35 PM
Post
#158
|
|
|
Group: Extreme Forum Pilot Posts: 2,588 Joined: 31-December 07 From: Maui Member No.: 2,617 |
Boy…what a long read
Lunk, you should write a book. (really) One small question for the” T-man” Would it make any difference to you if the “Great Pyramid” was newer than 5100 years old and not built by (what we call) Egyptians? And I do not mean Martians! You folks may get a kick out of what "Really" may have happen. This post has been edited by elreb: Jun 21 2010, 10:03 PM |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2010, 11:35 PM
Post
#159
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 827 Joined: 1-July 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,315 |
Boy…what a long read Lunk, you should write a book. (really) One small question for the” T-man” Would it make any difference to you if the “Great Pyramid” was newer than 5100 years old and not built by (what we call) Egyptians? And I do not mean Martians! You folks may get a kick out of what "Really" may have happen. Hi elreb, if the Pyramid was built earlier or any other time than around 5100 years ago, then naturally one would simply accept this, but as the Pyramid was built ca. 5100 years ago, one now simply have to accept this fact! Some of the inhabitants in Egypt at that time were descendants from not only Atlantis, but others were also descendants from a cultural Empire called Khuum, that before its destruction was situated in the eastern part of Central Africa just below the Abyssinian Mountains SSW and SSE of these. it was from this Empire that for example 'Ra', 'Horus' and 'Nut' originated from. Cheers This post has been edited by Tamborine man: Jun 21 2010, 11:44 PM |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2010, 12:50 AM
Post
#160
|
|
|
Group: Extreme Forum Pilot Posts: 2,588 Joined: 31-December 07 From: Maui Member No.: 2,617 |
Hi Tam,
You of all people preach to “NOT” believe mainstream education. There is “Zero” published scientific proof as to the age of the Pyramids. The Sothic cycle or Canicular period of 1460 years is totally “Out to Lunch”. I could completely accept your geometry of the Great Pyramid and any relation it may have to the Stars. But only a mariner, as in a Pilot or Navigator would take an in depth concern into the Stars and the Planets. Before 1500 BC the native “Berbers” and the “Bantu” in Africa/Libya could barely build grass huts, let alone anything more complex. The Intelligence to build complex structures came from the Sea. Master Pilots of open water sailing originated in the “North Sea”. Pilots go back to and before Minoan Crete and ancient Greece, when local fishermen, were employed by incoming captains to safely bring into port their vessels and products. The Giza Plateau was an island during the flood season and most of the stones were carried by barges. Local natives were lucky if they could build a “Huckleberry Finn” raft. Nothing has changed. They still ride donkeys to work. Change comes from the outside. And to think, I thought you were English, home of the oldest prehistoric monument, oldest bridge and oldest boat! Hau'oli Makahiki Hou, |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 08:42 PM |