IPBFacebook




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Whistleblower Reveals "backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "lockout" Technology, Available Prior To 9/11 - Pilots For 9/11 Truth

rob balsamo
post May 17 2010, 06:58 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,830
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Whistleblower Reveals "Backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "Lockout" Technology Available Prior To 9/11

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Wayne Anderson, an Avionics Technician is interviewed by Rob Balsamo, Co-Founder, Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Wayne reveals his observations of a remote guidance test on a Boeing 757 in which technology was used to control the aircraft remotely, while also being able to "Lockout" the Flight Crew from overriding the autopilot system in order to regain control of the airplane. The following interview discusses the details of this test which was performed prior to September 11, 2001, the violations of FAA regulations and the possibilities using such technology.

Right Click and save target as... (46 min runtime, 21.1mb download)
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/RemoteCon...istleblower.mp3

or...

Just press play here...


Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html for full member list.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/join to join.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Geezer1776
post May 18 2010, 03:06 AM
Post #2





Group: Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: 27-June 07
Member No.: 1,267



Some thoughts:

Mr. Anderson, if legit, obviously holds an important piece. For his own safety, he should be sworn and deposed ASAP, with notarized copies of the depo made and distributed beyond hope of any but the most determined destruction. Keep in mind that eyewitness evidence of this kind is admissible in a court of law and, as such, could be exceedingly dangerous in the right (or, from the perps’ point of view, wrong,) circumstances.

People with skills and access need to check out Mr. Anderson’s claims:

Does/did the company he claims to work/have worked for actually exist?
Were one or more Boeing 757 aircraft actually worked on by this company during the time-frame claimed?
Do records of anomalies observed confirm any part of Mr. Anderson’s story?
Was/is there an engineer by the name he gives working for the company at the time he claims?

{Comment: The “engineer” conducting tests as described, using obviously highly proprietary/classified software, was almost certainly at least an “asset” if not a professional agent of at least one Agency. As such, on an operation of the kind in hand, he would be highly likely to have “disappeared” without a trace, a la Vreeland. Also, lack of any recorded anomalies corresponding to Mr. Anderson’s account would not, of themselves, necessarily discredit his claims, given the almost-certain “scrubbing” of data under the claimed circumstances.}

Assuming he remembers the identity of the “customer”, can he also offer guidance as to how we might learn the tail number of the aircraft, date(s) of service, and the names of any other participating personnel, with special emphasis on management-level people. It would be particularly useful to talk with any technicians who actually inspected the aircraft, looking for the “lockout” circuitry.

{Comment: As an ex-electroniker and QC engineer as well as somebody with at least a modicum of common sense, I feel fairly sure of several things:

Mission-critical hardware of the sort involved here will certainly have been subjected to a highly classified, thorough design review overseen, if not conducted, by an Agency, or elements of an Agency, of the U.S. Gov’t.

An important feature of the design is likely to have been ability to be hidden “in plain sight”, i.e. appearing to be an entirely legitimate, fully specified (and hence fully inspectable) element of the on-board avionics suite. (Since I’m neither an avionics tech nor an inspector, I’ve no way of knowing whether inspections go down to the level of actually counting the number of wires in cables and verifying their function, but short of this there seems to be no reason why an autopilot power lock-in relay and associated computer interface couldn’t be tucked into a convenient “black box” whose other functions are completely bona fide.)

Actual hardware manufacture is likely to have been handled, on a sub-contract basis, by an Agency “cut-out”, i.e. a wholly-controlled operation possibly set up exclusively to support this and related activities. This would also have been true of the requisite “back-door” control software; control access code would only be revealed by a detailed source-code review conducted by people not privy to the full real functions of the package – an eventuality most unlikely to unfold absent some major failure review.

Given the above, I see no reason why any Boeing personnel would necessarily have had to be knowingly involved; incoming avionics “black boxes” would have been inspected as to specified physical parameters, subjected to specified environmental and functional testing, installed in airframes, inspected, function-tested and duly certified. The mission-required “extra” wiring might have been labeled “spare” or some other benign term, hence never function-tested. Control software would have been function-tested per spec. – any hidden capabilities would almost certainly have escaped notice.

This, however, brings us to the one truly bizarre feature of this whole scenario: why on earth would the absolutely-critical function-testing of the remote-control, and especially the lockout, capabilities of this hardware/software system have been carried out in such a semi-public manner? Two plausible explanations come to mind:

1. Mr. Anderson’s account is entirely or substantially bogus, and none of the foregoing has any meaning, at least in the present context.

2. The exposure was quite deliberate, intended to plant a “breadcrumb” to be followed up at some future time by knowledgeable people in a position to do so. (The Agencies are NOT monolithic; both deliberate sabotage of illicit operations and their later exposure have occurred from within – thank God.)

Hope this proves of some use – good hunting!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kelana
post May 18 2010, 09:58 AM
Post #3





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 23
Joined: 14-May 10
Member No.: 5,052



Very interesting interview Rob. What could a pilot lockout function be needed for, other than underhand reasons? Nothing comes to mind...

QUOTE (Geezer1776 @ May 18 2010, 12:06 PM) *
This, however, brings us to the one truly bizarre feature of this whole scenario: why on earth would the absolutely-critical function-testing of the remote-control, and especially the lockout, capabilities of this hardware/software system have been carried out in such a semi-public manner?


Geezer1776 - I got the distinct impression that this lockout 'test' was anything but official and done on the side as an experiment and on this engineer's own initiative, as an add-on to the normal autopilot test. Seems the guy was just checking if, in fact, the software would do what he had been told. Not so bizarre then.

Keith
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- rob balsamo   Whistleblower Reveals "backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "lockout" Technology   May 17 2010, 06:58 PM
- - GroundPounder   dang..thought airbus was the only one to put ...   May 17 2010, 07:01 PM
|- - gugu2dede2   QUOTE (GroundPounder @ May 18 2010, 12:01...   Aug 28 2010, 03:37 AM
- - Geezer1776   Some thoughts: Mr. Anderson, if legit, obviously ...   May 18 2010, 03:06 AM
|- - rob balsamo   Wow, quite the reply from someone who registered t...   May 18 2010, 04:17 AM
|- - kelana   Very interesting interview Rob. What could a pilot...   May 18 2010, 09:58 AM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (Geezer1776 @ May 18 2010, 02:06 AM...   May 19 2010, 08:38 AM
- - amazed!   I'm leaving for a few days and have not listen...   May 18 2010, 07:55 AM
|- - Alan H.   QUOTE (amazed! @ May 16 2010, 11:55 A...   May 18 2010, 12:47 PM
- - Maha Mantra   I think the idea of a pilot lock-out feature was p...   May 18 2010, 11:02 AM
|- - kelana   QUOTE (Maha Mantra @ May 18 2010, 08:02 P...   May 18 2010, 11:31 AM
- - bluenorwayorg   All US civilian commercial passenger jets since 19...   May 18 2010, 11:33 AM
- - GroundPounder   great interview !!   May 18 2010, 11:57 AM
- - bluenorwayorg   A mode C and mode S radio transponder similar to t...   May 18 2010, 12:14 PM
- - thorn   Rob, Victor Thorn from WING TV and the American F...   May 18 2010, 12:54 PM
- - Devilsadvocate   Strange... I remember a press-conference shown on ...   May 18 2010, 01:49 PM
|- - Fizz   QUOTE (Devilsadvocate @ May 18 2010, 01:4...   May 18 2010, 02:11 PM
- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   Very interesting interview Rob , can I publish i...   May 18 2010, 02:11 PM
- - elreb   You think this is the guy he is talking about? Da...   May 18 2010, 02:26 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (elreb @ May 18 2010, 03:26 PM) You...   May 18 2010, 03:35 PM
|- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 16 2010, 07:35 P...   May 19 2010, 10:24 AM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ May 19 2010, ...   May 19 2010, 01:28 PM
- - bluenorwayorg   I'll have the above mentioned signaling protoc...   May 18 2010, 05:29 PM
- - elreb   If I have my data correct, by 1993 all that remain...   May 18 2010, 08:39 PM
|- - dlaliberte   QUOTE (elreb @ May 18 2010, 09:39 PM) Not...   May 18 2010, 11:29 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (dlaliberte @ May 18 2010, 10:29 PM...   May 20 2010, 09:57 PM
- - aerohead   His time frame falls inline with the time frame i ...   May 19 2010, 12:25 AM
- - aerohead   Btw, it doesnt matter what the acronym is, each mf...   May 19 2010, 01:22 AM
- - thorn   Mr. Anderson, I just completed an interview with ...   May 19 2010, 01:19 PM
- - elreb   Wayne, I almost think this thread is dead until y...   May 19 2010, 09:01 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (elreb @ May 19 2010, 08:01 PM) Way...   May 20 2010, 12:42 PM
- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 17 2010, 05:28 P...   May 20 2010, 06:42 AM
- - elreb   Wayne, Thanks, your doing just fine. All I said...   May 20 2010, 01:19 PM
- - elreb   FOR WHAT IS WORTH HISTORY In 1983, Chicago's ...   May 20 2010, 07:30 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (elreb @ May 20 2010, 06:30 PM) FOR...   May 24 2010, 08:27 PM
|- - Omega892R09   QUOTE (wayneanderson @ May 22 2010, 11:27...   May 30 2010, 12:06 PM
- - albertchampion   and when you get into the pritzkers, you run into ...   May 20 2010, 11:15 PM
- - rob balsamo   Off topic rhetoric split to here. http://pilotsfo...   May 21 2010, 11:47 AM
- - elreb   Referring to Dave's 757 autopilot test when yo...   May 21 2010, 03:36 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (elreb @ May 21 2010, 02:36 PM) Ref...   May 21 2010, 05:02 PM
- - elreb   Story begins in 1996 with the test on the 757 as d...   May 22 2010, 12:41 PM
- - Omega892R09   For what its worth listening to this interview, an...   May 22 2010, 01:36 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ May 22 2010, 12:36 P...   May 24 2010, 08:04 PM
- - amazed!   Aerohead Thanks for the great pictures out there ...   May 23 2010, 09:56 AM
- - Johnny Angel   A few years ago, I recall watching a short video o...   May 29 2010, 08:40 PM
|- - paranoia   QUOTE (Johnny Angel @ May 29 2010, 09:40 ...   May 29 2010, 10:14 PM
- - tnemelckram   Figures . . . . the Weather Channel . . . . in be...   May 29 2010, 11:10 PM
- - Maha Mantra   I recognized those test-dummies, they are actually...   May 30 2010, 11:39 PM
- - elreb   In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the...   Jun 2 2010, 12:36 PM
- - elreb   Wow… In 1984 they could remotely takeoff, fly and...   Jun 2 2010, 12:45 PM
- - elreb   This is really smoking gun material. FAA owned =...   Jun 2 2010, 05:28 PM
- - mhgaffney   Today, I tried without success to reach a David Pr...   Jun 14 2010, 02:34 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (mhgaffney @ Jun 14 2010, 01:34 PM)...   Jun 17 2010, 04:02 PM
- - mhgaffney   On June 21 I reached David Prentice at Continental...   Jun 28 2010, 01:00 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (mhgaffney @ Jun 28 2010, 02:00 PM)...   Jun 28 2010, 08:39 PM
- - paranoia   mr.gaffney, after some in-depth searching of...   Jun 28 2010, 04:09 PM
- - paranoia   also - if know any HAM operators or have access to...   Jun 28 2010, 04:18 PM
- - Ricochet   Hi Mark, welcome to P4T, I enjoy your writing.   Jun 28 2010, 05:14 PM
- - mhgaffney   Thanks, Paranoia. Those leads looks very promising...   Jun 28 2010, 07:45 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th December 2017 - 06:18 AM