IPBFacebook




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Whistleblower Reveals "backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "lockout" Technology, Available Prior To 9/11 - Pilots For 9/11 Truth

rob balsamo
post May 17 2010, 06:58 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,830
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Whistleblower Reveals "Backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "Lockout" Technology Available Prior To 9/11

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - Wayne Anderson, an Avionics Technician is interviewed by Rob Balsamo, Co-Founder, Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Wayne reveals his observations of a remote guidance test on a Boeing 757 in which technology was used to control the aircraft remotely, while also being able to "Lockout" the Flight Crew from overriding the autopilot system in order to regain control of the airplane. The following interview discusses the details of this test which was performed prior to September 11, 2001, the violations of FAA regulations and the possibilities using such technology.

Right Click and save target as... (46 min runtime, 21.1mb download)
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/RemoteCon...istleblower.mp3

or...

Just press play here...


Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials along with Mainstream Media refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html for full member list.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/join to join.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
elreb
post Jun 2 2010, 12:36 PM
Post #2





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 2,589
Joined: 31-December 07
From: Maui
Member No.: 2,617



In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) teamed-up in a unique flight experiment called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), to test the impact of a Boeing 720 aircraft using standard fuel with an additive designed to suppress fire. The additive FM-9, a high molecular-weight long chain polymer, when blended with Jet-A fuel had demonstrated the capability to inhibit ignition and flame propagation of the released fuel in simulated impact tests.

On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet. It then began a descent-to-landing to a specially prepared runway on the east side of Rogers Dry Lake. Final approach was along the roughly 3.8-degree glide slope. The landing gear was left retracted. Passing the decision height of 150 feet above ground level (AGL), the aircraft was slightly to the right of the desired path. Just above that decision point at which the pilot was to execute a "go-around," there appeared to be enough altitude to maneuver back to the centerline of the runway. Data acquisition systems had been activated, and the aircraft was committed to impact. It contacted the ground, left wing low. The fire and smoke took over an hour to extinguish.

This flight, called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), was the culmination of more than a year of preparation in a joint research project by NASA and the FAA to test the effectiveness of anti-misting kerosene (AMK) in a so-called survivable impact. Added to typical Jet A fuel, the AMK was designed to suppress the fireball that can result from an impact in which the airstream causes spilled fuel to vaporize into a mist.

The plane was also instrumented for a variety of other impact-survivability experiments, including new seat designs, flight data recorders, galley and stowage-bin attachments, cabin fire-proof materials, and burn-resistant windows. Crash forces were measured, and a full complement of instrumented crash test dummies was carried on the flight.

The aircraft was remotely flown by NASA research pilot Fitzhugh (Fitz) Fulton from the NASA Dryden Remotely ControlledVehicle Facility. Previously, the Boeing 720 had been flown on 14 practice flights with safety pilots onboard. During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted takeoffs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.

It was planned that the aircraft would land wings-level and exactly on the centerline during the CID, thus allowing the fuselage to remain intact as the wings were sliced open by eight posts cemented into the runway. The Boeing 720 landed askew and caused a cabin fire when burning fuel was able to enter the fuselage.

It was not exactly the impact that was hoped for, but research from the CID program yielded new data on impact survivability which helped establish new FAA rules regarding fire prevention and retardant materials. Although proponents argued that AMK prevented a hotter, more catastrophic fire during the CID, FAA requirements for the additive were put on the back burner.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- rob balsamo   Whistleblower Reveals "backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "lockout" Technology   May 17 2010, 06:58 PM
- - GroundPounder   dang..thought airbus was the only one to put ...   May 17 2010, 07:01 PM
|- - gugu2dede2   QUOTE (GroundPounder @ May 18 2010, 12:01...   Aug 28 2010, 03:37 AM
- - Geezer1776   Some thoughts: Mr. Anderson, if legit, obviously ...   May 18 2010, 03:06 AM
|- - rob balsamo   Wow, quite the reply from someone who registered t...   May 18 2010, 04:17 AM
|- - kelana   Very interesting interview Rob. What could a pilot...   May 18 2010, 09:58 AM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (Geezer1776 @ May 18 2010, 02:06 AM...   May 19 2010, 08:38 AM
- - amazed!   I'm leaving for a few days and have not listen...   May 18 2010, 07:55 AM
|- - Alan H.   QUOTE (amazed! @ May 16 2010, 11:55 A...   May 18 2010, 12:47 PM
- - Maha Mantra   I think the idea of a pilot lock-out feature was p...   May 18 2010, 11:02 AM
|- - kelana   QUOTE (Maha Mantra @ May 18 2010, 08:02 P...   May 18 2010, 11:31 AM
- - bluenorwayorg   All US civilian commercial passenger jets since 19...   May 18 2010, 11:33 AM
- - GroundPounder   great interview !!   May 18 2010, 11:57 AM
- - bluenorwayorg   A mode C and mode S radio transponder similar to t...   May 18 2010, 12:14 PM
- - thorn   Rob, Victor Thorn from WING TV and the American F...   May 18 2010, 12:54 PM
- - Devilsadvocate   Strange... I remember a press-conference shown on ...   May 18 2010, 01:49 PM
|- - Fizz   QUOTE (Devilsadvocate @ May 18 2010, 01:4...   May 18 2010, 02:11 PM
- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   Very interesting interview Rob , can I publish i...   May 18 2010, 02:11 PM
- - elreb   You think this is the guy he is talking about? Da...   May 18 2010, 02:26 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (elreb @ May 18 2010, 03:26 PM) You...   May 18 2010, 03:35 PM
|- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 16 2010, 07:35 P...   May 19 2010, 10:24 AM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ May 19 2010, ...   May 19 2010, 01:28 PM
- - bluenorwayorg   I'll have the above mentioned signaling protoc...   May 18 2010, 05:29 PM
- - elreb   If I have my data correct, by 1993 all that remain...   May 18 2010, 08:39 PM
|- - dlaliberte   QUOTE (elreb @ May 18 2010, 09:39 PM) Not...   May 18 2010, 11:29 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (dlaliberte @ May 18 2010, 10:29 PM...   May 20 2010, 09:57 PM
- - aerohead   His time frame falls inline with the time frame i ...   May 19 2010, 12:25 AM
- - aerohead   Btw, it doesnt matter what the acronym is, each mf...   May 19 2010, 01:22 AM
- - thorn   Mr. Anderson, I just completed an interview with ...   May 19 2010, 01:19 PM
- - elreb   Wayne, I almost think this thread is dead until y...   May 19 2010, 09:01 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (elreb @ May 19 2010, 08:01 PM) Way...   May 20 2010, 12:42 PM
- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 17 2010, 05:28 P...   May 20 2010, 06:42 AM
- - elreb   Wayne, Thanks, your doing just fine. All I said...   May 20 2010, 01:19 PM
- - elreb   FOR WHAT IS WORTH HISTORY In 1983, Chicago's ...   May 20 2010, 07:30 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (elreb @ May 20 2010, 06:30 PM) FOR...   May 24 2010, 08:27 PM
|- - Omega892R09   QUOTE (wayneanderson @ May 22 2010, 11:27...   May 30 2010, 12:06 PM
- - albertchampion   and when you get into the pritzkers, you run into ...   May 20 2010, 11:15 PM
- - rob balsamo   Off topic rhetoric split to here. http://pilotsfo...   May 21 2010, 11:47 AM
- - elreb   Referring to Dave's 757 autopilot test when yo...   May 21 2010, 03:36 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (elreb @ May 21 2010, 02:36 PM) Ref...   May 21 2010, 05:02 PM
- - elreb   Story begins in 1996 with the test on the 757 as d...   May 22 2010, 12:41 PM
- - Omega892R09   For what its worth listening to this interview, an...   May 22 2010, 01:36 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ May 22 2010, 12:36 P...   May 24 2010, 08:04 PM
- - amazed!   Aerohead Thanks for the great pictures out there ...   May 23 2010, 09:56 AM
- - Johnny Angel   A few years ago, I recall watching a short video o...   May 29 2010, 08:40 PM
|- - paranoia   QUOTE (Johnny Angel @ May 29 2010, 09:40 ...   May 29 2010, 10:14 PM
- - tnemelckram   Figures . . . . the Weather Channel . . . . in be...   May 29 2010, 11:10 PM
- - Maha Mantra   I recognized those test-dummies, they are actually...   May 30 2010, 11:39 PM
- - elreb   In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the...   Jun 2 2010, 12:36 PM
- - elreb   Wow… In 1984 they could remotely takeoff, fly and...   Jun 2 2010, 12:45 PM
- - elreb   This is really smoking gun material. FAA owned =...   Jun 2 2010, 05:28 PM
- - mhgaffney   Today, I tried without success to reach a David Pr...   Jun 14 2010, 02:34 PM
|- - wayneanderson   QUOTE (mhgaffney @ Jun 14 2010, 01:34 PM)...   Jun 17 2010, 04:02 PM
- - mhgaffney   On June 21 I reached David Prentice at Continental...   Jun 28 2010, 01:00 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (mhgaffney @ Jun 28 2010, 02:00 PM)...   Jun 28 2010, 08:39 PM
- - paranoia   mr.gaffney, after some in-depth searching of...   Jun 28 2010, 04:09 PM
- - paranoia   also - if know any HAM operators or have access to...   Jun 28 2010, 04:18 PM
- - Ricochet   Hi Mark, welcome to P4T, I enjoy your writing.   Jun 28 2010, 05:14 PM
- - mhgaffney   Thanks, Paranoia. Those leads looks very promising...   Jun 28 2010, 07:45 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th December 2017 - 11:26 PM