Small Jet Crash Vs. Pentagon Crash – Interesting Comparison Options

[TheSurgeon]

Small Jet Crash vs. Pentagon Crash – Interesting Comparison

On 2 February 2005, a small jet ran off the runway at Teterboro, New Jersey airport during takeoff at 110 knots (127 mph = 204 kph). It went through an airport perimeter fence; across a six-lane highway (where it struck a vehicle); and into a parking lot (where it hit 5 vehicles) before hitting a warehouse. The jet was a Bombardier Canadair Challenger CL-600.

(IMG:http://i47.tinypic.com/2s6rb54.jpg)

(IMG:http://i50.tinypic.com/30ddk6v.jpg)

(IMG:http://i50.tinypic.com/33c6q1d.jpg)

(IMG:http://i46.tinypic.com/b85n2e.jpg)

(IMG:http://i49.tinypic.com/2zhfqxi.jpg)

(IMG:http://i50.tinypic.com/epes01.jpg)

(IMG:http://i49.tinypic.com/2e4c2g5.jpg)

(IMG:http://i47.tinypic.com/4js4gi.jpg)

(IMG:http://i48.tinypic.com/2ekp5b5.jpg)

The captain told investigators that he applied brakes, speed brakes, and thrust reversers in an attempt to stop the airplane. The NTSB report states that the plane was moving at 85 knots (98 mph = 158 kph) when it was 70 feet (21 m) from the building. The FDR stopped recording at this point since the plane was on the ground.

Compare the damage to the jet and warehouse compared to the supposed Boeing 757-223 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon. The Challenger impacted the warehouse at an approximately 15 degree angle (NTSB report). The airplane came to a stop with an approximate 30 degree angle to the building, which was probably caused by the plane’s left wing hitting the red SUV / jeep (which can be seen in the photo above) prior to hitting the building. The “757” impacted the Pentagon at a 45 degree angle.

Right Wing Damage

The Challenger’s right wing sheared off from the impact with the building. A Challenger’s wings are much shorter than a 757’s; and the engines are not mounted on a Challenger’s wings, unlike a 757. A 757 has much stronger wings because of their size, the weight of the aircraft and since the engines are wing mounted. Therefore, the argument that a 757’s wings can “bend” and “fold back” can be clearly shown as nonsense.

Notice the damage to the building caused by the right wing. The Pentagon also has masonry construction. While the Pentagon hit occurred at the recently strengthened wedge against car/truck bombs, it was strengthened against blast effects to reduce casualties from flying debris – not significantly strengthened against huge kinetic impacts. This additional strength would have had very little effect in minimizing external damage from a Boeing 757 wing traveling at +300 mph.

Left Wing Damage

The Challenger’s outboard left wing sheared off from hitting the red SUV / jeep in the parking lot. The red SUV has been pushed against the building.

Bombardier Challenger CL-600
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=123

Wing span 61‘10“ (18.85m)
Length 68‘5“ (20.85 m)
Height 20‘8“ (6.30 m)
Fuselage Diameter: 8’10” (2.69 m)

Boeing 757-200

Wing span 124‘10“ (38.05 m)
Length 155‘ 3‘ (47.32 m)
Hheight 44‘ 6“ (13.56 m)
Fuselage Diameter: 12’6” (3.81 m)

NTSB Report for Challenger Crash
http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2006/AAR0604.pdf

No links are provided for the photos. Google Teterboro+Challenger+Bombadier+crash

[amazed!]

That is an interesting comparison.

We know that the Pentagon events were staged, and there was no 757 there.

[tnemelckram]

That is an interesting comparison. We know that the Pentagon events were staged, and there was no 757 there.

But this was 9-11!!! Every durn fool wit a lick of sense knows that made the same different, and different the same! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/teach.gif)

[Paul]

Small Jet Crash vs. Pentagon Crash – Interesting Comparison

On 2 February 2005, a small jet ran off the runway at Teterboro, New Jersey airport during takeoff at 110 knots (127 mph = 204 kph). It went through an airport perimeter fence; across a six-lane highway (where it struck a vehicle); and into a parking lot (where it hit 5 vehicles) before hitting a warehouse. The jet was a Bombardier Canadair Challenger CL-600.

So in other words there is no way the wings could have folded back as AA 77 hit the pentagon they would have sheared off
so where is all the debris from the wings outside the pentagon? And how did one AA 77 engines end up inside the pentagon
when the wings did not penetrate through the wall how did it enter and where did it enter if this is the case? And also where is
the second engine boeing 757's such as AA 77 have two massive turbo fan engines so where is the other engine? And where
any parts of a second engine ever found at the pentagon? I only ask this because i have never or dont remeber seeing any
parts from a second engine at the pentagon.

And most importantly of all and I think we should really take notice of the fact that we have a new proven liar since it is
physically impossible for the wings on a boeing 757 to fold back. Who was that reporter guy that said he saw the wings of
the plane fold back as it crashed into and entered the pentagon? I think his name might be Mike Walter not sure, well atleast
now caught someone lying for the governments OCT by claiming he saw something that is physically impossible happen at the
pentagon on 9/11 this is really big we now have a 9/11 media witness to the events on 9/11 lying his ass off and now a proven liar.

BUSTED IDIOT

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif)

[FreshKills]

Wow! Very interesting similarities between this proven aircraft crash and the 9/11 Pentagon event. To me, the main difference is that a REAL AIRPLANE is shown in the photographic record of THIS one...unlike, well....you know.

This post has been edited by FreshKills: Aug 6 2010, 06:16 PM

[amazed!]

Good questions Paul!

With the OTC, there are more questions than answers, for the person with some measure of curiosity. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif)