IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
News Report 93 Was Shot Down !!!! Missing Piece Of Evidence !, Genuine 9/11 news release where it is openly stated 93 was shot down &

911thology
post Aug 9 2010, 07:50 AM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: 24-March 10
Member No.: 4,979



Many people still remember that during September 11 contemporary coverage many news agencies reported that the 4th hijacked passenger flight was shot down - it was reported by at least CNN, BBC, NBC, ABC, FOX. Even a pilot who actually shot down the aircraft was present himself in the CNN news release and said a few words.

However, later it became virtually impossible to find that seditious footage. It seem that the US Government took the greatest effort to quash the public distribution of that dangerous piece of 9/11 news and most probably the US agents simply redeemed all copies of that footage from all people who could possess them and who could publish them on YouTube. Because if not, this news release would exist on YouTube all these years - along with footage of the WTC collapse and other 9/11 evidence. But, as everyone could see, it was not so in reality. No one has ever been able to successfully publish that important news release.

Now, after many years of research, this missing piece of evidence was, at last, discovered and made publicly available! Don't miss the point - it is not an infamous slip of the tongue by Rumsfleld that is known to many. This is an OFFICIAL PUBLIC NEWS REPORT where it is OPENLY STATED that the US Air Force jet fighter SHOT DOWN the 4th passenger aircraft ! This is EVIDENCE admissible in the court-room!

Download links for the footage are here: http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/911_...3_shot_down.htm

Enjoy, you 911-truthers!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Aug 9 2010, 03:39 PM
Post #2





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,930
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



It might be admissible in the courtroom, but that does not make the statement true.

I remember very well the story that UAL93 had been shot down. I watched the TV that morning with, among others, another pilot who was former USN fighter type. We both applauded that the 4th ship had been shot down, and believed it completely.

Along with that story was circulated the story that there was a debris trail, and that the FBI had showed up at the EOC dispatch center for Johnstown PA and seized the tapes of all 911 calls that day, including the now infamous conversation "Todd Beamer" had with his "mother"

Yes, they wove a very intricate weave, now all exposed to be lies.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DoYouEverWonder
post Aug 9 2010, 03:51 PM
Post #3





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 770
Joined: 1-February 09
Member No.: 4,096



Only problem with this theory - You Tube didn't start until 2005.

It wasn't very easy for most people to upload videos before that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sanders
post Aug 10 2010, 01:25 PM
Post #4



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 7,990
Joined: 13-September 06
Member No.: 49



QUOTE
This is EVIDENCE admissible in the court-room!


Don't expect any help from the courts in uncovering the truth - the courts are owned - just like the media. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the International Bar Association in the City of London ... need I say more? There might be some well meaning honest judges out there, but they are outnumbered by those with a vested interest in defending the status quo, and they have a million excuses in their bag of tricks they can whip out to quelch any attempt to uncover the 9//11 hoax, which they have successfully done several times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rickysa
post Aug 10 2010, 03:56 PM
Post #5





Group: Contributor
Posts: 289
Joined: 18-February 08
From: USA: N.C.
Member No.: 2,762



would it be worthwhile to copy the footage to the Library section? Honestly, kinda dubious about downloading something recommended by a first-time poster dunno.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
911thology
post Aug 19 2010, 05:49 PM
Post #6





Group: Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: 24-March 10
Member No.: 4,979



QUOTE (Rickysa @ Aug 11 2010, 02:56 AM) *
would it be worthwhile to copy the footage to the Library section? Honestly, kinda dubious about downloading something recommended by a first-time poster dunno.gif


Now there is one published on YouTube for those who are afraid of downloading:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMrF1caOmOw

This one is in English, by the way (the first time was Russian NTV news, in Russain). This one is FOX news - twice repeated that the 4th aircraft was SHOT DOWN but not by the military, by F-16 belonging to National Air Guard - even Wing No. is mentioned and one officer also says a few words.

Enjoy !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DoYouEverWonder
post Aug 19 2010, 06:31 PM
Post #7





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 770
Joined: 1-February 09
Member No.: 4,096



QUOTE (Sanders @ Aug 10 2010, 01:25 PM) *
Don't expect any help from the courts in uncovering the truth - the courts are owned - just like the media. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the International Bar Association in the City of London ... need I say more? There might be some well meaning honest judges out there, but they are outnumbered by those with a vested interest in defending the status quo, and they have a million excuses in their bag of tricks they can whip out to quelch any attempt to uncover the 9//11 hoax, which they have successfully done several times.

Especially since the Supreme Court ruled against Judy Wood's Qui Tam Suit.

Makes it real hard for anyone else to sue NIST again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ricochet
post Aug 20 2010, 01:19 PM
Post #8





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 746
Joined: 25-April 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,225



QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Aug 19 2010, 03:31 PM) *
Especially since the Supreme Court ruled against Judy Wood's Qui Tam Suit.

Makes it real hard for anyone else to sue NIST again.

Off topic but mission accomplished, that was the whole point. To make it impossible to bring a lawsuit against NIST.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Aug 22 2010, 03:27 PM
Post #9





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,930
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



"Done and done", as the ad says.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ricochet
post Aug 22 2010, 08:47 PM
Post #10





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 746
Joined: 25-April 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,225



also remember, there is no verification of the debris field. The one shown does not look like a relaimed mine. Looks more residential. UAL 93 or ??? something clearly was whacked,
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd October 2014 - 03:55 AM