IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

News Report 93 Was Shot Down !!!! Missing Piece Of Evidence !, Genuine 9/11 news release where it is openly stated 93 was shot down &

911thology
post Aug 9 2010, 06:50 AM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: 24-March 10
Member No.: 4,979



Many people still remember that during September 11 contemporary coverage many news agencies reported that the 4th hijacked passenger flight was shot down - it was reported by at least CNN, BBC, NBC, ABC, FOX. Even a pilot who actually shot down the aircraft was present himself in the CNN news release and said a few words.

However, later it became virtually impossible to find that seditious footage. It seem that the US Government took the greatest effort to quash the public distribution of that dangerous piece of 9/11 news and most probably the US agents simply redeemed all copies of that footage from all people who could possess them and who could publish them on YouTube. Because if not, this news release would exist on YouTube all these years - along with footage of the WTC collapse and other 9/11 evidence. But, as everyone could see, it was not so in reality. No one has ever been able to successfully publish that important news release.

Now, after many years of research, this missing piece of evidence was, at last, discovered and made publicly available! Don't miss the point - it is not an infamous slip of the tongue by Rumsfleld that is known to many. This is an OFFICIAL PUBLIC NEWS REPORT where it is OPENLY STATED that the US Air Force jet fighter SHOT DOWN the 4th passenger aircraft ! This is EVIDENCE admissible in the court-room!

Download links for the footage are here: http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/911_...3_shot_down.htm

Enjoy, you 911-truthers!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Sanders
post Aug 10 2010, 12:25 PM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 7,990
Joined: 13-September 06
Member No.: 49



QUOTE
This is EVIDENCE admissible in the court-room!


Don't expect any help from the courts in uncovering the truth - the courts are owned - just like the media. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the International Bar Association in the City of London ... need I say more? There might be some well meaning honest judges out there, but they are outnumbered by those with a vested interest in defending the status quo, and they have a million excuses in their bag of tricks they can whip out to quelch any attempt to uncover the 9//11 hoax, which they have successfully done several times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DoYouEverWonder
post Aug 19 2010, 05:31 PM
Post #3





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 770
Joined: 1-February 09
Member No.: 4,096



QUOTE (Sanders @ Aug 10 2010, 01:25 PM) *
Don't expect any help from the courts in uncovering the truth - the courts are owned - just like the media. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the International Bar Association in the City of London ... need I say more? There might be some well meaning honest judges out there, but they are outnumbered by those with a vested interest in defending the status quo, and they have a million excuses in their bag of tricks they can whip out to quelch any attempt to uncover the 9//11 hoax, which they have successfully done several times.

Especially since the Supreme Court ruled against Judy Wood's Qui Tam Suit.

Makes it real hard for anyone else to sue NIST again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ricochet
post Aug 20 2010, 12:19 PM
Post #4





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 746
Joined: 25-April 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,225



QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Aug 19 2010, 03:31 PM) *
Especially since the Supreme Court ruled against Judy Wood's Qui Tam Suit.

Makes it real hard for anyone else to sue NIST again.

Off topic but mission accomplished, that was the whole point. To make it impossible to bring a lawsuit against NIST.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd December 2014 - 08:31 AM