IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Seconds From Disaster - Pentagon 9-11, National Geographic Presentation

Nic
post Aug 9 2010, 09:06 AM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 11
Joined: 4-March 09
Member No.: 4,187



Hi Rob,

Perhaps this message should be put under alternative theories or entertainment:

Part 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ayc4wuPeYqc
Part 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7Rz0K3BuVk...feature=channel

The Pentagon lost track of the plane on their radar? 530 mph?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paranoia
post Aug 10 2010, 12:16 AM
Post #2


dig deeper
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 972
Joined: 16-October 06
From: arlington va
Member No.: 96



thanks for posting this nic, but just so you know - the show originally aired in 2004:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0972132/
26 October 2004 (Season 1, Episode 12)

-so its not new. but since you've brought it up, here are some things that stick out (for me):

(IMG:http://i422.photobucket.com/albums/pp306/22205_911/911/NATGEOCPMPARED01.jpg)



(IMG:http://i422.photobucket.com/albums/pp306/22205_911/911/NATGEOCPMPARED02.jpg)
note: in the above the plane also contradicts the official path because the loop its flying is smaller and
does not go outside of arlington (matches dca atc chris stephenson's "disappeared behind some buildings" quote),
whereas the official path has it reaching at least 5 miles further west (near or over springfield)


(IMG:http://i422.photobucket.com/albums/pp306/22205_911/911/NATGEOCPMPARED03.jpg)


-even though natgeo's propaganda piece tries hard to corroborate the official story, apparently they hadnt yet discovered that there was/is a discrepancy in the official path versus the true path - the one that was witnessed by people in that last stretch of the plane's approach. so without knowing it, they (on several occasions) actually CONTRADICT the official path of the plane, instead of reinforcing it. most likely thats a result of them (natgeo) basing their piece on actual witness recollections instead of strictly on official lies. now they dont get the path exactly right, but they are much closer to the TRUE PATH than they are to the alleged official path of the plane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Aug 10 2010, 10:10 AM
Post #3





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



Yep, it looks like Nat Geo was on the right track in 2004 before the 2006 NTSB data was released.

The eyewitnesses prove the plane flew over DC.:
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/gifs/dcnationalgeo.gif)

Looped around the airport and flew directly over the Navy Annex:
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/gifs/nationalgeonorth.gif)

And north of the Citgo:
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/gifs/nocanimation.gif)

Just like they said.

But nothing like what the NTSB said:
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/flight%20path/ntsbvsdcpath.jpg)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 11:37 AM