IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Debate Challenge And Questions For 911blogger, Letter just sent to 911Blogger.

Atomicbomb
post Sep 5 2010, 09:29 AM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: 28-January 10
Member No.: 4,870



I just sent the following letter to the entire 911Blogger team:


"911Blogger Owners and Moderators,

My name is Adam Ruff. I am a former contributor to 911Blogger and reporter for Unspun Newz http://www.youtube.com/user/unspunnewz?feature=mhum. I would like to ask you all some questions on the record regarding your involvement with 911Blogger and would appreciate your response to them for my upcoming report on 911Blogger and the Citizens Investigation Team (CIT). Please reply back individually or as a group with your thoughts about each question written below the question itself so your responses will not get confused or be misunderstood. Thank you.

Q: Now that such a large number of people have been banned from 911Blogger apparently without violating the site rules and without an explanation do you feel the site is fulfilling it's purpose better today then it was prior to the mass banning? If so can you explain how the site has improved or how the truth movement has benefited from the mass banning?

Q: What is official 911Blogger editorial policy regarding CIT's pentagon evidence and regarding CIT supporters posting on 911Blogger?

Q: What is 911Bloggers official position in regard to censorship and the 1st amendment to the US Constitution? Can you elaborate on that position specifically as it relates to private property rights vs. free speech rights?

Q: In light of the recent endorsements of CIT from Barrie Zwicker http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu5wzJtSMhc and Dwain Deets http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYGkiYmVUmg , endorsements which were very critical of censorship efforts against CIT within the truth movement, do you feel that it may have been ill advised to take such a harsh stance against CIT yourselves or do you feel as though your stance is justified and correct? Could you explain your answer?

Q: How involved were each of you personally in deciding who would be banned from 911Blogger? Did you make the decisions in each case yourself or was it a committee decision involving all/some of the other moderators as to who would be banned?

Q: Do you contend that those individuals banned without explanation over the last few months were not banned because of their support for CIT but for some other reason? If so why were they banned and how do you explain the large numbers of CIT supporters in the banned group?

Q: Do you consider 911Bloggers efforts to suppress CIT's evidence and purge CIT's supporters from your site to be successful? If so how do you measure that success?

Q: If it should turn out that CIT, Barrie Zwicker, Dwain Deets, and the many CIT supporters purged from 911Blogger were proved correct in their conclusions about the pentagon attack (I.E. the fly over happened, the pole damage was staged, etc) how will you restore 911Bloggers reputation and make up for the tremendous damage that has been done to the truth movement and to it's members who were wrongly silenced?

Q: Are you willing to debate CIT on the subject of the pentagon provided a neutral debate setting, established debate rules, and equal representative teams can be arranged? If not can you tell us why you choose to decline such a debate?

Q: If none of you are willing to answer any of the above questions is there any statement you would like to make on behalf of 911Blogger that you would like me to include in my report?

I look forward to your timely response,

Adam Ruff
Unspun Newz

P.S. I have BCC'd a number of truth movement members on this message in order to keep all this out in the open."


I will post any replies I get here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Atomicbomb
post Sep 25 2010, 10:27 PM
Post #2





Group: Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: 28-January 10
Member No.: 4,870



Could everyone who has been banned by 911Blogger (for discussing or defending CIT or P4T evidence) please drop me a note here so my upcomming report will be accurate as to how many people have been banned or blocked from posting there (I suspect when all is totalled up it will be dozens if not more). Please include the name you use on Blogger to post and let me know if you know of anyone else who was gagged and disappeared from Blogger that is not listed here.

Right now these names are the ones I know of for sure that have been blocked from posting at Blogger.

1. Craig and Aldo from CIT
2. Rob Balsamo
3. Kevin Barrett
4. Stefan
5. Adam Syed
6. Onesliceshort
7. Lillyann
8. Myself (Adam Ruff)
9. SanderO (what is your screen name on Blogger, is it also SanderO there?) Were you banned after discussing CIT or P4T issues?

I am not sure if Barrie Zwicker and/or Dwain Deets have been blocked from posting or not but I do know their endorsements of CIT never saw the light of day at Blogger. I would like to publish as complete a list as possible in my report so any help any of you can be towards that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

This post has been edited by Atomicbomb: Sep 25 2010, 10:33 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Atomicbomb   Debate Challenge And Questions For 911blogger   Sep 5 2010, 09:29 AM
- - amazed!   Good luck with THAT dude!   Sep 5 2010, 02:14 PM
- - onesliceshort   They'll have to answer some time. Ridiculous ...   Sep 5 2010, 03:28 PM
- - DoYouEverWonder   I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for their re...   Sep 5 2010, 05:38 PM
|- - Atomicbomb   QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Sep 5 2010, 03:3...   Sep 6 2010, 06:35 AM
- - StefanS   You won't get a response from any of them, exc...   Sep 10 2010, 12:29 PM
- - SanderO   The problem is that blogger has acted improperly i...   Sep 10 2010, 06:33 PM
|- - Atomicbomb   QUOTE (SanderO @ Sep 10 2010, 04:33 PM) T...   Sep 13 2010, 04:36 PM
- - amazed!   Humans tend to censor. They tend to suppress idea...   Sep 13 2010, 04:37 PM
|- - Atomicbomb   QUOTE (amazed! @ Sep 13 2010, 02:37 P...   Sep 13 2010, 10:43 PM
- - albertchampion   it is just not the msm. virtually no purportedly p...   Sep 14 2010, 01:43 AM
- - onesliceshort   This sums up the current situation IMHO. Not to s...   Sep 14 2010, 08:06 AM
- - SanderO   While the censorship may be the work of "infi...   Sep 14 2010, 09:32 AM
|- - Sanders   QUOTE (SanderO @ Sep 18 2010, 09:32 AM) W...   Sep 14 2010, 11:09 AM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (Sanders)Generally, these situations develop...   Sep 14 2010, 10:19 PM
|- - Atomicbomb   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Sep 14 2010, 08:19...   Sep 15 2010, 06:29 PM
- - DoYouEverWonder   Any forum that kicks off good researchers for the ...   Sep 15 2010, 07:04 PM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Sep 16 2010, 01...   Sep 15 2010, 08:27 PM
- - SanderO   This "problem" is not only found at Blog...   Sep 15 2010, 07:57 PM
- - Atomicbomb   Could everyone who has been banned by 911Blogger (...   Sep 25 2010, 10:27 PM
|- - SwingDangler   QUOTE (Atomicbomb @ Sep 24 2010, 01:27 AM...   Jan 26 2011, 03:13 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (SwingDangler @ Jan 26 2011, 03:13 ...   Jan 26 2011, 04:41 PM
- - Atomicbomb   Update to the list of banned or queued at 911Blogg...   Sep 26 2010, 02:47 AM
- - SanderO   add SanderO to your list of banned and censored   Sep 26 2010, 08:27 AM
|- - Atomicbomb   QUOTE (SanderO @ Sep 26 2010, 06:27 AM) a...   Sep 26 2010, 03:28 PM
|- - SanderO   QUOTE (Atomicbomb @ Sep 26 2010, 04:28 PM...   Sep 26 2010, 06:47 PM
- - Atomicbomb   The current list of known individuals banned or bl...   Sep 26 2010, 04:45 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (Atomicbomb @ Sep 26 2010, 05:45 PM...   Sep 26 2010, 08:12 PM
|- - woody   Okay...they finally threw me out, too. It was Bur...   Oct 27 2010, 03:58 PM
- - P45   What a gallery of rogues   Sep 26 2010, 05:46 PM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (P45 @ Sep 26 2010, 11:46 PM) What ...   Sep 26 2010, 06:35 PM
- - SanderO   First Amenedment: Congress shall make no law resp...   Oct 30 2010, 06:43 AM
- - amazed!   SanderO The Constitution constrains the US govern...   Oct 30 2010, 09:37 AM
- - tumetuestumefaisdubien   They ban people even for reporting them their own ...   Jan 26 2011, 08:03 PM
- - Tamborine man   Victronix, the new minister for propaganda and gat...   Jan 27 2011, 11:41 PM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (Tamborine man @ Jan 28 2011, 05:41...   Feb 5 2011, 10:52 AM
- - GroundPounder   vicky's background is in psychology if i remem...   Feb 5 2011, 01:38 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th November 2014 - 02:36 AM