IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
According To Bts Flights 11 And 77 Never Existed

phaeton666
post Jan 30 2011, 07:00 AM
Post #21





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 37
Joined: 12-September 07
Member No.: 2,101



See also here for a graphical presentation of some FDR data and BTS entries for AA77.
BTW this should definitely be in the AA77 section...

This post has been edited by phaeton666: Jan 30 2011, 07:00 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elreb
post Jan 30 2011, 05:12 PM
Post #22





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 2,589
Joined: 31-December 07
From: Maui
Member No.: 2,617



QUOTE (phaeton666 @ Jan 30 2011, 01:00 AM) *
BTW this should definitely be in the AA77 section...

Best we can do is copy and move to the correct section...

But can you explain why Ronni was selling AA11 in September 2007?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phaeton666
post Jan 31 2011, 05:01 AM
Post #23





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 37
Joined: 12-September 07
Member No.: 2,101



QUOTE (elreb @ Jan 28 2011, 08:12 PM) *
But can you explain why Ronni was selling AA11 in September 2007?

Hey, man, if you can get Ronni to answer this under oath before a court of law, this is your chance to write history.
Also, for whom did he sell it and to whom, and where is it now.
This is one lawsuit I would personally attend... I'm dreaming.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tumetuestumefais...
post Jan 31 2011, 05:53 AM
Post #24





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,103
Joined: 7-November 07
From: Prague or France
Member No.: 2,452



See my BTS database compilation for the 9/11 planes and flights. It was made last summer using comparison of the downloaded and online database (which differ, because they're generated differently - and that's probably all what is the Holmgren stuff about - he most probably never seen the real BTS database, just it's online representation...). There were still no records for "AA11" and "AA77" on 9/11, but there were records for "UA175/N612UA" and "UA93/N591UA". You can also find there the "AA77" fleet No. N5BPAA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elreb
post Jan 31 2011, 01:11 PM
Post #25





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 2,589
Joined: 31-December 07
From: Maui
Member No.: 2,617



I forget which one it was...either 0011 or 0077...didn't ever fly on Tuesdays but 9-11 was a Tuesday...hum
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
727fan
post Aug 17 2011, 07:56 AM
Post #26





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 14
Joined: 5-July 11
Member No.: 6,033



QUOTE (woody @ Oct 7 2010, 03:15 PM) *
Here's the radio transcript between Boston Tower and Flight 11, beginning with the gate departure:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/16/national...T-FLIGHT11.html

For Flight 77, there exists a transcript, too. But I'm too lazy to search it. Google is your friend.


Woody, first you deserve a big thank you from anyone who wants to learn more about what really happened, so Thank You.

Now is any person always right? It was not right of people to attack you, or call you a disinfo agent.

If you are honest with yourself, you will see that even you cannot always be right.

This is relevant now even though I deeply respect you personally and your work also and have learned a tremendous amount from your very informative woodybox blogspot blog, most especially about Cleveland Hopkins Airport, the likelihood that some or all were plane swaps, Delta 89 and 1989, and many others.

It is true that for many years The New York Times was considered one of the top newspapers. And they printed the story about Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers which was important for the public sentiment to turn against the Vietnam War due it being perpetuated as lies by the government. But that all changed between the early 70s and 2001, because whatever "findings" anyone comes up with to solve the terror crimes of 9/11/01, we must consider the source.

The terror crimes of 9/11/01 could not have had anywhere near the level of success that they did in emplacing fear, shock etc. into the citizens without the explicit, direct participation of the media. All stations broadcasted the same fake videos that were prepared in advance by the government.

It would be completely irresponsible to accept as proof of the existence of flight AA11 the report in the New York Times you link to above. That story is 100% able to be fabrication fed to / placed into the media by the government, exactly like the staged videos, and the much more recent killing of osama fraud.

While taking apart that whole transcript would be detailed and take some space [maybe a future post, except to say right away here, even despite the deep shock and pain, and confusion and abundance of emotion immediately following, it still seems that one month and 5 days later in the age of computers and internet is a really long time to await a transcription that probably took less than an hour or two of work to prepare, and it could have taken up even less time than that to come up with a fabricated transcript], everyone needs to understand that even if we got a tape of ATC recordings of Boston Center and Logan Tower for the morning of 9/11/01, that would be data most likely through a FOIA request, so provided by the suspects, and easily altered or fabricated.

As part of the Vigilant Guardian exercises that were taking place that day [and this would really be true on every day of the year any way], the US government and military have the authority to enter at will into the ATC transmissions, they easily could have and probably did in fact actually record those words if anyone could get the real, true, original recordings of that morning, even then it does not prove that the plane flew.

And since from your own high quality research and others here I learned that there is close to certainty that there were 2 flight 93s and up to 3 flight 175s, and the story of the pilot who claimed he was right behind and next to go after one of those flights is something that needs more examination.

Currently am unaware of any actual witness accounts of the take off of AA11 (sorry, once again, that NY Times link above is not proof, it could have been completely produced, even by the perps on the true ATC recordings that will likely never be known for certain).

Even if they took off, the 2 flights that were not in the BTS database until 2004, this is not some simple error or omission, like AA forgot to send the data for those 2 flights that day, no.

Even if at least 2 different planes took off for all 4 supposed flights, it has been established for certain that AA77 did not crash into the Pentagon [all of Craig Renke and Aldo's extensive in depth work], and that flight 93 did not crash in PA.

Whether or not the "Flight X" mystery plane you describe landing Cleveland Hopkins at 1045AM is one of the 4 supposed aircraft, it is likely an important part of the story.

No parts of AA11 were recovered from WTC or found there. Even if the transcript is 100% true and that plane flew and took off from Logan on 4R, it doesn't mean that aircraft crashed into the WTC at 846AM or at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Diogenes
post Sep 13 2011, 08:00 PM
Post #27





Group: Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5,318



QUOTE (727fan @ Aug 17 2011, 07:56 AM) *
No parts of AA11 were recovered from WTC or found there. Even if the transcript is 100% true and that plane flew and took off from Logan on 4R, it doesn't mean that aircraft crashed into the WTC at 846AM or at all.

exactly. The forensic identification evidence for all these flights is utterly laughable and pathetic...No other major airliner crash or disaster magically evaporates its evidence the way "9/11" did. Or atleast, at no time before has the govt been so secretive about any identified parts of a crashed major airliner.

doesn't flight 175 lack identifiable parts too?

Additionally, we even now know that the major network "live" video coverage of the WTC crashes are crude digital forgeries and duplicates. The 5 major networks and the so-called "independent" filmmakers like the Naudet brothers (these are all govt ops) had videos of laughable artifacts and glitches of pre-fabrication, digital rendering, pre-editing and overlaying, and inconsistencies.

many of the publicized alleged "victims" photos are also nothing but crude forgeries, duplicates with minor alterations, computer-matrix generated faces, and even a black face photo and a white face photo for the same person!

www.septemberclues.info has this info including its forums.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th October 2014 - 08:30 PM