Could This Be Explosive Nanothermite Options

[9/11 Justice Now]

Hello there i found a video which you may all want to see it is a video released as a result of a lawsuit against NIST
it is a video of about one of 65000 abtained by NIST in the first torrent release which is 83.9GB in size and this is just
the tip of the iceberg the video is shot lower down on the wtc south tower as some form of molten material pours and
leaks out of the corner of the south tower as the molten material falls it breaks apart into smaller flakes chunks but
as this video shows it does what i think no one could have ever predicted it explodes as part of it is falling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe7Td_MrRlA...player_embedded

We now know 2 facts about the molten material seen pouring out of the corner of the south tower

1.) We know it is molten but we dont know what it is it could be anything.

2.) It explodes.

Fact number 2 now begs the question is this explosive nanothermite? If it is not explosive nanothermite what is it
and why is it exploding? It looks like professor steven jones could be right after all i would like to see the debunkers
de bunk this one.

The simple fact that it explodes makes an even stronger case for explosive nanothermite does it not? The time is coming
for a new investigation the evidence is mounting, it is time to demand a new investigation, it is time those responsible for
this event where bought to justice.

Once irrefutable proofs of their crimes are bought to light they will no longer be able to deny the charges bought against them
and they will be executed for their crimes and the whole world will finally know who the real terrorists really are no not 19 arabs
in a cave, the evidence is clearer than ever that what we where given is a farce the evidence is becoming clearer that nanothermite
was used i think this video just about closes the debate and seals the deal no more arguing about was there nanothermite or was there
not dont you agree?

Do you agree that this could be it clear evidence of explosive nanothermite? The possibilities are very narrow on this one
what do you think it explosive nanothermite or not? Please tell me what you think it is and why you agree or disagree with me
whatever it is explosive nanothermite or not the simple fact is it is indeed very suspicious wouldnt you agree?

Cheers i look forward to you responses take care friends.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif)

This post has been edited by 9/11 Justice Now: Oct 4 2010, 03:24 AM

[SanderO]

That clip is not conclusive that there was an explosion. It could have been a splash when the liquid glob was blown by wind into the side of the building.

Further, if you are familiar with the nano thermite paper, Jones indicate that the red gray chips ignited when the temps reached 400°C. We could presume that the falling globs of liquid were cooling rather than heating and so it is counter intuitive to what what Jones found.

Further we know very little about how nano thermite behaves, how it would or could have been used. We dont' even have a reliable understanding of how much there was. The findings were based on 4 samples which were taken at 300', 700' 750' and over a 100' from the site. We don't even know which buildings the red gray chips came from as the samples were all collected after the collapse of all three towers.

The red gray chips are troubling but they raise more questions then they answer and Harrit told me last month that he has no idea of how nano thermite could be used to destroy the towers.

One might also want to ask why would one corner in one tower at the 80th floor show this melting. What was special about this corner and did it have anything to do with the destruction (controlled demolition) of WTC 2 which seemed to collapse by tilting to the SE?