Pilots For Truth Continues To Grow - New Core Members Added

rob balsamo
post Nov 17 2010, 10:55 AM
Post #1

Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1

In just 4 short years, Pilots For 9/11 Truth has grown to over 300 Verified Pilots and Aviation Professionals, almost 3000 forum members, even more petition signors, and continues to grow.

Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core to browse the long and growing list of Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core Members.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth have made it their mission to determine the truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 since it has become the day which has changed the world for us all with an overwhelming and growing number of questions unresolved.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth have analyzed the events which took place at the WTC, The Pentagon, and in Shankville, PA based on data provided by government agencies. Numerous presentations, technical papers and articles have been produced with more in the making including analysis of the Air Response on 9/11. Many radio, TV and Speaking engagements throughout the world have been accomplished, with more to come. There is a growing mountain of evidence which conflicts with the Government version of events.

Over the years, Pilots For 9/11 Truth have contacted numerous Government Agencies attempting to get answers for the clear conflicts within their official narrative. They refuse to comment. Hundreds of Media representatives, Aviation Associations and members of Congress have also been contacted and continue to be informed of the evidence. Affidavits have been submitted in support of the victims, litigation remains ongoing.

As we approach the Tenth year since the year of the attacks, Pilots For 9/11 Truth continue working, attempting to get answers for the growing mountain of conflicts within the official narrative, while pushing for a new investigation. More TV/Radio interviews and speaking engagements to inform the public are also anticipated. Some have already been completed and will be airing soon.

During your research, you may also notice a loud minority attempting to marginalize and suppress the analysis done and evidence uncovered by Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Some claim the work of Pilots For 9/11 Truth is just flat out wrong, yet those who make such claims, have no experience in aviation and have proven to be inaccurate and/or intentionally deceptive in their claims. "Nothing to see here folks, move along" is their underlying agenda. Uncovering such fatal conflicts to the official narrative of the events of 9/11 as Pilots For 9/11 Truth have done, one can expect to see such tactics. "You don't get flak unless you're over the target" is a statement to keep in mind when reading such attacks on Pilots For 9/11 Truth. If you come across such divisive rhetoric, please email pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org or join the Pilots For 9/11 Truth forum with any questions you may have.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth needs your help in our mission to get answers, and eventually, the Truth.

What you can do:

First and foremost - Refuse the Naked Body Scanners at Airports. These scanners are a slippery slope which will eventually lead to having the same type intrusive and illegal search when you just want to buy a loaf of bread or a gallon of milk at your local Supermarket, or enter any public establishment.

Read the US Constitution - We all could use a little refresher now and then. Sit down one day with your favorite beverage and just take an hour or so reading it. You'll be surprised how many times you say to yourself, "I didn't know our Government wasn't allowed to do 'that', then why is 'this' happening?"

Click here - http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

Call/Write your Congress Representatives and Senators, notify them of the growing list of Pilots and Aviation Professionals, the growing list of Architects and Engineers, Military Officers, Firefighters, Lawyers, Medical Professionals, Family Members and Victims, and Citizen Investigators who not only question the official narrative, but have uncovered several fatal conflicts within the theory dictated to the public through the official narrative.

You can find your local representative here:

Demand a new investigation. Demand justice for the victims, the First Responders, The US Constitution, our Freedoms!

Call into radio shows, TV shows, write producers, notify them of the same. Spread the word! Help others to inform themselves of the evidence. Give them the tools, give them DVD's, direct them to the analysis.

If you are an aviation professional, pilot, etc - tell your co-workers, direct them to PilotsFor911Truth.org. Give them copies of the presentations, the technical papers, the articles, the interviews.

If you are a passenger, do the same when you go to the airport, after you refuse the Naked Body Scanner. Give DVD's to the pilots. Ask them questions based on the work done by Pilots For 9/11 Truth. eg. "Do you think a 767 can fly at 510 knots near sea level? Do you think you can fly this plane at 150 knots over it's max operating and remain in control?" When they laugh, inform them that is what their government wants them to believe.

We want to sincerely thank you all for your support. We would not be here without you. Thank you!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Nov 18 2010, 01:44 AM
Post #2

Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,111
Joined: 7-November 07
From: Prague or France
Member No.: 2,452

Hi Rob,

I think in the legal sense the TSA is a federal agency instituted by public incorporation and therefore IS directly or indirectly a subject of the enumeration by the US Constitution.
A basic principle of the legal constitution in US in general as I see it from a distance is that the federal power has no more rights than the rights they are enumerated in the bill called Constitution of the United States. This is confirmed by the 9th Amendment of The US Constitution in plain English.
Moreover the Right of the Liberty is mentioned by The Declaration of Independence, which as I see it is the base of the bases of the legal constitution of the United States as a legal power in general, and the Right of Liberty is there again in plain English provided with the important attribute of "unalienable". The term unalienable in legal sense means this Right of Liberty cannot be waived in any case and any case of an attempt to do so is in legal sense completely void from the very beginning. Unalienable Right in other words means you're not provided by a Right to waive it.
The argument of TSA is I think not valid in the legal sense, because the security of the person against the abuse thereof is in other words immanently only the other definition of the Liberty in general sense. Where the security against the unreasonable or even abusive searches is one of the Rights particularly enumerated in the bill called US Costitution amendments called Bill of Rights is reserved to the people clearly describing the condition of reasonability: a warrant issued uder probable cause supported by Oath or affirmation (which both are subjected to the penalties if broken or false either by US Constitution itself or the penal code).
Moreover if then the particular legal definition provided by the US penal code additionaly defines some particular behaviour violating this Right of Liberty in general sense as a criminal offence this has in legal sense nothing to do with waiving or not any constitutional right anyway, because it is already also a subject of particular interdiction derived from the original powers enumerated, using a bill directly enforceable in this case the 18 USC - enforceable in US, all its dominias, prisons and due to some precedents in case of sec. 2244, what a surprise, even in indian territories.
Even you would for instant example waive your right to not be stripsearched, even you do it in written, it would not prevent it to be then a criminal offence to stripsearch you in the public, because the legal definition elsewhere in the federal penal code defines exposing genitals etc. to the public being a criminal offence anyway in general.
To make it even more paradoxical in fact the subduing to the body-scanner would be a criminal offence in itself of you if you do voluntarily, because you then potentially expose your intimate parts to more persons than the "public" is in fact defined in the USC. But it isn't your criminal offence in fact, because the fact your Right to Liberty is violated by coercion fully transfers the resposibility for the crime to the persons they directly or indirectly coerced you to do so and thereby violated your inalienable Right of the Liberty, because in legal sense it is then them and no one else who did such an exposure by will, not you.
Of course any fine by TSA for not exposing your genitals etc. either to body-scanner procedures or to the "pat-down" molestation would be not enforceable in any US court in general and I really seriously doubt TSA would ever even try it, because their legal department (maybe I overestimate their intelect) must be aware of the very probable massive repercussions of trying to do so. Such a threat of the fine of 10K on the other hand paradoxicly nevertheless clearly can be considered as an act of "domestic terrorism" under sec. 802 of The Patriot Act, because it is clearly act "appearing to be intended to coerce civilian population" in itself, and because the coercion is defined as an unlawful enforcement, which the enforcement to expose your intimous parts either to body-scan or touch of the TSA officers without express permision clearly is even if we forget about Constitution - because the effectual law for this case is the penal code alone anyway.
I think an institution of the searches as you write about (in supermarket and like) is possible but never would be legal, because there never will be the legal constitution of the United States abolished - for simple reason - no state survives its Constitution, because the state IS its constitution, everything else is a life in its territory. And it is valid twice for states which are based on enumeration of unalienable rights. The people not only cannot waive them, they are in the case of the US at the same time burden by the duty - in the very legal sense! - because enumerated in The Declaration of Independence - to throw off any government which evinces to alienate them. I think, I hope I'm not too optimist, to finally preclude it would be in the case of Americans and their practical and fervent exercise of the other Rights mentioned in the US Constitution practically not much a problem at all. Although I think it would be indeed even easier if they would finally comprehend the notion of Problem-Reaction-Solution scam you mention.

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Nov 18 2010, 02:33 AM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th November 2018 - 09:58 AM