Cold Fusion - Practical, Demonstrable, well maybe |
Cold Fusion - Practical, Demonstrable, well maybe |
 Jan 23 2011, 07:50 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Extreme Forum Pilot Posts: 1,690 Joined: 13-December 06 From: maryland Member No.: 315  |
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jan 23 2011, 03:17 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Extreme Forum Pilot Posts: 1,690 Joined: 13-December 06 From: maryland Member No.: 315 |
there are a lot of outfits/groups/nations working on CF. LENR(low energy nuclear reaction) makes sense to me because quantum mechanics allows it. i've been following this since fleischman and pons announced it.
even sent jones a query which he never responded to. as far as the isotope changes, that is to be expected imho. not to knock the italians, but i thought the japanese or chinese were going to beat everybody to the commercial market. i also assumed that palladium would play an integral part. wrong on both counts apparently. as far as long term goes, i would rather see totally de-centralized power generation. a cf reactor in everybody's house! edit: i think she meant 'bumblebee'. This post has been edited by GroundPounder: Jan 23 2011, 03:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2011, 04:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
QUOTE (GroundPounder @ Jan 23 2011, 07:17 AM)  there are a lot of outfits/groups/nations working on CF. LENR(low energy nuclear reaction) makes sense to me because quantum mechanics allows it. i've been following this since fleischman and pons announced it. even sent jones a query which he never responded to. as far as the isotope changes, that is to be expected imho. not to knock the italians, but i thought the japanese or chinese were going to beat everybody to the commercial market. i also assumed that palladium would play an integral part. wrong on both counts apparently. as far as long term goes, i would rather see totally de-centralized power generation. a cf reactor in everybody's house! edit: i think she meant 'bumblebee'. first, I thought Andrea Rossi is a man. I'm not completely skeptical about CF, but what the Focardi/Rossi claim must be first supported by data, especially by the data of post run analysis of the "powder" - if they claim Cu "superior to 30%" "integrally bound to the amount of energy produced" they must substantiate it with thorough analysis preferably published in the peer reviewed real journal. Without it this looks to me as steorn orbo and other like fraudulent stuff. |
|
|
|
GroundPounder Cold Fusion - Practical, Demonstrable Jan 23 2011, 07:50 AM
tumetuestumefaisdubien I've seen this earlier but I've quite hesi... Jan 23 2011, 02:08 PM GroundPounder a couple of links that support CF:
http://www.sci... Jan 23 2011, 04:00 PM GroundPounder QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ Jan 21 2011, ... Jan 23 2011, 04:24 PM tumetuestumefaisdubien I would add, that a real science is about experime... Jan 23 2011, 05:22 PM tumetuestumefaisdubien I was looking into the issue more deeply - because... Jan 24 2011, 08:19 PM GroundPounder is it possible that it's a hoax? sure.
i... Jan 25 2011, 07:50 AM tumetuestumefaisdubien I would take it upside down. Is it possible this i... Jan 25 2011, 10:26 PM GroundPounder thanks for the link. it does look like they have b... Jan 26 2011, 07:53 AM
lunk Perpetual? no beginning and no end
Motion? Does a... Jan 26 2011, 10:46 AM
 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 09:01 PM |
