IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
9/11: Intercepted - New Release, PilotsFor911truth.org

Rating 5 V
 
KILL YOUR TV!
post Feb 24 2011, 05:00 AM
Post #41


serving suggestion


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 254
Joined: 20-October 06
Member No.: 113



What a fantastic presentation. A huge congratulations to Rob and team.

9//11 Intercepted makes a clear and punchy point: that flight data provided by government agencies just doesn't support the official 9/11 narrative.

I found the film brought a great insight into how air defence and air traffic control operates, and how they were set up to fail on the day.
Not to mention the ridiculous coincidences, strange incongruencies and pure imposibilities that have simply not been brought to our attention - until now..

The film takes thorough research and expert analysis and breaks it down for the layman - highly recommended for everyone from hardcore researchers to everyday folk looking for simple answers.

A invaluable addition to the case against the OCT.


KYTV

@Rob - the new voice-over is fantastic! I do hope you intend to go back and redub the previous presentations too. Not that I have anything against your voice smile.gif

This post has been edited by KILL YOUR TV!: Feb 24 2011, 05:04 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 24 2011, 05:30 AM
Post #42



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Good to see you KYTV!

(for those who dont know, KYTV is the person responsible for our awesome logo)

Thanks for the compliments (and to all).

Yes, Chris is fantastic. He does voice-overs for ESPN, CNN, TruTV, TNT, TBS... etc etc. He's been on TV for over 22 years. Great guy. He's been following our work (and the work of others), for years. He knows all about the deceptions and corruption taking place in our govt.

I agree, his voice is much better than mine. (although i do get a lot of compliments for my "radio voice" when speaking with ATC)... smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Feb 24 2011, 09:30 AM
Post #43



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,982
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



i just ordered 2 copies!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 24 2011, 05:30 PM
Post #44



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (lunk @ Feb 24 2011, 08:30 AM) *
i just ordered 2 copies!



and your package is on its way.... smile.gif

Thanks for your support lunk!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GroundPounder
post Feb 26 2011, 04:18 PM
Post #45





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 13-December 06
From: maryland
Member No.: 315



a polished professional work indeed! great job rob! handsdown.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Mar 4 2011, 02:57 PM
Post #46


Woody Box


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 266
Joined: 28-August 06
Member No.: 20



Excellent job, Rob!

Somehow I only now managed to watch the piece - therefore my late reaction.

I especially like the calm, smooth style of the presentation. The speaker is brilliant.

Thanks for crediting me. The United ACARS messages definitely deserve more attention, IMO.

The audio tapes of Boston Center (with UA 175) were completely new to me. Very interesting.

Great job, again, and move on.

This post has been edited by woody: Mar 4 2011, 03:00 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Mar 16 2011, 09:28 AM
Post #47



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Thanks woody... glad you liked it.

Yes, i agree, the ACARS information needed much more exposure. Thanks for helping out with that segment!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Mar 22 2011, 08:36 AM
Post #48



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,982
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



Just got the videos in the mail!

...Just watched it.

excellence!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post May 14 2011, 09:29 PM
Post #49



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,982
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



QUOTE
9/11: Intercepted


Perfect choice for the name!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post May 15 2011, 12:12 AM
Post #50



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (lunk @ May 14 2011, 09:29 PM) *
Perfect choice for the name!


Yes... i agree... smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
albertchampion
post May 15 2011, 02:14 AM
Post #51





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,843
Joined: 1-March 07
Member No.: 710



have i earned a copy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post May 15 2011, 02:51 AM
Post #52



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (albertchampion @ May 15 2011, 02:14 AM) *
have i earned a copy?



I sent you a contributors copy before i even made the announcement it was available on the site. You didnt get it?

I'll send another.... and of course you have earned a copy...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bambooboy
post Jun 17 2011, 12:58 AM
Post #53





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 43
Joined: 28-February 10
Member No.: 4,935



definitively UAL ACARS (Remote Ground Stations+time) are the key.
absolutely.

PS:
hi Woody
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Jun 18 2011, 03:00 PM
Post #54


Woody Box


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 266
Joined: 28-August 06
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (bambooboy @ Jun 17 2011, 04:58 AM) *
definitively UAL ACARS (Remote Ground Stations+time) are the key.
absolutely.

PS:
hi Woody


Hi Bambooboy.

ACARS for president!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bill
post Sep 12 2011, 09:00 AM
Post #55





Group: Guest
Posts: 1,922
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 147



I had not seen this vid before

interesting in the first part of the vid about the gaps in RADAR coverage and the ease of swapping aircraft


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
23investigator
post Sep 12 2011, 12:05 PM
Post #56





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 373
Joined: 28-November 10
From: Australia
Member No.: 5,467



QUOTE (bill @ Sep 12 2011, 10:30 PM) *
I had not seen this vid before

interesting in the first part of the vid about the gaps in RADAR coverage and the ease of swapping aircraft


Dear Bill

It most certainly is.
If you don't mind this seems a very good opportunity to introduce these considerations.

With the amount of activity going on that particular morning with 'radar screens being filled with aircraft' it is not beyond the realms of possibility that two aircraft --that ultimately-- hit the two towers could have discretely taken off from some airport/s and loitered around for a short time to substitute the two --"passenger aircraft" that have been considered to have hit the towers, which very conveniently turned off 'transponders' at even more convenient locations.

The substitute aircraft could have come from some considerable distance away, or even very close to the flight path of the two "passenger aircraft" probably loitering up at a considerable altitude.

In the case of 'flight 11' it took a very convenient detour to place itself over the area of radar --blockout-- to then turn left to take it very close to a certain airfield, which could well accomodate an aircraft of its size.
Allowing the -substitute aircraft to continue on to the North Tower.

Interesting thing that, that particular airfield had considerable--upgrading-- in the year following 9/11.

Flight 175 had a convenient cross over with Flight 11 it seems from what data has been presented.

It could possibly be that the substitute for Flight 11 was not on its own at this time, with the cross over allowing for a further substitution, Flight 175 continuing on with its transponder off, the substitute aircraft,
presenting itself as the 'radar target' to continue on its way towards Tower Two.
There has been considerable witness account to the consideration that the aircraft that was seen to be considered to have hit the South Tower was a smaller aircraft than a Boeing 767.

Interesting enough on the Youtube where the video you have placed is, there is a video showing an "aircraft" flying towards and hitting the South Tower.
When that footage is considered it would be a better description to say that something pretending to be a Boeing 767 was moving a cross the screen like a 'caterpillar' with all sorts of strange artefact around it, at one point stretching out in length considerably.

If when the 'caterpillar' is carefully watched when it comes up to the south wall of the South Tower it appears to enter for quite a distance before an eruption of black smoke appears, ''which could well have been something to do with the real aircraft that hit the South Tower, being smaller than the 'caterpillar' and back some distance from its nose, would have been likely to have happened.

Then even more foreground interference comes in to play with a large leaf vigorously waving around in front of the camera, blocking clear view of something that came out of the north east corner of the South Tower, which could well have been part/s of the true aircraft that hit the South Tower.

Robert

ps/ In the mean time the true flight 175 could have been flying on south confusing the issue for people to consider it as Flight 11, to then land somewhere, or perhaps continue on till it ran out of fuel, with perhaps more passengers on it than what every body thought.
There was another airfield in the general proximity of the first one mentioned that came into some serious upgrade too, immediately after 9/11.
That particular field seemed to have connection with --helicopters--, as well as fixed wing capability of considerable size.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BarryWilliamsmb
post Sep 12 2011, 12:45 PM
Post #57





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 243
Joined: 30-September 07
From: Regina, Sask, Canada
Member No.: 2,278



Yes Robert, the video you mention is very interesting, to say the least.

I'm no camera or video expert but when I see the "aircraft" fly in front of the crane's cables and yet behind the crane - that seems mighty fishy to me.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SeniorTrend
post Sep 19 2011, 02:55 PM
Post #58





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 21
Joined: 15-September 11
Member No.: 6,275



QUOTE (wilddaddy @ Feb 15 2011, 08:30 AM) *
Just ordered it! handsdown.gif


I ordered all 5 DVD's on the 16th, USPS shows it out for delivery today - I would call that pretty darned good service! (Thanks Rob!)
I downloaded most of the files while waiting for the DVD's and have been analyzing the data presented. The amazing thing is that the perps have created such an absurd scenario with all of the events - They either think Americans are gullible, just plain ignorant, mesmerized, or just don't care. The reality is I think that they (the perps) just don't really care - in their mind they are above the law. The sad truth seems to be that the majority of the American people willingly took the "blue pill" - We just have to stick to our knitting, and dissect the data element by element as is reflected in Pilots for 911 Truth, and hope that, like in the Matrix, we can reach critical mass. At 10 years and counting...... we seem to be well away from that criticality.

This post has been edited by SeniorTrend: Sep 19 2011, 02:57 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Sep 19 2011, 03:57 PM
Post #59



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE (SeniorTrend)
The reality is I think that they (the perps) just don't really care - in their mind they are above the law.


Ditto.

Edit: In the Drysden crash video can anyone explain what appears to be an electrical flash above the left engine at the 7 - 8 second mark? Followed by a few sporactic lights. Video issue or..?

http://youtu.be/f4BOL_LFpjY

This post has been edited by onesliceshort: Sep 19 2011, 04:19 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paranoia
post Sep 19 2011, 08:04 PM
Post #60


dig deeper
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 1,015
Joined: 16-October 06
From: arlington va
Member No.: 96



oss - that (and the other "flashes") look to me like hair/fiber stuck on old film (the kind you had to watch on a projector), not an electrical arc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th August 2014 - 12:51 AM