IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Vice Magazine Predicted 9/11 Years Before It Happened, But that's not all the writer also says imagine if the twins colla

Paul
post Feb 21 2011, 06:44 AM
Post #1





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Australia
Member No.: 3,978



Hi there folks once again strange pictures have emerged closely depicting 9/11 even before it happened this time the article comes
from Vice Magazine and article that was printed in 1994 apparently which is a cartoon depiction of beavis and buuthead circling the twin
towers in airplanes dressed as arabs with white turbines wrapped around there heads and also beavis is depicted with butthead butt beavis
is holding a a bomb in his hand with a light fuse but the strangest thing of all is this is played out and talked about in writing done in an interview
style with someone asking a question then vice answering it goes on and on about the al quada terrorist network with mentions about the 1993 bombing bin laden and how he was cut off rejected by his parents and how the CIA literally funded these guys provided money to the Muhajadeen to keep the cold war going and some other crap about al quaeda and Bin Laden, but the most interesting part of all is near the beggining and how the author actually goes on to say "Can you imagine the carnage? Can you even begin to start to go down the trail of comprehending what it would be like if the Twin Towers where to collapse?" So here we have it seven years before the fact someone actaully imagines exactly what did happen seven years later the collapse of both twin towers, how could anyone possible imagine exactly what would happen to the twin towers before it did this i have to say is impossible unless whoever wrote the article somehow knew exactly what was going to happen most probably someone opened their big mouth for some reason and told the person who wrote this article what the government was going to do this my friend i have to say provides irrefutable evidence that the events where planned and the collapse of the twin towers was planned as well as we have all known it all along it was all planned by people within our own governemnt possible with the help of outside asssistance, im sorry to say this but there is not a chance in hell someone could just have imagined up the idea that the twin towers would collapse just by coincidence, i think it needs to be established who was working at vice who wrote the article so we can chace the down and hound them with questions and how they came about thinking up the idea that both towers would collapse, it's funny how everyone ignores the obvious evidence of direct foreknowledge o the events that sits right infront of there very eyes but seem to blab on and focus on other parts of the article. Read the original artcile as it was posted over here on the ATS forum as i found it.

No not suspicious at all is it? Not even one tiny little bit?

http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread664358/pg1

Link to the original Vice Artcle:

http://scot1and.org/~allan/beavis_and_butthead.jpg

It truly is something isnt it and how much of this stuff depicting the attacks actually existed before hand
like the simpsons 9/11 episdoe the illuminati playing cards and so on.

It seems as though someone needs to investigate this matter further because we seem to have direct forehand knowledge
of the attacks depicting what was actaully going to happen and what actually did an unfortunatly happened which killed all those
innocent people and firefighters in the towers who lives are lost and will never ever be forgotton we must bring justice to them all
and bring this menacing nightmare of a puzzle we have to a final end so we can all move on with our lives and everyone can have
peace of mind and closure at long last.

Cheers Paul S

whistle.gif whistle.gif whistle.gif

This post has been edited by Paul: Feb 21 2011, 06:46 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Feb 21 2011, 10:47 AM
Post #2





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,909
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Well we know that some people knew about this before it happened, but it is funny that Beavis & Butthead would know too! laughing1.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paranoia
post Feb 21 2011, 03:31 PM
Post #3


dig deeper
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 1,015
Joined: 16-October 06
From: arlington va
Member No.: 96



paul - ur first link at www.atsadgrab.com isnt working (even the site itself seems to be defunct),
but for further reading here is the VICE magazine article:

http://www.viceland.com/int/v16n10/htdocs/...l-qaeda-183.php

eta - see also:
http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2011/02/2...were-in-on-911/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Feb 22 2011, 11:49 AM
Post #4





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,194
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



QUOTE (Paul @ Feb 19 2011, 09:44 AM) *
It truly is something isnt it and how much of this stuff depicting the attacks actually existed before hand

Well, Kindaliesallot Economical-with-the-actualite Rice never thought of planes hitting the WTC.

But then maybe she knew the plot and that no planes, as in conventional airliners, were involved at all anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Feb 22 2011, 10:56 PM
Post #5





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Australia
Member No.: 3,978



QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Feb 23 2011, 01:19 AM) *
Well, Kindaliesallot Economical-with-the-actualite Rice never thought of planes hitting the WTC.

But then maybe she knew the plot and that no planes, as in conventional airliners, were involved at all anyway.


Yes but she envisioned the twin towers collapsing how did she know that would happen? Can you explain that?
Do you remember what she said?

"Can you imagine the carnage? Can you even begin to start to go down the trail of comprehending what it would be like if the Twin Towers where to collapse?"

She is guilty as sin as far as im concerned, nobody could have imagined or predicted that the towers would collapse that's impossible.

yes1.gif yes1.gif yes1.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FM258
post Feb 23 2011, 12:32 AM
Post #6





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 286
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 64



QUOTE (Paul @ Feb 22 2011, 09:56 PM) *
Yes but she envisioned the twin towers collapsing how did she know that would happen? Can you explain that?
Do you remember what she said?

"Can you imagine the carnage? Can you even begin to start to go down the trail of comprehending what it would be like if the Twin Towers where to collapse?"

She is guilty as sin as far as im concerned, nobody could have imagined or predicted that the towers would collapse that's impossible.

yes1.gif yes1.gif yes1.gif


I have serious doubts that this was not done after the fact.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tumetuestumefais...
post Feb 23 2011, 01:21 AM
Post #7





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,096
Joined: 7-November 07
From: Prague or France
Member No.: 2,452



QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Feb 22 2011, 04:49 AM) *
Well, Kindaliesallot Economical-with-the-actualite Rice never thought of planes hitting the WTC.

But then maybe she knew the plot and that no planes, as in conventional airliners, were involved at all anyway.

Cuntorlizzard Reuse never thought about anything like planes, she likes grey submarines.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Feb 23 2011, 05:01 AM
Post #8





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Australia
Member No.: 3,978



QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ Feb 23 2011, 02:51 PM) *
Cuntorlizzard Reuse never thought about anything like planes, she likes grey submarines.


Sorry i dont understand what that is supposed to mean can you please explain?

I am stupid sometimes lol

laughing1.gif laughing1.gif dunno.gif dunno.gif

This post has been edited by Paul: Feb 23 2011, 05:02 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Obwon
post Apr 17 2011, 11:05 AM
Post #9





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 560
Joined: 29-November 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,712



Even though this all means very little, it does give the lie to Condoleeza saying "We could never have imagined..." etc..

My off hand guess would be, like many other tragedies, the '93 bombing set off writer imaginations, about what the effect of a twin tower collapse could do. Since the buildings house
so many thousands of people, it would make for a pretty dramatic story, if someone can get it right. For the sake of their earnings, writers are very tempted to try, and so, they'd begin to speculate about what kinds of causes they could use, to make their stories more dramatic.

I do remember a mention, after the 93 bombing, that someone inside the investigation claimed; "If they had put the truck in another location, inside the garage, they could have brought the towers down." I would have to guess that many writers who heard such remarks, would begin thinking about the kind of stories that could be written. In fact, after the '93 bombing, I'd be surprised if no such speculating stories were written. Disaster and horror movies have a large following, and "Nightmare on Elm Street" was still in vogue then. Who could forget Norman Bates?

In fact, I would not be surprised if some CIA reader, didn't pass this to some right wing insider, from where it got passed to the PNAC, who would have then co-opted it. Through their connections with the media, the think tanks could get the story killed, so it's parameters could be kept secret, for them to use in planning their "New Pearl Harbor".

Of course, what I'm writing is purely imaginative, and probably of little use on it face. Except that something may be found to connect it to something. In which case, it might just become useful. Okay, against that possibility, let me go on.

Let's say you're an "insider", fixated on middle east dangers, and with a real need for this New Pearl Harbor. My guess is you discuss this with cohorts, and secretly examine various scenarios.
Let's say your crowd does the '93 thing, and it fails to kick off the intended response. My guess is your crowd begins discussions about why it didn't garner the desired response. You'd probably conclude; Not enough civilian injuries and deaths, which would have made it that much more horrible and fearsome.

So, now you're looking for something that could happen to anyone anywhere. Something that could strike fear in the hearts of the nation. Truck bombs can't do that, because they have to appear at high profile locations. Not many people in the nation, live or work in such high profile "national monument" type locations, so fear doesn't spread as pervasively as desired over
truck bombs.

But then someone notices that planes go everywhere! What if you could fix it so that, every time someone thinks of a plane, they're thinking of an event that could possibly happen to,
or harm them? Hey, we may be onto something, because they could be hit by a hijacked aircraft, even if they weren't the intended target. So, to kick start a national wave of fear, you need a dramatic event, involving planes doing some really horrific damage.

But, you know from Northwoods etc., that such plans usually fail to win necessary approval, because the top people, can't or won't accept (many?) innocent civilian casualties. So the plan, that needs innocent civilian casualties to work as intended -- by setting off a wave of hatred and fear that can then be managed and directed -- must keep the really horrific nature of the plan secret from the top people. Once it's all over, and they see the results of what they approved and how it actually worked out, then saying; "This was not the plan we approved", would hardly serve as an acceptable defense! So they're forced to go along with whatever is offered
as a way out. The "skyjacked planes", fills the bill quite effectively.

So then, that settled, that they'd crash skyjacked jet liners into landmark buildings, causing numerous deaths, they'd need a way to conceal from their superiors, that any real deaths were actually being planned. Thus they'd need diversions. They'd have to show how fictitious passengers would be created and real ones switched out of harms way. How buildings would be evacuated, in plenty of time for imaginary deaths to be substituted. Remembering all the while, that their superiors would be able to track these things in real time, so there's no possibility that they could dispense with the necessary confusions, needed to make it appear that all the real people were out of harms way.

Then first comes the matter of the jet liners! Where does one get these jets from? Buying or leasing jet aircraft is a rather cumbersome affair, involving much paperwork. Worse yet, these jetliners would then have to somehow be re-inserted into national carriers schedules. That means even more work and an increased chance of being discovered. Imagine creating paperwork, that some national air carrier could point to and say; "Hey, that wasn't one of our jets!" No, you can avoid that by not using any of their planes, merely catch them by surprise
same as your superiors, and force them to go along with an official story that exonerates
them, while providing the funds to cover their losses, or rather non-losses, which equals profit. So, you decide not to use actual planes. What real planes you do use are simply re-directed ones, as needed to create the necessary confusion and cover for the real operation.

Okay, that means you don't have to train pilots or program computers and trust to luck to get them to target, without the possibility that something, if only the timing going wrong. With fake planes, indicated by prepared data sets, you have almost complete control of the flights, the illusions of what happens on board, and the timing of the illusions of strikes. Planted explosives will create the damage scenes for display, prepared videos for the media to display, will convince nearly everyone that planes actually did crash, and all goes forward with the blessings of higher ups, who are unaware that they too are outsiders, because of what the real plans will actually do. (Locked roof doors and blocked stairways comes to mind).

Why would merely playing videos on tv, work to convince? Well, at that early stage, who would even want to believe that their own gov't was not just responsible, but lying as well? That's too big a jump to make very quickly, if ever, for most people. To do so at a time when there was such horrific news unfolding and so little detail available, would be lunacy.
Thus you have your New Pearl Harbor in hand, all that's needed from there, is to whip the public into a frenzy of fear and loathing, directed at those in foreign lands and it's off to war we go!
---

Now, the above is just a writers imagination, not fact! I'm sure there will be more imaginative stories written. But, as you can see, high profile events make for very interesting fare, upon which to focus the imagination. The nation is full of nothing, if not fertile imaginations. So, if anything is surprising, it would be if some high profile event did not generate more stories, not less.

Obwon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmead
post Jan 30 2014, 12:59 PM
Post #10





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 26
Joined: 1-May 13
Member No.: 7,380



QUOTE (Paul @ Feb 21 2011, 10:44 AM) *
Hi there folks once again strange pictures have emerged closely depicting 9/11 even before it happened this time the article comes
from Vice Magazine and article that was printed in 1994 apparently which is a cartoon depiction of beavis and buuthead circling the twin
towers in airplanes dressed as arabs with white turbines wrapped around there heads and also beavis is depicted with butthead butt beavis
is holding a a bomb in his hand with a light fuse but the strangest thing of all is this is played out and talked about in writing done in an interview
style with someone asking a question then vice answering it goes on and on about the al quada terrorist network with mentions about the 1993 bombing bin laden and how he was cut off rejected by his parents and how the CIA literally funded these guys provided money to the Muhajadeen to keep the cold war going and some other crap about al quaeda and Bin Laden, but the most interesting part of all is near the beggining and how the author actually goes on to say "Can you imagine the carnage? Can you even begin to start to go down the trail of comprehending what it would be like if the Twin Towers where to collapse?" So here we have it seven years before the fact someone actaully imagines exactly what did happen seven years later the collapse of both twin towers, how could anyone possible imagine exactly what would happen to the twin towers before it did this i have to say is impossible unless whoever wrote the article somehow knew exactly what was going to happen most probably someone opened their big mouth for some reason and told the person who wrote this article what the government was going to do this my friend i have to say provides irrefutable evidence that the events where planned and the collapse of the twin towers was planned as well as we have all known it all along it was all planned by people within our own governemnt possible with the help of outside asssistance, im sorry to say this but there is not a chance in hell someone could just have imagined up the idea that the twin towers would collapse just by coincidence, i think it needs to be established who was working at vice who wrote the article so we can chace the down and hound them with questions and how they came about thinking up the idea that both towers would collapse, it's funny how everyone ignores the obvious evidence of direct foreknowledge o the events that sits right infront of there very eyes but seem to blab on and focus on other parts of the article. Read the original artcile as it was posted over here on the ATS forum as i found it.

No not suspicious at all is it? Not even one tiny little bit?

http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread664358/pg1

Link to the original Vice Artcle:

http://scot1and.org/~allan/beavis_and_butthead.jpg

It truly is something isnt it and how much of this stuff depicting the attacks actually existed before hand
like the simpsons 9/11 episdoe the illuminati playing cards and so on.

It seems as though someone needs to investigate this matter further because we seem to have direct forehand knowledge
of the attacks depicting what was actaully going to happen and what actually did an unfortunatly happened which killed all those
innocent people and firefighters in the towers who lives are lost and will never ever be forgotton we must bring justice to them all
and bring this menacing nightmare of a puzzle we have to a final end so we can all move on with our lives and everyone can have
peace of mind and closure at long last.

Cheers Paul S

whistle.gif whistle.gif whistle.gif



Without suggestion of conspiracy this aptly proves stupidity, but on whose part? Why, the US intelligence agencies-if that is not an oxymoron- So someone else has thought of the potential, has known they are "interested in aviation" Now if someone who has no intelligence connections (where does the "rumour" come from? Presumably someone in intelligence circles but presume the absence of any conspiracy angle, the mention of aviation implied -they could consider using a plane as a missile. There is no other way to look at it is there. So what can we say? We can say that Vice, along with other people have considered this option, and said-hey, could be. CIA etc? Nope not a damn clue, they only get employed to know this stuff, if only they were paid to guess randomly they may have known in advance and been prepared to beef up security.
Bush, Fleischer,Tenet, Rice,Mueller all spoke of how inconceivable, how a failure of imagination allowed the attacks. Shame really that imagination only applies outside of the agencies and leaders who are to protect and serve.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st August 2014 - 05:49 AM