"the New J. Farmer Thread" - Email From Mark Gaffney, merged |

![]() ![]() |
Jun 27 2011, 01:19 AM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 306 Joined: 28-August 07 Member No.: 1,875 |
By the way, Gaffney did read the above replies. Not surprisingly, he once again doesn't wish to face the facts. Thanks for the confirming what I suspected. :-) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif) |
|
|
|
Jun 27 2011, 01:19 AM
Post
#42
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 306 Joined: 28-August 07 Member No.: 1,875 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2011, 12:55 PM
Post
#43
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
I can't blame him for not wanting to engage debate with a real expert, it's clear he hears only what he wants to hear. Unfortunately for Gaffney, even those he sources admit they do not have the expertise to evaluate the information. "Some people have queried my credentials for investigating Flight Data Recorder (FDR commonly called "black box") data and any relevant affiliations I may have. Is it any surprise that Legge/Stutt cannot get one pilot, aviation professional, FDR expert or Aircraft Accident Investigator to sign their name to their "paper"? Meanwhile, our Core member list grows with just that.... decades upon decades of expertise in aviation... http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core (I also have many more to add, havent had a chance to update it in awhile) Anyone who blindly supports Stutt's analysis should think twice about putting their name on such an endorsement before thoroughly reviewing, and most importantly understanding, the rebuttals to such garbage. Imagine Stutt being called to the stand as an Expert Witness and Stutt replying to Voir dire with the same statement he made above. He would be laughed out of the courtroom. |
|
|
|
Jun 29 2011, 03:06 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 306 Joined: 28-August 07 Member No.: 1,875 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 06:10 AM |