Wtc 7 Leaning Against Verizon Building, cut column with molten slag Options

[Paul]

Hi found this photo of the wall columns of wtc 7 leaning against the verizon building where it landed as wtc 7 fell at freefall speed and leaned
back just hitting the verizon building causing some structural damage to the other building as it fell now look at the cut column with the molten
metal iron slag covering part of the top of the building as it fell, i dont know whether this is demolition cut by as thermite demolition charge because
of the molten metal that was produced when it was cut ot whether it is part of a clean up cut, what kind of torch used for cutting steel would produce
so much heat that it would leave messy iron slag dripping down the top of the column where it was cut if it was done by a clean up crew?
The funny thing i dont understand about all of this is if you look at the column which have been cut by clean up crews at ground zero and even
the columns that where cut up after they where removed is that none of them except for one of them a core columsn at ground zero appear to have
and molten metal slag where they where cut during the clean up process, so what kind of torch would leave such a messy cut? And would they use such a torch to make this kind of cut? I am interested to hear what you all have to say about this piece.

(IMG:http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/3769/37debrisofwtc7againstve.jpg)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

http://img710.imageshack.us/i/37debrisofwtc7againstve.jpg/

Cheers Paul S

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif)

[SanderO]

I don't know about your precise language. What is your "attachment" to the term - controlled demolition-? If explosives or devices were planted with the intent to destroy the buildings the term planned destruction or engineered destruction is more appropriate. A controlled demolition is actually a very specific process and result and the twin towers show none of the characteristics of a controlled demolition... expect that the final result is a destroyed structure.

The official account is hardly credible and the coverup seems to be a fig leaf over a series of deceptions.

We don't know who was protected by the cover up, how it was done and even what actually was done. We still only know we've been "officially" deceived. Everything else is speculation.