IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757, PilotsFor911Truth.org

Rating 5 V
 
rob balsamo
post Mar 3 2011, 08:51 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,716
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757


03/03/11 - (PilotsFor911Truth.org) When Pilots For 9/11 Truth was founded in the late summer of 2006, the objective was to find evidence supporting what we have been told by the 9/11 Commission as many theories were rumored that elements within the US Government might have had something to do with 9/11. Co-Founder Rob Balsamo explains how he was puzzled and motivated to pursue further research into the events of 9/11 in his citation at PatriotsQuestion911.com, which lead to the formation of Pilots For 9/11 Truth. More than four years of solid research through Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests, numerous interviews and expert analysis has revealed no hard evidence supporting or linking to -- and in many instances factually conflicting with -- conclusions made by the 9/11 Commission. Now there is overwhelming evidence which suggests the data that is being provided to the public through the FOIA, is not from an aircraft which has been operated by American Airlines.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth analysis of data being provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has revealed the data does not support an impact with the Pentagon, exceeds the capabilities of a standard 757/767 by a wide margin, while demonstrating control issues for an "inexperienced pilot" (See 9/11: Attack On The Pentagon, 9/11: World Trade Center Attack, and Flight Of American 77). The data itself does not support what we have been told by the 9/11 Commission. When contacted, the NTSB and the FBI refused to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth went on to research if there was any evidence linking the data to N644AA (the aircraft described as "Flight 77"), once again, there is no evidence to support the government version of events(1). Research was also performed to determine if there was any evidence whatsoever linking the limited number of parts found at the Pentagon, to N644AA(2). In an unprecedented turn of events, the parts were never verified by any government agency for any of the four aircraft reported to have been used on 9/11. In all instances, there hasn't been any evidence provided by government agencies to support what we have been told by the 9/11 Commission. Further analysis reveals evidence demonstrating the data provided was not generated by an American Airlines airplane in the case of the attack on the Pentagon.

DATA FRAME LAYOUT

Pilots For 9/11 Truth have been provided several files through the FOIA. One file in particular, a raw Flight Data Recorder file which is described as a direct download from the FDR, contains binary code which needs to be decoded for a proper readout in a spreadsheet such as Excel. In order to decode such data, a Data Frame Layout is required. Derived from a generic Boeing Data Frame Layout, American Airlines provided it's own custom made Data Frame Layout which was designed for decoding data from aircraft within the American Airlines fleet, based on airline needs exclusive to American Airlines (AAL). The custom made AAL Data Frame Layout was unable to decode the data in full, and in some instances, neither the AAL Data Frame Layoyut nor the generic Boeing Data Frame Layout were able to be utilized in decoding the data(3). Why would American Airlines design their own custom Data Frame Layout if it cannot decode data from their aircraft? Or perhaps the data being provided is not from an American Airlines jet?

FLIGHT DECK DOOR

Pilots For 9/11 Truth also found, according to the data, there is no evidence suggesting a "Hijack" had occurred. A Flight Deck Door parameter shows the door closed for the entire flight. No evidence has been provided thus far which shows the Flight Deck Door open in order to facilitate a "Hijack".(4)

LATITUDE/LONGITUDE

Further evidence that the data is not from an American Airlines jet nor American Airlines Flight 77, comes in the form of Latitude and Longitude (Lat/Long) coordinates in the data itself. When plotted, the Lat/Long coordinates are more than 3,000 feet in error at time of departure from Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD). According to American Airlines 757/767 Operating Manual, along with several American Airlines 757/767 Captains, the navigational instruments (known as an IRS or Inertial Reference System), is aligned at the gate, prior to all flights(5). If such an error is observed in an American Airlines airplane, the aircraft is grounded until fixed. It would never leave the gate. If such an error was encountered during taxi to the runway, the Captain would have had to return to the gate until it was fixed.(6)

DEPARTURE GATE AND FULL ALIGNMENT

According to official reports and audio provided by government agencies, American Airlines Flight 77 departed from Gate D26 at IAD(7). However, when the Lat/Long data is adjusted for the 3,000+ foot offset, the data shows a departure from a gate other than D26(8). American Airlines requires a full alignment (as opposed to a "fast alignment") prior to every flight with the pilots physically inputting the Lat/Long coordinates of the gate, provided by navigational charts, into their navigational system. The aircraft should have never left the gate with such a large error within it's navigational system. Although some aircraft have the ability to update it's position in flight, an "update" is very different from an alignment. Any "updates" in flight will not be accurate if the initial alignment was not achieved at the gate. It is interesting to note that Military Aircraft are capable of in flight alignment of an Inertial Navigation System.

AUTO-ALIGNMENT AND GPS

Military aircraft were equipped with GPS (Global Positioning Systems) long before GPS was offered for Commercial use. When equipped, they can auto-align the Inertial Reference System. N644AA (American Airlines Flight 77) was not equipped with a GPS. However, when one looks through the data, it shows a GPS as "OPERational"(12) and an airborne auto-alignment. How can a GPS be "OPER" if the data is reported to come from an aircraft which doesn't have a GPS? The data shows that the Lat/Long plots auto-aligned with Radar plots in flight after departure(9). American Airlines aircraft do not have the capability of in flight alignment nor would such an aircraft depart with such a large error and an IRS as it's primary source for navigation. It is impossible for an IRS equipped American Airlines jet to give accurate position information if the system was not aligned at the gate. The aircraft needs to be stationary for proper alignment or else the navigational device will have large errors and could perhaps be fatal(10). According to American Airlines 757/767 Captain Ralph Kolstad who has actual flight time in N644AA, if the Inertial Reference System (IRS) is lost in flight (or shows large errors), an emergency has to be declared. The aircraft is required to sit stationary for more than 10 minutes in order obtain a full alignment of the Inertial Reference System prior to every flight, according to and as required by American Airlines 757/767 Operating Manual(11). How can an auto-align occur airborne if American Airlines aircraft do not have this capability nor a GPS? This is more evidence demonstrating the data did not come from an American Airlines jet.

CONCLUSION

The data does not support an impact with the Pentagon, does not support a departure from the gate claimed by official reports, if the data was in fact generated by an actual aircraft, it was generated by one which is more advanced than N644AA capability in both avionics (instruments) and performance. Furthermore, the data is not able to be decoded in full by a custom data frame layout made by American Airlines exclusively for their aircraft.

The evidence is overwhelming. The data did not come from an American Airlines Jet. Pilots For 9/11 Truth are asked regularly, "If Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, then where did it go?" That is a GREAT question! Pilots For 9/11 Truth recommend demanding answers in order to obtain the data from the aircraft which is claimed to have departed gate D26 at Washington Dulles on the morning of September 11, 2001 and most importantly corresponds through Lat/Long plots to a departure from Gate D26. From there, it can be tracked to where it went! Unfortunately, subpoena power will perhaps be needed to get such information and data, as FOIA requests have been exhausted and the government agencies who have responded to such requests refuse further comment. "We have fulfilled our request. You get what you get, the data we gave you doesn't support our findings? No comment! " has proven to be the case. Lawsuits have been filed by victims of 9/11, particularly one by April Gallop, a survivor from the Pentagon. Pilots For 9/11 Truth have signed an affidavit in support of Ms Gallop along with providing evidence for the case. Now all that is needed is a fair and just Judge willing to look at the evidence before throwing out the case(14).

Almost Ten years has elapsed since the events of September 11, 2001. There has been no hard evidence linking the claims made by the 9/11 Commission to their conclusions. Even the 9/11 Commission admits they have been lied to and "Set up to fail"(13). Write your Congress, write your Senators, inform them the data being provided by government agencies through the Freedom Of Information Act does not support the 9/11 Commission findings, show them the overwhelming evidence that the data did not come from an American Airlines jet.

Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center Attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow.

(1) Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to American 77 - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/Dennis-Cimino-AA77-FDR.html
(2) Ibid
(3) Notes On Parameters - http://www.warrenstutt.com/AAL77FDRDecoder...Parameters.html
(4) 9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/american_77_h...impossible.html
(5) 757/767 Operating Manual Pre-Flight Checklist - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10795614
(6) Expert Statements - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10795633
(7) Pilots For Truth Forum - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10795631
(8) Aircraft Departure Gate Positional Data Conflicts With Government Story - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/aa77-gate-position.html
(9) In Flight Alignment - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pics/in-flight-align.jpg
(10) 757/767 Operating Manual Pre-Flight Checklist - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10795614
(11) Ibid
(12) Data provided by NTSB - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/FinalFlightComplete.zip
(13) 9/11 Commission Chair Lee Hamilton, "Set up to Fail" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0LBARGBupM
(14) Pilots For 9/11 Truth Sign Affidavit In Lawsuit Brought By Pentagon Survivor - http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon_lawsuit.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Mar 3 2011, 08:53 PM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,716
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Dont forget to share and tweet at top.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maturin42
post Mar 3 2011, 10:37 PM
Post #3





Group: Core Member
Posts: 607
Joined: 18-February 07
From: Maryland, USA
Member No.: 633



Shared. Outstanding post, Rob. handsdown.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Domenick DiMaggi...
post Mar 3 2011, 11:13 PM
Post #4





Group: Contributor
Posts: 312
Joined: 27-August 07
Member No.: 1,875



thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IslandPilot
post Mar 3 2011, 11:36 PM
Post #5





Group: Core Member
Posts: 170
Joined: 16-June 10
From: Western Lake Erie, Ohio, Michigan, Canada
Member No.: 5,099



I couldn't have said it better myself! Good JOB!

I'm sending an email link to my friends, and to My Senator and Rep. in congress tomorrow.

thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif salute.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Mar 4 2011, 12:35 AM
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,716
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Arguments from the GL trolls have been moved to here.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21150
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
aerohead
post Mar 4 2011, 01:26 AM
Post #7





Group: Core Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 13-July 09
From: State of Heightened Awareness
Member No.: 4,476



Nicely manicured and to the point Rob. Well done.

thumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Atomicbomb
post Mar 4 2011, 02:09 AM
Post #8





Group: Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: 28-January 10
Member No.: 4,870



The "AUTO-ALIGNMENT AND GPS" section was a real eye opener for me. I did not know about that juicy little (HUGE) detail. Thanks Rob and thank you to all the Pilots for 9/11 Truth for all your hard work, you are the genuine patriots and I for one am proud to be amoung you all.

Adam Ruff
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tumetuestumefais...
post Mar 4 2011, 06:47 AM
Post #9





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,106
Joined: 7-November 07
From: Prague or France
Member No.: 2,452



Niiice. thumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Mar 4 2011, 06:52 AM
Post #10





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,194
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



Great post there Rob a very succinct account that leaves no wriggle room for any who try to discount the findings of the elite team on here. salute.gif

I wonder what RG would think now?

I don't include myself in that august company BTW as I do not know enough about detailed airline operations to be able to comment that much. On airframe and engine limitations I have some idea. I am still curious as to what the N1 speeds would have been at the airspeeds quoted for the aircraft involved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Mar 4 2011, 07:03 AM
Post #11



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,716
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Mar 4 2011, 06:52 AM) *
I am still curious as to what the N1 speeds would have been at the airspeeds quoted for the aircraft involved.


Download NTSB Data


No signs of a compressor stall, nor transient stall, nor excessive RPM...

Matter of fact, engine vibrations indicate more vibration on takeoff.

More here...
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...t&p=3189160

It seemed to be smooth sailing for such excessive speeds over a standard 757 Vmo.

Just more evidence which shows that the data out-performs a standard 757.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Mar 4 2011, 09:01 AM
Post #12





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,939
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



A very concise statement Rob! salute.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bruce Sinclair
post Mar 4 2011, 11:14 AM
Post #13


Core Member


Group: Contributor
Posts: 154
Joined: 31-March 08
Member No.: 3,074



Very well done, Rob! Congratulations! The truth is being revealed...

Fondest regards,

Bruce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DANDPT
post Mar 4 2011, 12:32 PM
Post #14





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 32
Joined: 10-February 11
Member No.: 5,642



QUOTE (Bruce Sinclair @ Mar 4 2011, 11:14 AM) *
Very well done, Rob! Congratulations! The truth is being revealed...

Fondest regards,

Bruce



Rob...."a fair and just Judge"??? Thanks for the humor!! Dan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SanderO
post Mar 4 2011, 12:41 PM
Post #15





Group: Troll
Posts: 1,174
Joined: 23-December 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,814



Excellent presentation Rob. You nailed it!

Do I understand correctly that at the time the AA aircraft essentially has a sophisticated ded reckoning system which if this is the case would have to start with the correct DR position. Garbage in + garbage out. So at the gate the captain must match the "read out" of his nav system with the coordinated on a chart and cannot depart the gate if they don't match?

Sounds like they can't produce the data because it doesn't actually exist?

Do you think they could have done it... produced this data using a simulator?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
milongal
post Mar 4 2011, 03:01 PM
Post #16





Group: Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: 19-May 08
Member No.: 3,374



Thanks for this information. Very interesting indeed.

If you haven't done so already, this text should be condensed into a succinct format and issued as a straight-forward press release. Bullet-pointing if necessary at the top to catch attention, fleshing out with more detail further below.

You also need to fix the 4 incorrect "it's".
P.3 American Airlines provided ITS own custom-made (missing the hyphen)
P.6 a large error within ITS navigational system
P.6 the ability to update ITS position in flight
P.7 an IRS as ITS primary source for navigation

Thanks for your work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bobcat46
post Mar 4 2011, 03:03 PM
Post #17





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 118
Joined: 27-December 06
From: Hobe Sound, FL
Member No.: 382



Excellent posting, Rob. This is a very handy piece of work to pass on to others.....which I have already done!! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
panthercat
post Mar 4 2011, 04:58 PM
Post #18





Group: Core Member
Posts: 50
Joined: 14-April 07
From: Pahoa, HI
Member No.: 952



Interesting point regarding the GPS discrepancy. If something that huge had actually struck that old wooden building, there should have been considerably more damage.

Since data are plural, its usage should be 'the data are,' not 'the data is."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
truthmatters
post Mar 4 2011, 06:08 PM
Post #19





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 87
Joined: 19-February 09
From: California
Member No.: 4,145



Powerful data. Thank you so much for your research. It is comforting for me to know that credible folks like yourselves are pursuing this. I believe with all my heart and soul that this kind of truth matters.

(I posted the above reply on Facebook then realized I should put it here too.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WhisperingWnd
post Mar 4 2011, 06:31 PM
Post #20





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 21
Joined: 22-January 10
Member No.: 4,858



QUOTE (SanderO @ Mar 4 2011, 12:41 PM) *
Excellent presentation Rob. You nailed it!

Do I understand correctly that at the time the AA aircraft essentially has a sophisticated ded reckoning system which if this is the case would have to start with the correct DR position. Garbage in + garbage out. So at the gate the captain must match the "read out" of his nav system with the coordinated on a chart and cannot depart the gate if they don't match?

Sounds like they can't produce the data because it doesn't actually exist?

Do you think they could have done it... produced this data using a simulator?


SanderO it's worse than that, it must mean there was no real investigation - means the worst of all the possibilities.

Excellent compilation Rob. Your perseverance is very appreciated.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2014 - 07:49 AM