Disputes From The Cesspit, split from latest news Options

[robot]

Just thought you might like to know that the the govt loyalist site forum has spotted your post. Summary - this is old news. Threads were created long ago that discussed these issues.

You guys run out of new evidence and now dressing up old evidence as new?

govtloyalistsite.org/showthread.php?t=66047

Edit. Seems like this software has a sense of humour. It changed the URL.

[onesliceshort]

Just thought you might like to know that the the govt loyalist site forum has spotted your post. Summary - this is old news. Threads were created long ago that discussed these issues.

Yes, and judging by the total annihilation of one of Randi's "expert" posts in this thread, we know that what some label "old news" is usually information that has been been crapped on from a great height watched by nodding dogs. That's not "discussion", Robot, that's J.REF.

What I'd really like explained over there is how the co-ordinates at the gate can be claimed to have been "off"? As must have been the latitudinal coordinates leading from the gate? Then the longitudinal distance to the runway?

But then somehow aligns itself to line up an alleged 125ft wingspan aircraft perfectly within a 200ft wide runway for takeoff?

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pics/INS_IAD_Adjust.jpg)

Blow, smoke and ass. Fill the blanks.