IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

The PenRen Generator?, split & merged threads

Ricochet
post May 14 2008, 01:36 AM
Post #1





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 744
Joined: 25-April 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,225



Would anyone like to discuss the generator trailer? Triaxle, 8'6 x 40' x 13'6"

[EDIT: Generator posts split from here by d:

What Hit The Pentagon? Nothing., Listened to this yesterday
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...=12341&st=0 ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
tnemelckram
post Mar 16 2011, 07:10 PM
Post #2





Group: Contributor
Posts: 766
Joined: 30-January 08
Member No.: 2,690



Hi All!

I'm following up on what dMz said about the relatively low volatility of diesel, propane and other commonly used fuels for common purposes, and the obvious good reasons for using such low volatility fuels when you can have just about any spazz using them(1).

Jet f fuel is more akin to kerosene, which is the common Coleman Stove fuel, and also more akin to diesel and propane, in terms of less volatility. So, for the above given reasons as well as its inherent proximity to commercial airline passengers and likely involvement in disasters that are also likely involve such passengers.

What this means is that for the same reasons that these fuels are not likely to result in secondary pyrotechnics at the Pentagon, they are also not likely to result in the type of "Hot Jet Fuel Fires" that are essential to collapsing the WTC's, and thus also essential to the Official Conspiracy Theory. The WTC's are what really matter, because once you accept this as false the Pentagon must also fall as false, regardless of details such as the fuel source for the things around the Pentagon that appear in the photos.

Napoleon said that all he worried about was destroying the enemy' main body; after that, secondary matters will settle themselves. The WTC's are the enemy's main body, the fuel for things around the Pentagon are secondary matters..

_______________________________
(1) After all, it is known in advance that a high percentage of the campers using these types of fuels in Coleman Stoves and backyard barbecue's are "partying" at he same time. At least that's been my experience!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Mar 17 2011, 03:21 PM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



QUOTE (tnemelckram @ Mar 16 2011, 05:10 PM) *
Hi All!

I'm following up on what dMz said about the relatively low volatility of diesel...

Hi TN,

I think you might be mixing up the different physical properties of several different kinds of fuels here.

First there is quite a bit of information about Jet A and Jet A-1 "jet fuel" on this thread:
Jet Fuel Burn Rates
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...ic=28&st=20

Jet A is basically kerosene (which is also essentially Diesel #1 fuel oil):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_oil
------
"Coleman stove fuel" could be taken to mean White Gas/naphtha, or else canistered (LP gas) propane, or even unleaded automotive-grade "mogas" gasoline (more recently), depending upon whose "Coleman stove" and what vintage. I remember seeing some "dual fuel" Coleman stoves and lanterns a few years back that would use either unleaded automotive gasoline or White Gas (with the White Gas likely being "hotter" and far "cleaner").

White gas/naphtha is HIGHLY volatile, and burns relatively "hot" and "clean" compared to other liquid hydrocarbons (being a relatively low molecular weight petroleum distillate).

QUOTE
Naphtha (pronounced /ˈnæfθə/ or /ˈnæpθə/) normally refers to a number of different flammable liquid mixtures of hydrocarbons, i.e. a distillation product from petroleum or coal tar boiling in a certain range and containing certain hydrocarbons. It is a broad term covering the lightest and most volatile fraction of the liquid hydrocarbons in petroleum. Naphtha is a colorless to reddish-brown volatile aromatic liquid, very similar to gasoline.

In petroleum engineering, full range naphtha is defined as the fraction of hydrocarbons in petroleum boiling between 30 °C and 200 °C.[1] It consists of a complex mixture of hydrocarbon molecules generally having between 5 and 12 carbon atoms. It typically constitutes 15–30% of crude oil, by weight. Light naphtha is the fraction boiling between 30 °C and 90 °C and consists of molecules with 5–6 carbon atoms. Heavy naphtha boils between 90 °C and 200 °C and consists of molecules with 6–12 carbons.

Naphtha is used primarily as feedstock for producing high octane gasoline (via the catalytic reforming process). It is also used in the petrochemical industry for producing olefins in steam crackers and in the chemical industry for solvent (cleaning) applications. Common products made with it include lighter fluid, fuel for camp stoves, and some cleaning solvents.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naphtha

QUOTE
Coleman® Fuel

Also called white gas or camping fuel, you can't beat it for camping in the winter or at high altitude. Burns hot even at subzero temperatures. And unlike butane and propane, output doesn't falter as temperatures drop. Coleman® Fuel is very refined, and burns hotter and cleaner than other liquid fuels. It's relatively inexpensive and not difficult to come by. By carrying the fuel in small refillable fuel bottles, you don't have the disposal considerations you do with empty propane or butane cylinders. But unlike appliances that use those fuels, you do need to fill liquid-fuel appliances. And for steady output, they need to be pumped occasionally to maintain pressure within the fuel tank.
Main advantages: heat output and economy.


http://www.coleman.com/coleman/colemancom/choose_fuel.asp

I remember hearing some 'old timer Conoco station rumors' that White Gas compared to "avgas", but that was before my time and I will "neither confirm nor deny" on that part and I make no guarantees here on any of that, and the specific formulations and properties of specific liquid hydrocarbons can and have changed over time.
---------
Personally, I would classify propane (and natural gas/methane) as fuel/explosive (or else they would not work very well in "spark ignition" internal combustion engines, but I digress). In fact, flour and some dusts can also behave in the fuel/explosive category (similar to propane) in certain conditions:

QUOTE
Silo explosion kills NY assistant chief
Garrett W. Loomis was among firefighters dealing with flare ups at a farm
The Associated Press
HOUNSFIELD, N.Y. ...

http://www.firerescue1.com/volunteer/artic...ssistant-chief/

QUOTE
Grain Silo Explosion Knocks Home Off Foundation
Authorities in Norwalk are investigating what caused a grain elevator to collapse on Ohio Street near North Hester Road. (November 30, 2010)...

http://www.fox8.com/news/wjw-grain-elevato...0,7340334.story

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_explosion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_dust

QUOTE
The Explosive Truth About Modern Flour Mills
By Alexis Madrigal , March 4, 2008 | 1:42 pm

Baking bread might be a relaxing weekend activity, but making the flour that goes into that bread is a dangerous business. Ever since the Washburn flour mill explosion near Minneapolis in 1878 killed 18 people, the milling industry has tried to reduce the risk of flour particles igniting into flour bombs. Unfortunately, that’s tougher than it sounds. In fact, General Mills’ Gold Medal Flour factory, uses "explosion-proof" motors for added protection.

“Flour dust that is suspended in air is more explosive than coal dust," Paul Steinlage, milling manager, told Food Engineering Magazine this month. "With the number of motors we need to run the mill, we absolutely have to have the best explosion-proof motors so we feel protected.”

Throughout agriculture and food processing, there were 115 reported dust explosions [pdf] between 1994 and 2003, the most recent numbers available, most of them in grain elevators.

http://www.oznet.k-state.edu/historicpubli..._Explosions.pdf
...

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/03/the-explosive-t/

Incidentally, I have found that propane stoves, lanterns, and torches do not work well (or sometimes at all) at elevations above 7500 feet, especially in "cold" temperatures.
-------
Here's a little bit about aviation fuel or "avgas" (and both the elevation and "cold" factors have HUGE implications in this context re: carburetor icing, engine timing, etc.):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avgas
-------
Personally, I have tried to transition from both propane and "Coleman fuel" to "woodgas/gasifier" stoves (for both self-sufficiency and high-altitude reasons, in addition to not needing to carry expen$ive, stinky, leaky fuel cans or expen$ive, clanging, often-empty propane cylinders). "Woodgas" is a flammable mixture of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen gas (H2) that is one of the cleanest, hottest burning hydrocarbon fuels in an oxygen "concentrating" stove or oven design (although I haven't seen a barbecue application yet, possibly due to the extremely hot temperatures in the designs that I've seen/"fired" being excessive for barbecuing).

Wood Gas Stove

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wc8aqW4XBs

http://www.woodgas.org.uk/

http://www.woodgas.com/Woodgas%20stove.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_gas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasification
-----
Clear as charcoal? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

EDIT: Maybe I should split a few more posts off from the PenRen Generator thread to a "hydrocarbon fuels" thread?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Mar 20 2011, 09:02 AM
Post #4



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



QUOTE (dMz @ Mar 17 2011, 01:21 PM) *
I remember hearing some 'old timer Conoco station rumors' that White Gas compared to "avgas", but that was before my time and I will "neither confirm nor deny" on that part and I make no guarantees here on any of that, and the specific formulations and properties of specific liquid hydrocarbons can and have changed over time.
---------
Personally, I would classify propane (and natural gas/methane) as fuel/explosive (or else they would not work very well in "spark ignition" internal combustion engines, but I digress). In fact, flour and some dusts can also behave in the fuel/explosive category (similar to propane) in certain conditions:

Speaking ofr CONOCO stations...:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mapplegate/3552852196/#/ [apparently the whiny bitches won't allow 'contact...'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Ricochet   The PenRen Generator?   May 14 2008, 01:36 AM
- - dMole   QUOTE (Ricochet @ May 13 2008, 11:36 PM) ...   Sep 26 2008, 03:09 AM
- - SPreston   A blowup of the gen trailer and the original Berkl...   Sep 26 2008, 10:13 AM
- - dMole   I hope Rico (and JFK) are still around. Here is a...   Sep 27 2008, 04:56 PM
- - Ricochet   QUOTE Have you got a weight or mass for this trail...   Jan 18 2009, 03:42 AM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (Ricochet @ Jan 18 2009, 12:42 AM) ...   Jan 19 2009, 07:42 PM
- - dMole   Actually, using the last recorded SSFDR Gross Weig...   Jan 19 2009, 10:53 PM
- - Ricochet   dMole, I would like you to try a new calculation. ...   Feb 4 2009, 05:04 PM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (Ricochet @ Feb 4 2009, 02:04 PM) ....   Feb 4 2009, 07:52 PM
- - tnemelckram   I have huge problems with the word "projectil...   Feb 5 2009, 09:04 PM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (tnemelckram @ Feb 5 2009, 06:04 PM...   Feb 5 2009, 10:25 PM
|- - tnemelckram   Hi dMole! QUOTE Ummm, incorrect TN. Yep, you...   Feb 6 2009, 09:31 AM
- - Ricochet   I have not heard a convincing argument that an air...   Feb 6 2009, 12:31 PM
- - tnemelckram   Hi All! I'm following up on what dMz said...   Mar 16 2011, 07:10 PM
|- - dMz   QUOTE (tnemelckram @ Mar 16 2011, 05:10 P...   Mar 17 2011, 03:21 PM
|- - dMz   QUOTE (dMz @ Mar 17 2011, 01:21 PM) I rem...   Mar 20 2011, 09:02 AM
- - onesliceshort   You're a legend d! Just what I was looki...   Mar 16 2011, 07:26 PM
|- - dMz   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Mar 16 2011, 05:26...   Mar 17 2011, 03:20 AM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (Mark)What this means is that for the same r...   Mar 16 2011, 07:46 PM
- - dMz   Related threads at: Flight Path And Pentagon Dest...   Mar 17 2011, 02:28 AM
- - dMz   Gathering up a few generator images from the ...   Mar 17 2011, 04:18 AM
- - dMz   QUOTE http://www.uspowerco.com/used/750kw-750kw/.....   Mar 17 2011, 04:32 AM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (d)EDIT: Maybe I should split a few more pos...   Mar 17 2011, 04:36 PM
- - IslandPilot   Hey guys: I don't know what I was thinking...   Mar 17 2011, 05:46 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 11:11 PM