IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Conflict Of Interest (april Gallop's Case)

dadeets
post Apr 16 2011, 10:23 PM
Post #1





Group: Core Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 6-July 08
From: Encinitas, California
Member No.: 3,674



I had my letter to editor published in North County Times (San Diego County) today.

Conflict of interest in 9/11 case

On April 5, a case brought against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Myers raised the bar to a new level for blatant conflict of interest. Judge John M. Walker Jr., a cousin once removed of George Walker Bush, saw no reason to recuse himself when a case charging the former vice president, secretary of defense and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff came before him for appellate review.

The case charges the defendants with responsibility for injuries suffered by April Gallop, an Army employee, and her newborn son at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

Gallop and many others in the 9/11 truth movement contend that explosives were planted inside the Pentagon and that no credible evidence has been presented supporting the theory that Flight 77 actually hit the building. The case before the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals is being heard by a three-judge panel. A motion to have Judge Walker disqualified from hearing the case was denied.

Dwain Deets

Encinitas


It's one of the letters at

http://www.nctimes.com/news/opinion/letter...a69402bce5.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Obwon
post Apr 18 2011, 10:05 AM
Post #2





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 527
Joined: 29-November 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,712



Have a look here:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The 9/11 Operation: A Summary by an 'Anonymous US Military Controlled Demolitions Expert' - VeronicaChapman.com

http://www.veronicachapman.com/nyc911/911TruthMilitary.htm
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The stuff about a nuke, seemed pretty irrational to me, but this guy makes more rational sense
of it, than a lay person would be aware. It will take more looking confirm what he's saying but
he makes a good case for suspending judgment on the issue of nukes.

While the missive suffers a lack of proof reading, it's easy to follow and, artifacts aside there's
much about the use of explosives that is to be taken from this. This is the first I've seen where
the number of charges and the time needed to place them is treated. As well as some interesting
additions one might not easily figure.

The detonators, for instance, he claims would have needed safeties, that a radio signal would
remove before they could be detonated. That's when I remember how Metro Call pagers, with
their "ubiquitous" signals, could reliably reach deep into buildings and other structures, to deliver
the needed activations. Since 10,000 of these detonators would need to be placed, a series of computer controlled pagers, would have been the ideal method. All three pager companies
went out of business/bankruptcy, after 9-11, go figure, eh?

Also he thinks of planting listening devices with the explosive charges, to monitor if they've
been discovered, so that operatives (who didn't know what they were doing), would be able to take the needed actions against anyone who discovered them.

Anyway enjoy the read.

Obwon

More 9-11 links:
http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html

This post has been edited by Obwon: Apr 18 2011, 10:15 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 11:32 PM