Boston Air Traffic Controller/military Liaison - Dodges, Evades, Ignores Pertinent Questions, PilotsFor911Truth.org |

![]() ![]() |
Boston Air Traffic Controller/military Liaison - Dodges, Evades, Ignores Pertinent Questions, PilotsFor911Truth.org |
Jul 5 2011, 01:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
Boston Air Traffic Controller/Military Liaison - Dodges, Evades, Ignores Pertinent Questions
07/05/2011 - (PilotsFor911Truth.org) Mr. Colin Scoggins, a Boston Air Traffic Controller who worked the military liaison desk at Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center on the morning of September 11, 2001, is also a member of the Pilots For 9/11 Truth forum since August 2007 known under the nick-name "Cheap Shot". Co-Founder of Pilots For 9/11 Truth Rob Balsamo recently released a scene to the public from the Pilots For 9/11 Truth latest presentation entitled 9/11: INTERCEPTED. Despite being a registered Forum member since August 2007, Mr. Scoggins finally elected to engage discussion at the Pilots For 911 Truth forum with respect to the information analyzed. After being asked relevant and pertinent questions with all due respect, Mr. Scoggins dodged, evaded and ignored. The few questions Mr. Scoggins elected to answer, his answers were proven to be inaccurate using Scoggins' own words recorded and provided through the Freedom Of Information Act. In the interest of brevity for the purpose of this article, those interested in reading the described exchange and dialogue -- unedited and presented in full -- click here.... The reason for Mr. Scoggins evasion and broken promises are unknown. Mr. Scoggins has claimed early in the above linked dialogue that he will retreat from the discussion if disrespected. Readers will decide. We at Pilots For 9/11 Truth welcome Mr. Scoggins to answer the questions he promised to answer given his role on the morning of September 11, 2001. Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center Attack. The data does not support the government story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials refuse to acknowledge. Pilots For 9/11 Truth Core member list continues to grow. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html for full member list. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/join to join. |
|
|
|
Jul 5 2011, 10:51 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
Where is Cheap Shot?
|
|
|
|
Jul 6 2011, 12:14 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 1,842 Joined: 1-March 07 Member No.: 710 |
indeed. cheap shot. show up. answer the bill of attainder that has been issued. concerning your integrity.
|
|
|
|
Jul 6 2011, 12:50 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 40 Joined: 19-August 10 Member No.: 5,218 |
This story is PUBLISHED at 911NewsCentral.com. Link: http://bit.ly/mXSHYH Follow us on facebook: http://on.fb.me/lFAyVs Exchange banners with us: http://bit.ly/iIiTqT Demand that the Pilots, CIT, and other Pentagon researchers be invited to the Toronto Hearings: http://bit.ly/lwaPIe Thank you!
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2011, 03:57 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
I dont think Colin will return here to answer the relevant questions of statements he made, guys. He did receive a copy of the article so i suppose he now has an excuse to not show up, ie. "They were mean to me!". But as anyone knows who takes the small amount of time reading through the linked conversation, we were very respectful at the time while Colin made broken promise after broken promise saying "I'll answer you tomorrow on that..." while also insulting us.
Colin has had almost a month before the above article was released to answer the questions when he claimed he would address them "tomorrow", almost a month ago. Again, Colin does have a copy of this article as i sent it out to all forum members, who knows.... maybe he will be here "tomorrow" to answer. But if past experience with him is any indication... i doubt it.... If we get a Judge who actually reviews the evidence (preferably one who isnt a cousin of Bush), I'm sure Colin will be called to the stand. As i said in the conversation, he wont be able to escape the questions. I just hope Colin doesn't end up like Barry Jennings before being able to answer. In the email exchanges i have had with Colin, he did express concern over the growing mountain of evidence which conflicts with the govt story, but just didnt want to look into it as it appears he would just as well enjoy the rest of his life, kids and grandkids. Ignorance is bliss. This might also be the reason he doesnt want to come back as there really isnt much of a rational and benign explanation to the information we have uncovered, it may have scared him.. .who knows. |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2011, 04:54 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Extreme Forum Pilot Posts: 1,690 Joined: 13-December 06 From: maryland Member No.: 315 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2011, 03:10 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 744 Joined: 25-April 08 From: Canada Member No.: 3,225 |
I had said years ago that Scoggins was "misdirection".
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2011, 01:41 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 13 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 3,800 |
I had said years ago that Scoggins was "misdirection". I was wondering the other day if anyone has ever met anyone who lost a loved one, family member, or friend on one of those flights. I just can't understand why more people are not talking about this. Please comment if you know someone who was lost and has never been heard from again. Kinda make you wonder if anyone was on those flights at all... |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2011, 02:25 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 1,842 Joined: 1-March 07 Member No.: 710 |
firstly, you know of the jersey girls don't you? had it not been for them, there would have never been any investigation[albeit a compromised one].
and, of course, you know that the right wingers[the bushits], through their mouthpiece glenn beck, identified the jersey girls as anti-american for asking questions. as i recall, he even insisted that the usg should deport them. with that kind of agitprop, do you think you can see how survivors decided to stay silent? then let us ponder on the survivors of 93. all of whom refused to accept a feinberg settlement, as i recall. and then let us reflect upon kenneth feinberg. for whom was he fronting? the usg? the mossad? and let us reflect upon how he conducted the settlements: wasn't it take this money and give up any claims or the usg will f*ck with you forever[think on irs]? i think that if you study on aviation catastrophes, you might conclude that there is an armature of pressuring survivors to relinquish claims, obviating litigation. |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2011, 06:39 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 14 Joined: 5-July 11 Member No.: 6,033 |
Rob,
First, thanks for the fantastic work and tireless effort to help people learn the truth. From the start of that recent exchange when Colin surprisingly suddenly reappeared on this forum, it raises the question, "Why after almost 10 years would someone who clearly is a guilty part of the perps through his exact employment with the military detailed elsewhere in this forum, why would they revisit the issue and bring up reminders of their own massive guilt in the operation?" It doesn't make sense that he came back here and said all the nonsense he said, aside from the insults and non-chalance, as though the mass murders of 2,749 souls that day was of little consequence. Unbelievably, Colin [ (IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumbdown.gif) ] is probably one of the few people with some (even tangential) direct role in the heinous terror crimes (at the very least, foreknowledge that the "Vigilant Guardian" etc. exercises were not the only activities the government had planned for the morning of 9/11/01), who still almost ten years later works in the exact same job as then. Most others quickly attempted to make whatever changes to cover their tracks and trails and be more difficult to find, but not him. His behavior makes no sense, his statements are not in the least believable. As you said Rob, it is straightforward to accept and understand that during an event of that magnitude, with multiple conference calls and other responsibilities, that speaking to so many people could result in someone not being exactly sure of who they spoke to. However, as you also pointed out to him respectfully, he has contradicted himself so many times and then claimed uncertainty or that he was mistaken. In some ways his behavior is a microcosm of the "official story": filled with internal contradictions and impossibilities that there sis no way it can possibly be true. |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2011, 01:53 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
Thanks for the compliments 727fan.
Yeah, i tried to be as respectful as possible with Colin. There is only so much patience one can have with someone who makes broken promises day after day, evades questions being asked, ignores the evidence (and his own words recorded) repeatedly until it has to be transcribed for him, while he also offered insults he later sheepishly claimed he didnt think would offend. Again, Colin may be able to dodge and evade here, but he wont be able to use the same excuse(s) while on the stand. Can you imagine? Colin - "Judge, the man asking questions is being mean to me!" Judge - "No he isnt, he just asked you if you had a nice weekend, now can you answer the relevant questions or not?" Colin - "I'll have an answer for you tomorrow." Judge - "No, you've used that excuse 3 times already, you'll answer now..." Colin - "But, but, but... he is being mean to me!" lol... what a joke.. |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2011, 03:24 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 14 Joined: 5-July 11 Member No.: 6,033 |
Thanks for the compliments 727fan. Yeah, i tried to be as respectful as possible with Colin. There is only so much patience one can have with someone who makes broken promises day after day, evades questions being asked, ignores the evidence (and his own words recorded) repeatedly until it has to be transcribed for him, while he also offered insults he later sheepishly claimed he didnt think would offend. Again, Colin may be able to dodge and evade here, but he wont be able to use the same excuse(s) while on the stand. Can you imagine? Colin - "Judge, the man asking questions is being mean to me!" Judge - "No he isnt, he just asked you if you had a nice weekend, now can you answer the relevant questions or not?" Colin - "I'll have an answer for you tomorrow." Judge - "No, you've used that excuse 3 times already, you'll answer now..." Colin - "But, but, but... he is being mean to me!" lol... what a joke.. Right on Rob, Instead of insanity or no memory, with that behavior he probably would be declared immature more than anything else. If he pleads the 5th, what happens to him. So you agree then that Colin's behavior makes no sense, to suddenly reappear here after all that time has passed, what would it accomplish for him to do that, he was revealed as a liar more than ever before. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 11:41 PM |