IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Anthony Lawson Aka Lawson911 - Confirmed Disinfo

ThoughtCrime7
post Apr 4 2012, 04:48 PM
Post #21





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 8
Joined: 29-March 12
Member No.: 6,762



I just have to weigh in on this - ALawson (Anthony Lawson) made a video which attempted to debunk my video, "South Tower Anomalies III - Addressing the Debunkers".

Link to my video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh7cKDXnS_s...XIv22_UniAc0%3D

Link to ALawson's attempted debunk:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4Jahg9fxM4

---

Many 9/11 researchers are already aware of my video - it has been translated into Russian, French, put out by Brass Check TV, discussed in these forums, etc.

Lawson has a smug, know-it-all delivery, which may fool some people, but it is easy to prove that he is a disinfo agent. For example, his debunk starts with "South Tower Anomalies III.. is a 9/11 MUSIC VIDEO." So right from the start, he tells people that my video this is a music video, as opposed to a research piece. Watch both and decide for yourselves.

Lawson is a particularly dangerous disinfo agent because he appears to be a 9/11 truther by questioning aspects the official 9/11 story, including the collapse of WTC 7.

Luckily, looking at the view counts, as well as the likes and dislikes for both videos, most people are not buying ALaswson's disinfo.

I made only one comment on ALawson's debunking video:
"It is a small honor to be considered influential enough to warrant this small effort".

Cheers
TC7
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Apr 4 2012, 05:40 PM
Post #22



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Yes, as I said, we get it from all sides.

As the old saying goes, you don't get flak unless you're over the target.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
simonshack
post May 8 2012, 01:55 PM
Post #23





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 27
Joined: 4-July 07
Member No.: 1,354



QUOTE (7forever @ Dec 10 2011, 10:30 PM) *
How exactly would the no plane truth go away (...)


This is the sum total of LIVE TV imagery (of a plane shape approaching the WTC) aired on TV on 9/11


"THE 16 SECONDS MAGIC SEQUENCE":


http://www.septclues.com/ANIMATED%20GIF%20...h/16SECONDS.gif

An audio signal is heard on all the TV networks, exactly 17 seconds before we see "FLIGHT 175" impacting WTC2. It may be explained this way:
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2055659#p2055659

Kind regards
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post May 8 2012, 04:25 PM
Post #24





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,067
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



Hi Simon,

The "snap" or "fade to black" seems to have affected normal households



As for the audio caught 17 seconds before impact, I'd have to speculate that the technology used in Manhattan that day may have physically caused it? 2cents.

Have you seen this thread?

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21992
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 12:11 AM