IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Build A 911 Theory From What Fbi Has Suppressed

9elevened
post Sep 10 2011, 07:40 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 27
Joined: 12-January 11
Member No.: 5,583



FBI/FAA refuse to release the serial numbers of plane parts for the 911 planes, which must be pre-recorded by law

FBI refuses to release the impounded phone records for 911 planes passengers and families, even to the 911 Commission. Instead the head of the FBI investigation Michael Chertoff (yet another Zio) provided his own written "summary" of the calls to the Commission. Cell phone calls from the planes were clearly impossible, to the point where debunkers now have to speculate that the hijackers wanted to make sure the calls went out so brought "boosting" equipment aboard themselves! After a 911 reseacher questioned something on American Airlines website, AA spokesman admitted there were no back of seat phones on Flight 77, completely eliminating the ability of Barbara Olson to make the purported phone call (her own husband admitted "confusion" over why she would call the DOJ switchboard collect instead of his direct numbers). The vast majority of calls were purportedly from back of seat phones; at least some of the cell phone calls were made by passengers who had made their reservation only the day before, for a transcontinental flight. Bureau of Transportation website for years showed Flight 77 and Flight 11 were not scheduled to fly on 911.

FBI has not allowed the release of airport departure lounge security footage which might show hijackers or even more importantly passengers (the so-called Dulles footage with no date or time stamp was released by a judge against the government's wishes and none of people in the video look like Hani Hanjour). Israeli-owned ICTS controlled security at all three airports, suggesting the possibility of detaining/rounding up any and all potential passengers.

FBI refuses to release the names involved in their probe of the purported 911 insider trading

The Bloomberg News reported that put options on the airlines (UA/AA officials collaborating in Cheney's plot?) and insurers along with high profile residents of the WTC surged to the phenomenal high of 285 times their average.

and there were call options as well

Raytheon, maker of Patriot and Tomahawk missiles, saw its stock soar immediately after the attack. Purchases of call options on Raytheon stock increased sixfold on the day before the attack. Raytheon employees were aboard every flight that hit a target (perhaps as part of Cheney's war games, not knowing their eventual fate?).

Five-year US Treasury notes were purchased in abnormally high volumes before the attack, and their buyers were rewarded with sharp increases in their value following the attack.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
9elevened
post Sep 12 2011, 08:13 PM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 27
Joined: 12-January 11
Member No.: 5,583



the FBI decided that the 911 insider trading (what Bloomberg News called "naked insider selling" and "up to 300 time the average") was not unusual after all and closed their probe

(much like the feebies are the only ones who believe the anthrax attacker, by his letters to editors revealed to be a virulent Christian Zionist, could have acted alone)

if the Feebs had released the insider names they were probing, they would also be automatically naming potential collaborators in the airlines and elsewhere to the plot

The FBI also refuses to release any security video from departure lounges at the three airports. All three airports were controlled by Israeli/Mossad-owned ICTS, who thus had control over any and all planes, hijackers, passengers, innocent bystanders . . .

if the FBI has footage of hijackers boarding planes why don't they boost their case by showing it . . .

or would it all be video of empty departure lounges, passengers being escorted away by Israeli/Mossad-owned security

there is video of Atta going through security in Maine, and why he went to Maine first and then took a plane to Boston remains a mystery, especially given that purported Dulles security shows "Hanjour's" crew going through security at Dulles.

Except the Dulles footage contains no date or time stamp

Thus the video is either not Dulles security footage, or the date and time are somehow obscured

the only reason to do that is if the video was not made on 911

the video was ordered released by a judge in a 911 suit, over the objections of the government

and none of the people in the video resembles Hani Hanjour
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
23investigator
post Sep 12 2011, 11:33 PM
Post #3





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 376
Joined: 28-November 10
From: Australia
Member No.: 5,467



[quote name='9elevened' date='Sep 13 2011, 09:43 AM' post='10801129']
if the Feebs had released the insider names they were probing, they would also be automatically naming potential collaborators in the airlines and elsewhere to the plot

The FBI also refuses to release any security video from departure lounges at the three airports. All three airports were controlled by Israeli/Mossad-owned ICTS, who thus had control over any and all planes, hijackers, passengers, innocent bystanders . . .

if the FBI has footage of hijackers boarding planes why don't they boost their case by showing it . . .

or would it all be video of empty departure lounges, passengers being escorted away by Israeli/Mossad-owned security

Dear '9elevened'.

Thankyou.
Hope your summary is going to continue.

Robert
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
9elevened
post Sep 15 2011, 05:57 PM
Post #4





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 27
Joined: 12-January 11
Member No.: 5,583



<Dear '9elevened'.

Thankyou.
Hope your summary is going to continue.>

thanks

Zios Cheney and Rumsfeld were members of PNAC created by UberZio Kristol

(PNAC's September 2000 manifesto: "we sure could use a New Pearl Harbor!")

and Colin Powell has lately said through his spokesman that he was misled on Iraq by what he called the "JINSA crowd" (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) led by Cheney-Rumsfeld

<On four flights eight pilots were subdued without even one of them being able to send a signal of any kind to anyone that there was trouble. >

including Burlingame pilot of Flight 77, a former Navy flyer who had just finished advising the Pentagon and participating in drills involving just such an attack on the Pentagon (including I have read hitting the very same spot!)

Defense contractor Raytheon employees directly linked to their pilotless flight program were aboard all 911 planes that hit a target.

Were they participating in Cheney's war games, but told the planes would be safely landed after a staged international incident? Using the "safe landing" technology already installed on Boeings, that German airline Lufthansa had previously stripped from their Boeing contracts citing "security concerns"?

from another thread: <After being hijacked within six seconds, Flight 11 headed straight towards one of the two primary radar gaps on the east coast; arriving seven minutes later and turning off its transponder at the precise time of hitting the cusp of a primary radar gap. It then continued for another six minutes, on its north westerly course away from target for a total of 13 minutes before turning south. Flight 77 switched off its transponder right next to an area with no primary radar coverage and within a tri-section of weak radar coverage. It also passes through the largest hole in primary radar existing at the time. United Flight 175 switched off its transponder right next to United Flight 93. Flight 93 not only switched off its transponder right next to an area with no primary radar coverage; but it made its U-turn back within a tiny westerly peninsula of the radar gap.

Who provided the alleged hijackers with the radar gap information as well as the timing and ability to exploit same>

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
9elevened
post Sep 15 2011, 08:13 PM
Post #5





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 27
Joined: 12-January 11
Member No.: 5,583



<Defense contractor Raytheon employees directly linked to their pilotless flight program were aboard all 911 planes that hit a target.

Were they participating in Cheney's war games, but told the planes would be safely landed after a staged international incident?>

outside control of any and all planes is possible (hit and/or flyovers/bombs). Planes could have been controlled from the third plane witnessed by Diane Sawyer at the WTC and the since govt-admitted command and control plane over DC (Pentagon). By the same means any original planes could have been flown to other destinations or simply crashed in remote areas (or the Atlantic Ocean). There were early reports of a plane crash in remote area of the Rockies on 911.

from Inside Job by Jim Marrs:

Von Buelow (former German secretary of defense and critic of the official story who quoted remote control theories by Joe Vialls) could well have knowledge of this technology as several researchers and websites have stated Lufthansa, Germany's national airline, was aware of the possibility of electronic capture and had quietly stripped the flight control systems out of American built jetliners in the early 1990s.





Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DoYouEverWonder
post Sep 15 2011, 11:31 PM
Post #6





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 770
Joined: 1-February 09
Member No.: 4,096



QUOTE
<On four flights eight pilots were subdued without even one of them being able to send a signal of any kind to anyone that there was trouble. >


What most people don't know is that every plane also had at least one passenger that was also a very experienced pilot. So that every plane actually had 3 pilots. Some of the pilots were Top Gunners and one was an astronaut. So even if the pilot and co-pilot were incapacitated, there was still one more person on board who could have flown the plane.

BTW: All of the planes had at least one pilot that was a zionist xian.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd October 2014 - 12:22 AM