IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Introduction Of Heiwa, Planes should not collide with towers

mrmitosis
post Dec 9 2011, 04:25 PM
Post #101





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 213
Joined: 11-February 10
From: Australia
Member No.: 4,909



I wouldn't hire this clown to do a safety appraisal on a cubby house.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Dec 10 2011, 10:38 AM
Post #102



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,959
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



i'm not even sure what is being debated here other than fluff, it's like everyone's getting upset about what they "think" others are thinking.

It was a gravity collapse, because the supports were blown out,
the floors were pulled down by the collapsing core, and could not have pancaked.

The official governments story has been proven to be wrong and falsified.
But has been used to justify invasions, and never ending wars,
and to impose more control over lives and livelihoods, of billions.

And the result of this all this will be that 1 million euros in winnings,
will not be worth anymore than the plastic they are printed on.

...which could be substantial, now that i think about it.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Dec 10 2011, 11:59 AM
Post #103





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,773
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Heiwa

My point is that the claim, advanced by anybody, not just you, that all photos are fake is some form of sophistry advanced by the simple minded.

I fully understand that SOME photos are manipulated. No problem there. And maybe this photo you're talking about here IS manipulated. I don't really care if it is or not, 10 years after.

We know the towers came down with explosives, and we know that the aviation details of the Official Conspiracy Theory are utterly fabricated. Who really cares if they've thrown some manipulated photos into the fawning corporate media? I do not.

Fake photos are a given, but you act as though this is somehow new information.

The Big Picture is that the OCT is a damn lie and the perpetrators will never be taken to trial.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Heiwa
post Dec 11 2011, 05:54 AM
Post #104





Group: Troll
Posts: 34
Joined: 5-November 11
Member No.: 6,445



QUOTE (amazed! @ Dec 10 2011, 11:59 AM) *
Heiwa

My point is that the claim, advanced by anybody, not just you, that all photos are fake is some form of sophistry advanced by the simple minded.

I fully understand that SOME photos are manipulated. No problem there. And maybe this photo you're talking about here IS manipulated. I don't really care if it is or not, 10 years after.

We know the towers came down with explosives, and we know that the aviation details of the Official Conspiracy Theory are utterly fabricated. Who really cares if they've thrown some manipulated photos into the fawning corporate media? I do not.

Fake photos are a given, but you act as though this is somehow new information.

The Big Picture is that the OCT is a damn lie and the perpetrators will never be taken to trial.


The fake pictures - all CGI - of the destructions (and also of the rubble afterwards) are just illustrations of my little 911 contribution that, from a simple structural damage analysis aspect, gravity cannot produce the destruction, i.e. little weak top C crushing intact bottom A into rubble B by gravity. I offer anybody €1M to prove me wrong. Isn't that generous? It is my contribution.
The alternative, to destroy the towers from top down by explosives, is too complicated.
Much easier from bottom up.
So how was it done?
First bombs were exploded on some floors in WTC1/2 blowing paper all over lower Manhattan and 'plane-shaped' holes were also made in the walls. What was shown live on TV was all CGI; planes, holes, fire balls, smoke, etc. Fake plane parts and debris were placed in the streets (taken out from some trucks there) and photographed. Fake photographers were also active taking fake pictures and so on. The area was then evacuated and the towers brought down from bottom up using standard controlled, noisy demolition methods = the only way to destroy or demolish the towers.

It will become public knowledge sooner or later, believe me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Dec 11 2011, 06:04 AM
Post #105



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,959
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



It must have taken months of planning, and contingency planning. i remember a few days before 9/11 there were stories about "suitcase nukes" in the media. But they went with the story of planes, instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Heiwa
post Dec 21 2011, 03:27 AM
Post #106





Group: Troll
Posts: 34
Joined: 5-November 11
Member No.: 6,445



QUOTE (lunk @ Dec 11 2011, 06:04 AM) *
It must have taken months of planning, and contingency planning. i remember a few days before 9/11 there were stories about "suitcase nukes" in the media. But they went with the story of planes, instead.


Not really - the perps copied/pasted most details of the attack plan from US DoD as they had already imagined all possible terror tactics and then they added some stunt men from, e.g. fundamentalist organisations to document the show.
http://letsrollforums.com/only-photographs...-t26714p44.html
It doesn't look complicated or time consuming.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 02:35 PM