Duhbunkers try to explain ACARS and fail Options

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

And of course, we see the obsessoids over at the govt loyalist cesspool scurrying, looking for and expecting an immediate explanation from the nameless faceless "experts". This individual can't even think or research for themself, they have to seek comfort in answers from the groupthink tank.

"I'm sure it's here somewhere, but can someone steer me to the debunk of this rubbish-"

This post has been edited by Aldo Marquis CIT: Dec 1 2011, 05:49 AM

[911analyzer]

Thanks again for bringing this information to light.

I made a post about it at ATS:
http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread781617/pg1

It was generally well received, however, debunkers are claiming that the last line does NOT denote when the message was received and acknowledged from the aircraft. One guy said it was when the message was printed, and that data could get backed up before hitting the telex.

There are a lot of subsequent posts over there describing ACARS, but it appears there are also a lot of varying formats of text display associated with it. I think this is causing a lot of confusion- no doubt exactly what the "Q" unit is tasked to do.

The big question everyone has is what exactly does that last line mean. There is the trouble, and someone needs to refute or confirm this. We need additional confirmation Rob, that this last line is indeed what you claim it is.

[911analyzer]

Thanks again for bringing this information to light.

I made a post about it at ATS:
http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread781617/pg1

It was generally well received, however, debunkers are claiming that the last line does NOT denote when the message was received and acknowledged from the aircraft. One guy said it was when the message was printed, and that data could get backed up before hitting the telex.

There are a lot of subsequent posts over there describing ACARS, but it appears there are also a lot of varying formats of text display associated with it. I think this is causing a lot of confusion- no doubt exactly what the "Q" unit is tasked to do.

The big question everyone has is what exactly does that last line mean. There is the trouble, and someone needs to refute or confirm this. We need additional confirmation Rob, that this last line is indeed what you claim it is.

The correct URL to the ATS thread is http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread781617/pg1

WTF, I didn't post that URL, did you edit it Rob?

[rob balsamo]

The correct URL to the ATS thread is http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread781617/pg1

WTF, I didn't post that URL, did you edit it Rob?

lol... the forum automatically edits the url as I prefer to not subject our readers to sites which are loaded with malware and spyware, linked from us.

If you want to post the url without being filtered, just wrap code tags around it and readers can copy/paste the url to their browser...

like this...

CODE

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread781617/pg1

By the way, you may want to inform them that there are many ACARS messages in the FOIA pdf which do not have the second time stamp. Does this mean it wasn't sent to the printer? If so, how did it get printed?

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/acars/Team7_Box13_UAL_ACARS.pdf

The second time stamp is the time the message was received by the airplane, as described by Ed Ballinger.

Feel free to tell "gman" to come on over if he wants to learn how the system works, especially Category A and B Flight Tracking.