Debunkers Respond To Dennis Cimino, A Few Comments Copy & Pasted
Mar 16 2012, 06:50 PM
Group: Private Forum Pilot
Joined: 11-February 10
Member No.: 4,909
Edit by Rob Balsamo - I would like to make it clear that Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not endorse the No Plane Theory nor the article mentioned in the OP.
I personally have not read the article in detail, nor do i intend to. People are free to make their own choices.
Please keep in mind the disclaimer in white text at the top of the forum when reviewing this thread and the article referenced.
Dennis Cimino posted an article on Veterans Today earlier this week discussing the Pentagon attack and the unresolved issues within the FDR data.
Debunkers are already talking about it. I'd appreciate any responses to the comments below, to help me deal with a particularly loathsome GL on YouTube. (If not, I'm sure I can manage on my own...it'll just take a little bit longer (IMG:style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif) ...)
If he knows what hes talking about, why does he insist the FDR recorder shows the plane flying just over the West Wing of the White House on its way to the Penty, when even the twoofies pilots admit it shows no such thing?
Why does Dennis the ignorant fux insist the plane was heading 180, made a 330 degree right hand turn, then impact at heading 070. I mean HONESTLY, you fuxing moron, before pretending someone is an expert. Before pretending somone knows what he is talkin gabout, dont you think its a good ideaq to find out if the idiot can do SIMPLE FUXING 3RD GRADE ARITHMETIC FIRST?!?!?!?!??!?!?!
I mean Jesus tittfuxing christ! Even the little drooler picture Dennis drew of the AA77 flight path doesnt even show a 270 degreee turn. Instantly noticeable to anyone not a complete idiot (like Goebbels is) Yet Dennis the Moron keeps insisting a less than 270 degreee turn was an exact 330 degree turn? LMGDAOOOO
Dennis the Moron debunks herself frequently. At one moment (supposedly disproving a claim that data can sit in a buffer for several seconds before being recorded) that the FAR requires the data to be accurately recorded at least once a second. Then dismisses the Radar Altimiter data that disproves the "380 above the light poles" lie due to a magic carpet that was following the plane around, remaining underneath the Radalt ant. making it read falsely low--AND then claiming the Radal data is (contrary to previous claims) ofte ntimes "in lag" by several seconds. Dennis the Moron cant even keep his story straight. No wonder anyone with the smallest SHRED of aviation and avionics knowledge long ago dismissed his bullshit.
This post has been edited by rob balsamo: Mar 19 2012, 03:20 PM
Mar 23 2012, 12:04 PM
Joined: 16-August 06
Member No.: 10
NPT=no planes theory. Not non-impact theory. No planes theory originally and ONLY applied to the asinine disinformation /theories that no planes hit the towers. Disinformation operatives like fetzer and the anonymous Killtown desperately try to link the term to the genuine investigations done by PFT, CIT, and Dom DiMaggio proving there were planes and they didn't hit the target.
There were planes used on 9/11 at all events.
This Disinformation using the term "no planes" is designed to and HAS hurt the truth movement. It has divided it and allowed us to look inept and kooky.
Do you understand? Just because you redefine the term to mean something else in an attempt to play some type of kumbaya peacemaker doesn't mean the rest of the world defines the term the same way.
Planes hit the towers, videos were not faked.
Food for thought:
I've mentioned this story before. I met fetzer at the LA conference where Charlie Sheen spoke. After fetzer's little disinfo presentation he was swarmed by an older crowd of groupies. He had been promoting the "blue tarp box carrying something secret out of the pentagon" and I wanted to inform that it was one of the things he had been incorrect about and that it was just a blue tent rescuers were bringing onto the lawn. Well as I go up to him and tell him this and correct him, inadvertently in front of his adoring followers, he flips out and very forcefully and very aggressively insists I'm wrong. He literally, and angrily, gets in my face to talk me down, in an almost accusatory fashion. I found it too bizarre to be the behavior of a "scholar".
Well he was wrong about the "blue tarp box". Very wrong. He insisted he was right. As if I was telling him the sky was a different color other than blue.
So what makes him right or even qualified to comment on shit like exotic holograms or cgi pre-planned Tv. Why is no one using their brain and asking themselves why they supposedly spent incredible resources on a few crystal clear cgi scenes(while apparently using unclear ones as well), but completely dropped the ball when it came to the grainy and nearly indescernible pentagon videos?
Bottom line: scholarsfor911truth divide and conquer+constant disinfo+no planes+bizarre and forceful behavior+ex-marine+academia being infiltrated=fetzer is an operative.
I don't know what motivates him or what allegiance he has that he is doing this for, but it's clear he is doing it. He is like a cancer on the movement. That's what they do, they attach themselves like tumors and destroy/chip away from within.
Btw, for those reading, if he ever gets in my face or that close to me again he's going to experience a much different outcome.
This post has been edited by Aldo Marquis CIT: Mar 23 2012, 12:18 PM
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 02:40 AM|