Wtc Misrepresentations: New Book, Requesting Feedback Options

[MajorTom]

I am a new poster here. Hello to all participants and readers


This is the draft version of a book on the WTC collapses:


Introduction
1: Science vs Subjective Viewpoints
2: WTC Collapses Misrepresented
....2.1: Progressive Floor Collapse in the WTC Towers
....2.2: Purpose of the NIST Reports
....2.3: NIST WTC1 Misrepresentation
....2.4: NIST WTC7 Misrepresentation
....2.5: NIST WTC2 Misrepresentation
....2.6: Bazant Misrepresentation of Collapse Progression
....2.7: Block Mechanics
....2.8: AE911T Misrepresentations of the Collapses
3: Toward Accurate Collapse Histories
4: Reassessing the Question of Demolition
5: Collapses Misrepresented as a False Choice
6: Testing the Thesis for Validity
Author's Conclusions




The same table of contents is on my website, second menu down, here.


Thank you for any questions or feedback to help improve the book.

[onesliceshort]

Hi Tom

Now, if one can sustain floor collapses until the earth stops the process, then perhaps there is a tricky way to utilize this caged, confined process which makes intentional demolition much easier than previously thought within the unique layouts of these buildings.

I personally think that the answer lies in how two buildings struck at different areas (one more central than the other), at different heights, can fall basically in the same fashion and at the same rate of collapse (I know I've oversimplified it - being a layman)

And yes, there are multiple anomalies with the initiation of collapse of WTC1.

http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/index....osition=155:155

The vibration seconds before the "rush" of smoke. The total non effect on the visible fires by whatever caused this same rush of smoke. And for me personally, the smoke that seems to cling to the western facade even though it's not sheltered from the wind (seems to be a balancing act between internal and external forces). All occurring above the impact zone.

I'm speculating on an explosive event within the core, the blast of which has been funneled through the elevator shafts. Possibly at a much lower location. Problem is, I don't know how this would initiate the collapse.

I'm just throwing that example of my (untrained eye) observations out there for discussion's sake.

[SanderO]

I'm speculating on an explosive event within the core, the blast of which has been funneled through the elevator shafts. Possibly at a much lower location. Problem is, I don't know how this would initiate the collapse.

I'm just throwing that example of my (untrained eye) observations out there for discussion's sake.

Oh My..OSS speculates! But doesn't know how the explosive would initiate the collapse. Here is where understand the structure and the mechanism/mechanics of the collapse initiation are critical.

Yet when I propose a speculation about the collapse of B7 based on the mechanism and the mechanics of that tower I am roundly criticized for speculation and not providing bullet proof evidence... despite the speculation matching the observables. Interesting OSS. Very telling.