IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The $2,000,000,000,000+ Cost Of Two Wars Is Chump Change Compared To This, … and there's a conspiracy in progress much bigger than 9/11, too

paulmichael
post Aug 4 2012, 03:49 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 73
Joined: 6-July 12
Member No.: 6,923



Did you know that $9,000,000,000,000 in off-the-books transactions occurred at the Federal Reserve Bank over the last year or so, and the Inspector General of the bank has no idea where it went?

Check out the Youtube video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=playe...p;v=1QK4bblyfsc .

You probably already know that Donald Rumsfeld went public just before the 9/11 attacks stating that two-and-a-half trillion dollars of defense money cannot be accounted for.

It's been estimated, that to repair or replace America's crumbling infrastructure, it will, coincidentally cost, $2,000,000,000,000, but the priorities of the voracious parasitical maggot-fat-cats in this kleptocracy saw things differently.

They spent the $2,000,000,000,000 on fun and games blowing off people's heads and limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan while the future of America and its infrastructure are in dying states. (BTW, as long as I brought up Iraq and Afghanistan… George dubya Bush, shortly after 9/11, stated that we will go after terrorists and the countries that harbor them. Well, more recently, The Newark Star-Ledger published an article with a world map indicating the countries where al Qaeda operatives are allegedly active. There were at least a dozen such countries indicated. Why did we not go to war in upwards of a dozen countries? Why, just Iraq and Afghanistan? Well, as a wise man once said: "It's all about the money!")

The TWO TRILLION DOLLAR estimate to repair and replace America's crumbling infrastructure is way, way, way off the mark because it surely does not factor in all the sinkholes that are in various stages of development around the country and which will cost an estimated MILLION DOLLARS per occurrence to fix.

These sinkholes to which I refer are the direct outcome of a governmental conspiracy and cover-up that is much greater than the 9/11 conspiracy and cover-up, at least in terms of the immeasurable number of willing governmental participants on ALL levels of government, federal, state, county and local.

What I am getting at is the fact that the New York Metro area and the entire states of New Jersey and Connecticut are absolutely drug (meth) lab infested, yet D.E.A. drug lab bust statistics show absolutely zero drug lab busts for the entire states of New Jersey and Connecticut for recent years. And you will never, never hear of a drug lab bust in the downstate New York area on the televised news.

You will hear of many fires and explosions on the news but never will you hear of one of these incidents being attributable to drug lab activities.

Not only do drug (meth) labs pose an extreme fire and explosion risk, but drug lab operators produce a very disproportional amount of toxic waste relative to finished product. This waste has to go somewhere with that somewhere typically being down a drain. From there it usually ends up in a municipal sewer line. After years of such abuse, the sewer line will become breached and leak causing erosion of soil and an eventual sinkhole, a very expensive eventuality to remediate.

Let's put things into perspective. Check out the webpage (dated January 2, 2010) at http://www.nowpublic.com/world/canadian-re...hetamine-drug-l whose closing paragraph states: "The RCMP estimate there are 18,000 drug labs currently operating in the lower mainland of British Columbia."

If there were, two years ago, 18,000 drug labs in British Columbia, does this mean, by contrast, that the populations of the NYC Tri-state area are angelic having absolutely NO drug labs as evidenced by zero drug lab busts over the last few years? OH, GIVE ME A BREAK.

The fact of the matter is that this entire region is absolutely infested with drug labs. By my sampling, I can personally attest that every single hotel and every single multiple dwelling in this very wealthy county of my residence is absolutely infested with drug labs. And because it's been said that drug labs are more commonly in private homes than in apartments, then there are an untold number of labs in private homes, and if you raise issue with such illegal activities YOU WILL BE RUN OUT OF TOWN after you have been played for a rank fool by every government agency which, now, these days, hail FROM THE TWILIGHT ZONE!

The government chooses to protect landlords, mortgage companies, the hotel industry and along with it the rest of the travel industry, all while putting its population including children at risk for uncertain ill-health effects.

Paul Michael
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paulmichael
post Aug 4 2012, 05:45 PM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 73
Joined: 6-July 12
Member No.: 6,923



In the Youtube video referenced in the original post, did you take notice of how the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve System, when posed with probing questions, responded in an unsettled coy manner? She danced around questions and answered them off the mark of how they were asked, but, I guess, from the standpoint of her masters, her performance rating was "exemplary."

On yet another front, there was a "60 Minutes" segment entitled "Medicare Fraud: A $60 Billion Fraud," that's $60 Bil per year. This segment goes back to late 2009.

A written account of the segment can be fount at: http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-18560_162-6825...ain;contentBody .

The video segment is at: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6837797n .

The point I want to make is that Steve Kroft interviewed Kim Brandt, Medicare's Director of Program Integrity. Steve Kroft tells her, of rampant Medicare fraud, point-blank:" It doesn't seem like you're doing a very good job."

Ms. Brandt sighs and in a breathy voice expresses her own frustration and then goes on to blame limited resources for oversight and enforcement.

ARRRRRRGGGGGG!!!! How many times have I seen that routine: nothing but sighs and breathy frustration with one's own ineptitude, incompetence, and ineffectiveness? ARRRRGGGGGG!!!! How many times have I heard the passing of the buck to those who hold the purse strings of budgets?

You, yourselves, probably witnessed a person of extreme ineptitude and ineffectiveness holding a job, and it totally confounds you how someone like that can be awarded a job and hold it. Well, when you are presented with a situation that should be simple to figure out, but, for the life of you, you cannot do so, all that you need do is to fast-forward to a conclusion that there is some underlying dishonesty at play there; it's just a matter of determining the exact nature of the dishonesty.

Consider this excerpt from the first reply in thread "Why There's So Much Dishonesty In Gov't (and In The Private Sector, Too)" in the Debate forum:
Similarly, let's say that that same [politically correct] manager is under the gun to promote a female. Will this manager be more likely to select and promote the best possible female in the area, or will he be more likely to select and promote the absolutely worst female in the area?

Here's a hint for you from which you should be able to derive your answers: I've worked at some major corporations, household names actually, and I have witnessed some jaw-dropping atrocities... some jaw-dropping abominations.

Grossly incompetent workers are in their position for reasons of someone else's dishonest agenda. It's just that plain. It's just that simple

It's just that plain and simple in the case of the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve System, and it's just that plain and simple in the case of Kim Brandt and $60 Bil in Medicare fraud, year in and year out.

Now is an apropos time to reiterate: NINE ELEVEN NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF IT WERE NOT FOR THE MINDSET OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND THE SOCIOLOGICAL BONDS/ALLIANCES THAT ARISE THEREFROM.

Early on in my corporate career at Merrill Lynch, I and the guys would witness some mind-blowing personnel decisions, and we would just laugh it off. Well, the year 2001 rolled around, and I am not laughing any more.

Paul Michael
P.S. Be sure to check out the trio of my postings in the Debate forum:
"1,000+ Governmental Accomplices To 9/11? Sure, Why Not?"
"Why There's So Much Dishonesty In Gov't (and In The Private Sector, Too)";
"The Minds Of Strippers And Whores Are Very Telling"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paulmichael
post Aug 5 2012, 05:12 AM
Post #3





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 73
Joined: 6-July 12
Member No.: 6,923



You know, if you are a fat-cat top-ranking executive coming out of a corporate culture like Halliburton and you step into a top-ranking elected governmental post, you'd just instinctively smell in the air a social/psychological climate ripe for a conspiracy with very little recruiting and organization needing to be done because most of the pieces of the puzzle would have been already pre-placed, and so I say…

"1,000+ Governmental Accomplices To 9/11? Sure, Why Not?" (See: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=22120 .)

And I also shout: NINE ELEVEN NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF IT WERE NOT FOR THE MINDSET OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND THE SOCIOLOGICAL BONDS/ALLIANCES THAT ARISE THEREFROM.

Paul Michael
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 04:20 AM