IPBFacebook




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
What About Enginer Power/performance?, parasitic drag vs. thrust capacity

EagleEye
post Nov 4 2014, 11:26 PM
Post #1





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 101
Joined: 18-December 13
Member No.: 7,630



I've just raised this issue in a posting on reddit at r/conspiracy titled

The 9/11 Smoking Gun: NTSB Radar Report - At 590 Mph, the Plane then ACCELERATED, in near level flight, near sea level, to retain a 510 knots groundspeed, before hitting the South Tower at around the 79th floor level.

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comment...ort_at_590_mph/

Very curious to find out more, and to get an idea as to just how much more powerful the engines would have to be to provide propulsion and thrust at such an airspeed and altitude.

Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th December 2017 - 02:48 PM