IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
9/11 Go Public In Danish And Uk Courts

Tamborine man
post Mar 17 2015, 09:53 AM
Post #1





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 951
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 1,315



Dr. Niels Harrit, most people here knows.

Jan Utzon is the son of the Danish Architect Jorn Utzon, who designed

the Sydney Opera house in Australia.

Jan is himself a respected Architect in Denmark. Hope therefore that many

newspapers will cover this court case:

http://csglobe.com/911-evidence-to-go-publ...-and-uk-courts/

Cheers

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: Mar 17 2015, 09:56 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Mar 19 2015, 08:50 AM
Post #2





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Good news! I hope justice and truth can still be found in the Danish system. The US system is corrupt beyond recognition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthissweet
post Mar 19 2015, 01:59 PM
Post #3





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 245
Joined: 25-August 14
From: Third rock from the sun
Member No.: 7,913



QUOTE (Tamborine man @ Mar 17 2015, 08:53 AM) *
Dr. Niels Harrit, most people here knows.

Jan Utzon is the son of the Danish Architect Jorn Utzon, who designed

the Sydney Opera house in Australia.

Jan is himself a respected Architect in Denmark. Hope therefore that many

newspapers will cover this court case:

http://csglobe.com/911-evidence-to-go-publ...-and-uk-courts/

Cheers



From Tambourine Man's article:
QUOTE
And in a separate court case in the UK related to 9/11, Matt Campbell of Sussex will go to Hastings Magistrates Court on March 23 claiming the UK state broadcaster the BBC engaged in “covering up evidence relating to 9/11 and evidence” relating to the murder of his brother Geoff, who was killed inside the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.


Here is info on Matt Campbell case:
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/brother...leged-cover-up/
QUOTE
The following are some of the points of evidence that Mr Campbell cites as supporting the allegation that the three towers that collapsed on 9/11 collapsed due to controlled, explosive demolition. This is not a complete list of Mr Campbell’s evidence:

1. Confirmed free fall of WTC Building 7
World Trade Centre Building 7 fell at free-fall acceleration for at least 2.25 seconds (105 feet/8 stories) as confirmed in 2008 by the official investigators NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). This means that at least 8 stories of the building collapsed with absolutely zero structural resistance within them, and that all 80 of the core steel columns, and all of the steel beam cross connections for those 8 stories had to have been completely severed, all within a split second of each other in order to achieve the perfectly symmetrical free fall collapse that is seen in WTC Building 7. The only thing that can achieve this is controlled-demolition using carefully placed explosives and perfectly timed detonation. Controlled Demolition of a high rise tower cannot be prepared within a few hours. It takes weeks or months to plan and implement

2. BBC foreknowledge of the unprecedented collapse of WTC Building 7
Apart from the three towers that collapsed on 9/11, no steel frame building has ever collapsed from fire in history, either before or since 9/11. High rise towers are designed specifically so that this cannot happen. However on that day the BBC reported on live television that WTC Building 7 had collapsed more than 20 minutes before it actually collapsed. While the buildings collapse was being reported to the world by a BBC journalist, the fully intact building could still be seen standing in the background in what appeared to be a relatively uncompromised state and no obvious fires of any consequence. This footage is still available to see on YouTube. This would suggest that someone likely knew that the building was going to come down in a controlled manner and that the BBC reporter had inadvertently been given this information a little too early.

How did anyone know that the building was going to collapse as a result of simple office fires, as is NIST’s official explanation, when fire has never caused this to happen to any other building in history, apart from on that day, and it is physically impossible for fires to reach even close to the required temperature to even begin to weaken steel? Why did the BBC not actively investigate where that foreknowledge of collapse came from and inform the police or investigators, and the public? How did the source of that information know that the building was going to come down if a symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration is impossible from office fires and is unprecedented in history?

3. The BBC’s misinformation & refusal to notify the public about critical and incontrovertible evidence
In 2007 the BBC ran a documentary which claimed that despite what hundreds of professional engineers, physicists, demolition experts, and scientists were claiming about free fall of WTC Building 7, they were in fact wrong and there was no free fall of WTC Building 7. Even after NIST, the official investigators, officially confirmed the existence of free fall in 2008 the BBC has refused to comply with the requirements of their own Editorial Guidelines and publicly correct their error about this absolutely vital issue. This is despite a number of professional experts and more than 500 members of the public making written requests in 2012 to the BBC for them to do so. The BBC still has not corrected this error and still has not informed the public of the quite incredible fact that in 2008 NIST officially confirmed the existence of free fall of WTC Building 7, which can only occur through controlled demolition.

In addition to this, a great deal more incontrovertible evidence supporting the controlled demolition of the three towers has been forwarded to the BBC by numerous professional experts and hundreds of the public, but the BBC has refused to show this evidence to the public. This includes eye witness testimonies from 118 first responder fire fighters on 9/11 who reported hearing or seeing explosions going off in all three towers. These eye witness reports were originally suppressed by the US government, but were later forced to be released through the Freedom of Information Act.


Both cases really don't mean a whole lot. Do not expect some eventful decision. That is what gatekeepers do: screw up real 911 researchers quest for an honest case in court. Ellen Mariani and Willie Rodriguez come to mind. Both gatekeepers who keep people still in the 911 Stone Age happy because they think these two are so wonderful taking cases to court. Wake up.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NP1Mike
post Mar 19 2015, 06:56 PM
Post #4





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (Truthissweet @ Mar 19 2015, 12:59 PM) *
Both cases really don't mean a whole lot. Do not expect some eventful decision. That is what gatekeepers do: screw up real 911 researchers quest for an honest case in court. Ellen Mariani and Willie Rodriguez come to mind. Both gatekeepers who keep people still in the 911 Stone Age happy because they think these two are so wonderful taking cases to court. Wake up.


You seem to be implying that Dr. Niels Harrit is a gatekeeper.
If so, can you please explain why?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paranoia
post Mar 20 2015, 03:23 PM
Post #5


dig deeper


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,033
Joined: 16-October 06
From: arlington va
Member No.: 96



im not implying that harriet is a gatekeeper, but i have a real issue with the concept of the wtc's being "weakened" intentionally in order to help demolish them, whether it be with thermite (per harriet) or any other substance. for anyone interested, i elaborate here:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10769801
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10770196
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...amp;pid=8836855

cheers.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tamborine man
post Mar 20 2015, 11:05 PM
Post #6





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 951
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 1,315



'Atrocious' translation, but you can still get a sense of

what took place at the proceedings:

https://translate.google.dk/translate?sl=da...&edit-text=

Cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthissweet
post Mar 21 2015, 11:02 AM
Post #7





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 245
Joined: 25-August 14
From: Third rock from the sun
Member No.: 7,913



QUOTE (Tamborine man @ Mar 20 2015, 10:05 PM) *
'Atrocious' translation, but you can still get a sense of

what took place at the proceedings:

https://translate.google.dk/translate?sl=da...&edit-text=

Cheers


TM, thanks for the info on the court case. It is good when someone lives in area where 911 cases take place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NP1Mike
post Mar 21 2015, 04:07 PM
Post #8





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (paranoia @ Mar 20 2015, 02:23 PM) *
im not implying that harriet is a gatekeeper, but i have a real issue with the concept of the wtc's being "weakened" intentionally in order to help demolish them, whether it be with thermite (per harriet) or any other substance. for anyone interested, i elaborate here:


You must admit paranoia, that in the scheme of all things related to 9/11,
this issue is a trivial matter.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Mar 22 2015, 03:18 PM
Post #9





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (Tamborine man @ Mar 20 2015, 11:05 PM) *
'Atrocious' translation, but you can still get a sense of

what took place at the proceedings:

https://translate.google.dk/translate?sl=da...&edit-text=

Cheers



Cheers to you too TM.

And so it goes, the Danish court is as corrupt as any other in the world, suppressing discussion, helping form the public opinion and tell the big lie.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rearden
post Mar 22 2015, 04:39 PM
Post #10





Group: Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: 10-March 15
Member No.: 8,081



If you would like to know what might have been behind the WTC demolition go to min:47 of video 2 and it is very well explained why Larry Silverstein (owner) had a very good reason for wanting them brought down (hint: asbestos)
http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/se...e&artid=167
QUOTE (paranoia @ Mar 20 2015, 02:23 PM) *
im not implying that harriet is a gatekeeper, but i have a real issue with the concept of the wtc's being "weakened" intentionally in order to help demolish them, whether it be with thermite (per harriet) or any other substance. for anyone interested, i elaborate here:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10769801
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10770196
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...amp;pid=8836855

cheers.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthissweet
post Mar 22 2015, 06:53 PM
Post #11





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 245
Joined: 25-August 14
From: Third rock from the sun
Member No.: 7,913



QUOTE (Rearden @ Mar 22 2015, 03:39 PM) *
If you would like to know what might have been behind the WTC demolition go to min:47 of video 2 and it is very well explained why Larry Silverstein (owner) had a very good reason for wanting them brought down (hint: asbestos)
http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/se...e&artid=167


Most here have known that since at least 2003.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthissweet
post Mar 24 2015, 08:28 AM
Post #12





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 245
Joined: 25-August 14
From: Third rock from the sun
Member No.: 7,913



From AE911 email this morning. The article has other links in it.

http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3...cbb4a5dd&e=[UNIQID]
QUOTE
Riding a wave of support from 9/11 activists around the world, Dr. Niels Harrit went to Danish High Court on Thursday, March 12, 2015 to appeal his libel suit against Danish newspaper Weekendavisen.

During the four-hour hearing, Dr. Harrit performed a master class for the three judges and 20 onlookers in the packed courtroom – both with his legal reasoning and with his presentation of the WTC evidence. For a detailed account of the hearing, we invite you to read our just-published article by Danish 9/11 activist Josef Hanji. A decision from the judges is expected on April 9, 2015.

The hearing generated at least two mainstream media reports. One was a relatively balanced profile of Dr. Harrit from the widely-read Politiken (an English translation can be read here); the other was an eight-minute appearance on DR3 TV, one of Denmark’s national public television channels, starting at the 11:45 mark (a version with subtitles is forthcoming). We hope more coverage will follow when the decision is issued on April 9.

Lastly, you can watch an interview with Dr. Harrit himself, conducted an hour after the hearing.

We would like to thank everyone who contributed toward Niels Harrit’s legal fund. Your generosity made it possible for Dr. Harrit to show in a court of law that the science supporting the WTC controlled demolition theory is not only sound, but is overwhelming.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Mar 24 2015, 09:19 AM
Post #13





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Good news then--the court will not decide until April 9. There is a chance that justice and truth might prevail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
excontroller
post Mar 25 2015, 12:17 PM
Post #14





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 101
Joined: 28-December 09
From: Ypsilanti, MI
Member No.: 4,819



QUOTE (Rearden @ Mar 22 2015, 03:39 PM) *
If you would like to know what might have been behind the WTC demolition go to min:47 of video 2 and it is very well explained why Larry Silverstein (owner) had a very good reason for wanting them brought down (hint: asbestos)
http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/se...e&artid=167


That baloney about his wife making an appointment to see a dermatologist that morning is NUTS! ANY businessman of his importance, would NEVER cancel a meeting about BUSINESS, to see a freakin' doctor! What a load of malarkey!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Mar 27 2015, 05:44 PM
Post #15





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Great point excontroller.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
excontroller
post Mar 28 2015, 11:42 AM
Post #16





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 101
Joined: 28-December 09
From: Ypsilanti, MI
Member No.: 4,819



QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 27 2015, 04:44 PM) *
Great point excontroller.



Well it just struck me as totally inane to THINK that a big time businessman would even CONSIDER a doctor appointment over doing business! AIN'T happenin'! These types are absolute FREAKS when it comes to doing business! Larry Silverstein would NOT allow his WIFE to schedule a lousy PEDICURE for him, either! He KNEW not to enter that building that morning! It just makes me shudder to think how these guys should be in prison instead of continuing to live lives of extreme luxury!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th June 2018 - 10:55 AM